【摘要】：中美輪胎特保案是啟動(dòng)世界貿(mào)易組織爭(zhēng)端解決程序解決的第一個(gè)針對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)品的特別保障措施案件。該案也是美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)所發(fā)動(dòng)的特保調(diào)查案件中規(guī)模最大的一個(gè),在后金融危機(jī)時(shí)期,各國(guó)都處于經(jīng)濟(jì)重創(chuàng)后的恢復(fù)期,系統(tǒng)性的消費(fèi)能力下降,正是在這樣的大背景下奧巴馬政府于2009年宣布對(duì)中國(guó)輸美輪胎產(chǎn)品實(shí)施特別保障措施,具體做法為附加高額的關(guān)稅。雙方磋商未果后經(jīng)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)裁決,本文正是立足于特保機(jī)制的研究并對(duì)專(zhuān)家組的裁決進(jìn)行分析。 本論文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分：輪胎特保案案情簡(jiǎn)介,簡(jiǎn)要回顧輪胎特保案的發(fā)生背景。另外還根據(jù)案件進(jìn)展情況所制作了一個(gè)完整又簡(jiǎn)單清楚的案情發(fā)展回顧,在序列的最后部分列出了上訴機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)此案的最終核心意見(jiàn)。 第二部分：輪胎特保案法律問(wèn)題解析,首先介紹了保障措施及特別保障措施,包括其淵源、性質(zhì)、原則。然后將“中國(guó)式特�！碧貏e作為一個(gè)方面進(jìn)行解析。再次,將《保障措施協(xié)議》體系下的保障措施與《中國(guó)入世議定書(shū)》中的,“中國(guó)式特�！边M(jìn)行了一個(gè)較為全面的比較,并其后闡明了兩者的關(guān)系及適用,力圖明確全案的法律問(wèn)題。 第三部分對(duì)專(zhuān)家組裁決的分析：以中國(guó)提交至WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)的申訴報(bào)告為基礎(chǔ),穿插了WTO法律解釋之規(guī)則的分析,再就專(zhuān)家組案件爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的裁決進(jìn)行逐一評(píng)析、總結(jié)。 第四部分?jǐn)≡V的思考及對(duì)策：針對(duì)上一部分專(zhuān)家組的裁決,分析來(lái)自于中國(guó)自身的原因,并就未來(lái)應(yīng)對(duì)“中國(guó)式特�！碧岢鲆恍⿲�(duì)策。
[Abstract]:The Sino-American tire protection case is the first special safeguard case against Chinese products to start the WTO dispute settlement process. This case is also the largest of the special protection investigations launched by the United States against China. In the post-financial crisis period, all countries are in the recovery period after the economic downfall, and the systemic spending power has declined. It is against this backdrop that the Obama administration announced in 2009 special safeguards for Chinese tire exports to the United States by imposing high tariffs. After the negotiation between the two sides failed, the WTO dispute settlement body ruled, this article is based on the research of the special safeguard mechanism and the analysis of the panel ruling. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part: brief introduction of tire protection case, briefly review the background of tire protection case. In addition, a complete, simple and clear review of developments is made based on the progress of the case, and the final core opinion of the appellate body on the case is set out in the final part of the sequence. The second part: the analysis of the legal problems of tire special protection case. Firstly, it introduces the safeguard measures and special safeguard measures, including their origin, nature and principle. Then the "Chinese special safeguard" as a particular aspect of the analysis. Thirdly, the safeguard measures under the safeguards Agreement system are compared with those in the Protocol of China's accession to the WTO, and the relationship and application of the two measures are expounded. Try to clarify the legal issues of the whole case. The third part analyzes the panel decision: based on the complaint report submitted by China to the WTO dispute settlement body, the author intersperses the analysis of the rules of the WTO legal interpretation, and then evaluates the dispute focus of the panel case one by one, and summarizes the conclusion. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the reasons from China and puts forward some countermeasures to deal with the "Chinese special safeguard" in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 劉新宇;試析美國(guó)對(duì)華第一起特殊保障措施案[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年09期

2 李娟;;“美國(guó)對(duì)華輪胎特保案”述評(píng)——以WTO相關(guān)規(guī)則為參照系[J];法商研究;2010年01期

3 曾令良;中國(guó)特定產(chǎn)品過(guò)渡性保障機(jī)制的有效性與合理性問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年05期

4 楊威;;從美國(guó)對(duì)華輪胎特保案淺析貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年34期

5 武立宏;;論特別保障措施涉及的法律問(wèn)題[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2003年08期

6 賀小勇;;論近期中美貿(mào)易摩擦的法律對(duì)策[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2004年04期

7 黃志瑾;;中美輪胎特保案專(zhuān)家組報(bào)告評(píng)析——敗訴的啟示[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2011年02期

8 M.希爾夫,朱益宇,黃列;權(quán)力,規(guī)則和原則——哪一個(gè)是WTO/GATT的法律導(dǎo)向?[J];環(huán)球法津評(píng)論;2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊璐;論中美輪胎特保案中專(zhuān)家組的裁決[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 董磊;對(duì)華特殊保障措施法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2343681