《紐約公約》下國(guó)際商事仲裁協(xié)議的效力研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-12 17:11
【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化已成為不可逆轉(zhuǎn)大趨勢(shì),在此背景下,我國(guó)涉外民商事往來(lái)過(guò)程中的糾紛也隨著日趨增多。而作為解決國(guó)際上民商事主體糾紛的國(guó)際民商事仲裁(下文如無(wú)說(shuō)明,“仲裁”即是指“國(guó)際民商事仲裁”,“仲裁協(xié)議”即是指“國(guó)際民商事仲裁協(xié)議”)受到國(guó)內(nèi)外的廣泛認(rèn)可和承認(rèn),因?yàn)橹俨檬歉咝Ы鉀Q國(guó)內(nèi)外商事?tīng)?zhēng)議的途徑之一,具有廣泛國(guó)際性、高度自治性、裁決權(quán)威性、執(zhí)行強(qiáng)制、快速的特點(diǎn)。在仲裁開(kāi)始與執(zhí)行中,仲裁的基石是當(dāng)事人達(dá)成一致意見(jiàn)的仲裁條款或仲裁協(xié)議。這主要是指當(dāng)事人多方或雙方在平等、自愿、互利、共同商量的前提之下,將所涉及到的爭(zhēng)端提交仲裁庭或仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁,請(qǐng)求其作為中間組織來(lái)解決問(wèn)題的口頭或書(shū)面文件。因此,在國(guó)內(nèi)外仲裁實(shí)踐中,首要要解決的是如何認(rèn)定仲裁協(xié)議的效力的問(wèn)題,這對(duì)于解決國(guó)際民商事仲裁糾紛顯得極為重要。本文擬通過(guò)具體的實(shí)踐和理論分析,說(shuō)明隨著國(guó)際貿(mào)易發(fā)展和國(guó)際民商事仲裁實(shí)踐中不斷涌現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,對(duì)認(rèn)定國(guó)際民商事仲裁協(xié)議效力的判斷與規(guī)定上《紐約公約》存在不足與缺漏,已不能滿足仲裁發(fā)展的需要,在實(shí)踐中對(duì)如何認(rèn)定仲裁協(xié)議的效力又出現(xiàn)了新問(wèn)題、新情況;進(jìn)而進(jìn)一步從我國(guó)法律規(guī)定的現(xiàn)狀、仲裁理論的滯后性以及仲裁實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的具體操作問(wèn)題等方面來(lái)深入分析我國(guó)仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)在認(rèn)定國(guó)際民商事仲裁協(xié)議效力方面的不足、缺漏與存在的問(wèn)題;并通過(guò)研究域外具有代表性的國(guó)家的成熟的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)和實(shí)踐成果,對(duì)我國(guó)仲裁的發(fā)展與完善提出建設(shè)性、具體性、創(chuàng)造性的意見(jiàn)。本文詳細(xì)的論述可分為四部分,其中第一部分內(nèi)容以敘述《紐約公約》對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁協(xié)議效力的相關(guān)規(guī)定來(lái)進(jìn)入主題、展開(kāi)分析;第二部分介紹執(zhí)行《紐約公約》的域外經(jīng)驗(yàn),主要從美國(guó)、英國(guó)、法國(guó)的相關(guān)實(shí)踐來(lái)分析;第三部分筆者會(huì)詳述在以公約和國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁法審查和判斷仲裁協(xié)議效力方面我國(guó)的現(xiàn)狀和遇到的問(wèn)題;最后一部分闡述如何吸取國(guó)內(nèi)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),完善我國(guó)仲裁協(xié)議效力的認(rèn)定規(guī)則,以及完善我國(guó)商事仲裁的立法體系,促進(jìn)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)生活發(fā)展以及公平高效解決爭(zhēng)議。
[Abstract]:Economic globalization has become an irreversible trend. Under this background, disputes in the process of civil and commercial exchanges involving foreign countries in China are increasing day by day. And international civil and commercial arbitration, as a solution to disputes between civil and commercial subjects, (if not explained below, "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "Arbitration Agreement" refers to the "International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement", which is widely recognized and recognized at home and abroad, because arbitration is one of the effective ways to resolve commercial disputes at home and abroad. It has broad international character, a high degree of autonomy and authority of adjudication. The characteristic of enforcement and speed. In the beginning and execution of arbitration, the cornerstone of arbitration is an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement reached by the parties. This mainly refers to the parties or parties on the premise of equality, voluntary, mutual benefit and joint consultation, submit the disputes involved to the arbitration tribunal or arbitration institution for arbitration, and request them to solve the problem as an intermediary organization orally or in writing. Therefore, in the practice of arbitration at home and abroad, the most important problem is how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement, which is very important for the settlement of international civil and commercial arbitration disputes. In this paper, through the specific practice and theoretical analysis, the paper explains the problems that have emerged in the international trade development and the practice of international civil and commercial arbitration. In the judgment and regulation of the validity of the International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement, the New York Convention has shortcomings and gaps, which can not meet the needs of the development of arbitration. In practice, there are new problems and new situations on how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement. Furthermore, from the aspects of the current situation of our country's laws and regulations, the lag of the arbitration theory and the concrete operation problems in the arbitration practice, this paper further analyzes the deficiency of our country's arbitration institutions in determining the validity of the international civil and commercial arbitration agreement. Gaps and problems; By studying the mature legislative experience and practical achievements of overseas representative countries, this paper puts forward constructive, concrete and creative opinions on the development and perfection of arbitration in China. This paper can be divided into four parts in detail, the first part of the content to describe the provisions of the New York Convention on the effectiveness of international commercial arbitration agreement to enter the theme, analysis; The second part introduces the extraterritorial experience of the implementation of the New York Convention, mainly from the United States, the United Kingdom, France to analyze the relevant practice; In the third part, the author will expound the current situation and problems of our country in reviewing and judging the validity of arbitration agreement by convention and domestic arbitration law. The last part expounds how to draw lessons from domestic and foreign experiences, perfect the rules of confirming the validity of arbitration agreement in our country, perfect the legislative system of commercial arbitration in our country, promote the development of social economic life and resolve disputes fairly and efficiently.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.4
