【摘要】：國(guó)際投資仲裁作為當(dāng)前解決東道國(guó)與投資者之間投資爭(zhēng)端的主要法律方式,對(duì)于保護(hù)投資者的利益,維護(hù)國(guó)際投資的法制以及國(guó)際投資的健康發(fā)展發(fā)揮著重要的作用。本文在國(guó)際投資仲裁實(shí)踐案例的基礎(chǔ)上,分析了國(guó)際投資仲裁程序中最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用的幾個(gè)主要問(wèn)題以及其產(chǎn)生的原因,并據(jù)此對(duì)我國(guó)在這一問(wèn)題上應(yīng)采取的態(tài)度以及措施提出意見(jiàn)和建議。第一部分簡(jiǎn)要介紹了國(guó)際投資仲裁對(duì)最惠國(guó)待遇問(wèn)題實(shí)踐的案例,并簡(jiǎn)要評(píng)析了肯定最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用于國(guó)際投資仲裁程序與否定最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用于國(guó)際投資仲裁程序觀點(diǎn)存在的主要爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)。第二部分具體分析了最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用于國(guó)際投資仲裁程序的幾個(gè)主要的問(wèn)題,即最惠國(guó)待遇條款的解釋規(guī)則,國(guó)際投資仲裁程序“最惠”的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及國(guó)際投資仲裁條款的特殊性問(wèn)題,并分析了相關(guān)問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的主要影響因素。第三部分對(duì)國(guó)際投資仲裁中最惠國(guó)待遇條款問(wèn)題在我國(guó)發(fā)展的若干問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析,指出無(wú)論出于當(dāng)前國(guó)際投資仲裁的司法實(shí)踐的傾向,還是從當(dāng)前我國(guó)對(duì)外投資的發(fā)展以及國(guó)際投資仲裁對(duì)投資者的保護(hù)角度,我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)采取開(kāi)放性態(tài)度,并應(yīng)當(dāng)通過(guò)完善國(guó)際投資協(xié)定和明確最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用的方式,使最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用于國(guó)際投資仲裁對(duì)我國(guó)產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面影響最小化。總之,國(guó)際投資仲裁中最惠國(guó)待遇條款問(wèn)題的產(chǎn)生有著多方面的原因,雖然我國(guó)還沒(méi)有相關(guān)問(wèn)題的司法實(shí)踐,但是隨著我國(guó)對(duì)外投資深度與廣度的拓展,對(duì)于最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用于國(guó)際投資仲裁程序方面的爭(zhēng)論,也必將是我國(guó)不能回避的問(wèn)題。對(duì)最惠國(guó)待遇條款對(duì)投資爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的適用,尤其是對(duì)國(guó)際投資仲裁程序的適用持有開(kāi)放的態(tài)度并且積極完善應(yīng)對(duì)的措施,趨利避害,從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來(lái)看或許更加的有利于我國(guó)的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As the main legal way to solve the investment disputes between host country and investor, international investment arbitration plays an important role in protecting the interests of investors, maintaining the legal system of international investment and the healthy development of international investment. Based on the practical cases of international investment arbitration, this paper analyzes the main problems and causes of the application of the most-favoured-nation clause in the procedure of international investment arbitration. Based on this, the author puts forward some opinions and suggestions on the attitude and measures that China should take on this issue. The first part briefly introduces the practice of international investment arbitration on most-favoured-nation treatment. This paper also briefly analyzes the main points of dispute in the view that the MFN clause is applicable to the international investment arbitration procedure and that the MFN clause is applicable to the international investment arbitration procedure. The second part analyzes the main problems of MFN clauses applied to international investment arbitration, namely, the rules of interpretation of MFN clauses. The standard of "most favorable" in the procedure of international investment arbitration and the particularity of the clause of international investment arbitration are discussed, and the main influencing factors are analyzed. The third part analyzes some problems of the most-favoured-nation clause in the international investment arbitration in China, and points out the tendency of the judicial practice of the current international investment arbitration. Still, from the perspective of the development of China's foreign investment and the protection of investors by international investment arbitration, China should adopt an open attitude, and should adopt the means of perfecting the international investment agreements and clarifying the application of the most-favoured-nation treatment clause. The application of MFN clause to international investment arbitration minimizes the negative impact on China. In short, there are many reasons for the most-favoured-nation clause in international investment arbitration. Although there is no judicial practice of related issues in our country, but with the expansion of the depth and breadth of China's foreign investment, The dispute about the application of most-favoured-nation clause to the procedure of international investment arbitration is bound to be an unavoidable issue in China. Holding an open attitude to the application of MFN clauses to the investment dispute settlement mechanism, especially to the application of international investment arbitration procedures, and actively perfecting the measures to deal with them, so as to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages, In the long run, perhaps more conducive to the development of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D997.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃世席;;國(guó)際投資仲裁中的挑選條約問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2014年01期

2 劉穎;封筠;;國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端中最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用范圍的擴(kuò)展——由實(shí)體性問(wèn)題向程序性問(wèn)題的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2013年04期

3 郭桂環(huán);;論BIT中最惠國(guó)待遇條款的解釋[J];河北法學(xué);2013年06期

4 梁丹妮;;國(guó)際投資條約最惠國(guó)待遇條款適用問(wèn)題研究——以“伊佳蘭公司訴中國(guó)案”為中心的分析[J];法商研究;2012年02期

5 黃勐;;從發(fā)展的角度探討最惠國(guó)待遇適用于投資爭(zhēng)端解決[J];學(xué)理論;2010年30期

6 趙駿;;論雙邊投資條約中最惠國(guó)待遇條款擴(kuò)張適用于程序性事項(xiàng)[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年07期

7 沈志韜;;論國(guó)際投資仲裁正當(dāng)性危機(jī)[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2010年02期

8 王楠;;最惠國(guó)待遇條款在國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端解決事項(xiàng)上的適用問(wèn)題[J];河北法學(xué);2010年01期

9 徐崇利;;從實(shí)體到程序:最惠國(guó)待遇適用范圍之爭(zhēng)[J];法商研究;2007年02期

10 李良才;;經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化背景下最惠國(guó)待遇條款的新發(fā)展[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 林愛(ài)民;國(guó)際投資協(xié)定爭(zhēng)議仲裁研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

2 梁詠;中國(guó)投資者海外投資法律保障制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

3 石慧;以條約為基礎(chǔ)的投資者與國(guó)家間仲裁機(jī)制的評(píng)判[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王路路;最惠國(guó)條款在國(guó)際投資法領(lǐng)域的新發(fā)展研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2014年

2 張憲兵;論ICSID仲裁中最惠國(guó)待遇條款的適用[D];新疆大學(xué);2013年

3 杜益嬌;論ICSID仲裁實(shí)踐中最惠國(guó)待遇條款的適用和我國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

4 方荀;ICSID仲裁實(shí)踐中最惠國(guó)待遇適用范圍問(wèn)題的研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

5 汪宇婧;國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端中最惠國(guó)待遇適用擴(kuò)大化問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2296728