【摘要】：國際投資領(lǐng)域,最惠國待遇概括來說是指東道國對外國投資者實(shí)行的待遇不低于其已經(jīng)給予或?qū)⒔o予第三國投資者的待遇。目前有效的投資條約,對最惠國待遇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)能否擴(kuò)張適用于投資爭端解決的程序事項(xiàng)未作明確規(guī)定,因此對此問題無論在理論上還是司法實(shí)踐中均存在困境和爭議。 本文運(yùn)用分析和比較的方法,主要從理論、實(shí)踐方面,對最惠國待遇擴(kuò)大適用對爭端解決程序的影響和我國可以采取的防范措施等問題進(jìn)行了探討。 文章一共分為四個部分:第一部分從理論方面對一般意義及國際投資領(lǐng)域中的最惠國待遇的基本含義、適用范圍等進(jìn)行了分析,回顧了最惠國待遇原則的起源,以典型案例“Maffezini v. Spain”案為主要切入點(diǎn),討論最惠國待遇擴(kuò)張適用于投資爭端解決程序的問題產(chǎn)生過程及隨之而來的理論上的模糊和爭議,對最惠國待遇擴(kuò)大適用加以界定;第二部分從ICSID的仲裁實(shí)踐入手,對支持和反對最惠國待遇擴(kuò)大適用的觀點(diǎn)和理由進(jìn)行歸納,并對爭議的一些焦點(diǎn)問題比如條約的解釋方法、對優(yōu)惠的認(rèn)定等進(jìn)行了探討;第三部分以現(xiàn)有的投資條約中的程序事項(xiàng)的規(guī)定為基礎(chǔ),分析了最惠國待遇擴(kuò)大適用對爭端解決程序適用的影響;第四部分立足我國締約實(shí)踐,提出采取防范措施的建議,包括在立法中明確我國的立場,根據(jù)締約國家的不同情況采用不同的規(guī)定,同時關(guān)注條約溯及力的問題,運(yùn)用溯及力原則對最惠國待遇的擴(kuò)大適用加以限制,提高自身參與國際爭端解決的能力,以降低因條約規(guī)定不明給我國際投資活動帶來的風(fēng)險。
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, MFN treatment generally refers to the treatment that the host country has given or will give to foreign investors. Whether the MFN standard can be extended to the settlement of investment disputes is not clearly stipulated in the current effective investment treaties, so there are difficulties and disputes in both theory and judicial practice. By means of analysis and comparison, this paper discusses the influence of the extended application of most-favoured-nation treatment on the dispute settlement procedure and the preventive measures that can be taken by our country from the aspects of theory and practice. The article is divided into four parts: the first part analyzes the general meaning and the basic meaning and application scope of MFN treatment in the field of international investment, and reviews the origin of MFN principle. Taking the typical case of "Maffezini v. Spain" as the main breakthrough point, this paper discusses the process of the expansion of MFN treatment in the process of investment dispute settlement and the theoretical ambiguity and controversy that follows, and defines the extended application of MFN treatment. The second part starts with the arbitration practice of ICSID, summarizes the viewpoints and reasons of supporting and opposing the application of MFN, and probes into some key issues in dispute, such as the interpretation method of treaties, the confirmation of preferential treatment and so on. The third part, based on the provisions of the existing investment treaties on procedural matters, analyzes the impact of the expanded application of MFN treatment on the application of dispute settlement procedures; The fourth part is based on the practice of contracting in our country, and puts forward some suggestions of taking preventive measures, including clarifying our country's position in legislation, adopting different provisions according to the different situations of the contracting countries, and paying attention to the retroactive effect of the treaty at the same time. The principle of retroactive effect is applied to restrict the application of MFN treatment and to improve its ability to participate in the settlement of international disputes so as to reduce the risks brought to our international investment by the unspecified provisions of treaties.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉小吾;;解讀公共政策[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2009年04期

2 余勁松;外資的公平與公正待遇問題研究——由NAFTA的實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];法商研究;2005年06期

3 徐崇利;;從實(shí)體到程序:最惠國待遇適用范圍之爭[J];法商研究;2007年02期

4 張振華;;國際投資協(xié)定中最惠國待遇條款的新發(fā)展與中國的應(yīng)對之策[J];湖南財經(jīng)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2008年06期

5 沈志韜;;論國際投資仲裁正當(dāng)性危機(jī)[J];時代法學(xué);2010年02期

6 劉用安;;立法技術(shù):精無止境[J];人民政壇;2009年10期

7 張光;;論國際投資仲裁中非投資國際義務(wù)的適用進(jìn)路[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 盧鑠棟;最惠國條款適用于爭端解決程序事項(xiàng)問題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

2 劉遠(yuǎn)志;投資爭端仲裁上訴機(jī)制研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2335818