本文編號(hào)：2327694
[Abstract]:Economic globalization has become an irreversible trend. Under this background, disputes in the process of civil and commercial exchanges involving foreign countries in China are increasing day by day. And international civil and commercial arbitration, as a solution to disputes between civil and commercial subjects, (if not explained below, "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "Arbitration Agreement" refers to the "International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement", which is widely recognized and recognized at home and abroad, because arbitration is one of the effective ways to resolve commercial disputes at home and abroad. It has broad international character, a high degree of autonomy and authority of adjudication. The characteristic of enforcement and speed. In the beginning and execution of arbitration, the cornerstone of arbitration is an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement reached by the parties. This mainly refers to the parties or parties on the premise of equality, voluntary, mutual benefit and joint consultation, submit the disputes involved to the arbitration tribunal or arbitration institution for arbitration, and request them to solve the problem as an intermediary organization orally or in writing. Therefore, in the practice of arbitration at home and abroad, the most important problem is how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement, which is very important for the settlement of international civil and commercial arbitration disputes. In this paper, through the specific practice and theoretical analysis, the paper explains the problems that have emerged in the international trade development and the practice of international civil and commercial arbitration. In the judgment and regulation of the validity of the International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement, the New York Convention has shortcomings and gaps, which can not meet the needs of the development of arbitration. In practice, there are new problems and new situations on how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement. Furthermore, from the aspects of the current situation of our country's laws and regulations, the lag of the arbitration theory and the concrete operation problems in the arbitration practice, this paper further analyzes the deficiency of our country's arbitration institutions in determining the validity of the international civil and commercial arbitration agreement. Gaps and problems; By studying the mature legislative experience and practical achievements of overseas representative countries, this paper puts forward constructive, concrete and creative opinions on the development and perfection of arbitration in China. This paper can be divided into four parts in detail, the first part of the content to describe the provisions of the New York Convention on the effectiveness of international commercial arbitration agreement to enter the theme, analysis; The second part introduces the extraterritorial experience of the implementation of the New York Convention, mainly from the United States, the United Kingdom, France to analyze the relevant practice; In the third part, the author will expound the current situation and problems of our country in reviewing and judging the validity of arbitration agreement by convention and domestic arbitration law. The last part expounds how to draw lessons from domestic and foreign experiences, perfect the rules of confirming the validity of arbitration agreement in our country, perfect the legislative system of commercial arbitration in our country, promote the development of social economic life and resolve disputes fairly and efficiently.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊文升;張虎;;論《紐約公約》下仲裁協(xié)議效力的確定——以“默示仲裁協(xié)議”為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2015年04期
2 李晶;;國(guó)際商事仲裁中臨時(shí)措施在中國(guó)的新發(fā)展——以民訴法修改和仲裁規(guī)則修訂為視角[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期
3 尉寧;;論《紐約公約》框架下我國(guó)的執(zhí)行及存在的問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年13期
4 周振;;論我國(guó)在國(guó)際商事仲裁中承認(rèn)臨時(shí)仲裁的立法必要性[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年05期
5 劉丹;;國(guó)際法在國(guó)際商事仲裁中的法律適用問(wèn)題[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2011年05期
6 趙秀文;;從相關(guān)案例看ICC仲裁院裁決在我國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];法學(xué);2010年03期
7 楊弘磊;;人民法院涉外仲裁司法審查情況的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];武大國(guó)際法評(píng)論;2009年01期
8 萬(wàn)鄂湘;;《紐約公約》在中國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐[J];法律適用;2009年03期
9 喬欣;;中外商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督范圍的比較與借鑒[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年02期
10 曾誠(chéng);;試論機(jī)構(gòu)仲裁框架下的臨時(shí)仲裁制度——以新加坡國(guó)際仲裁中心仲裁規(guī)則的修改為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年05期
，本文編號(hào)：2327694
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2327694.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
