【摘要】：在國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的趨勢(shì)下,國(guó)際貿(mào)易迅速發(fā)展,世界各國(guó)的企業(yè)對(duì)國(guó)際市場(chǎng)的依賴程度日益增加。但與此同時(shí),各國(guó)在發(fā)展對(duì)外貿(mào)易的同時(shí),相互之間的摩擦也日益增多,使用WTO允許的反傾銷(xiāo)、反補(bǔ)貼和保障措施三種貿(mào)易救濟(jì)方式對(duì)處理國(guó)際貿(mào)易過(guò)程中的爭(zhēng)端發(fā)揮著巨大作用,能夠?qū)?guó)際貿(mào)易的秩序起到規(guī)范作用。WTO允許的貿(mào)易救濟(jì)方式合法合理的使用能夠保障國(guó)際貿(mào)易的健康發(fā)展,但是如果各國(guó)將其作為保護(hù)本國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)利益的工具而加以濫用,則會(huì)引起國(guó)際貿(mào)易過(guò)程中的不公平、不公正待遇,對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展起阻礙作用。中國(guó)實(shí)行改革開(kāi)放政策以來(lái),經(jīng)濟(jì)迅速發(fā)展,對(duì)外貿(mào)易額也迅速增加,市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制逐步完善,在世界范圍內(nèi)取得了舉世矚目的成就。但是中國(guó)在國(guó)際貿(mào)易領(lǐng)域卻面臨著諸多的不公平待遇,中國(guó)現(xiàn)已成為世界遭受反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查最多的國(guó)家,反傾銷(xiāo)已被作為美國(guó)、歐盟等國(guó)家貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義的工具在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中頻繁使用。中國(guó)入世以后,卻又始終面臨著“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)”地位問(wèn)題所帶來(lái)的困擾,中國(guó)產(chǎn)品在接受外國(guó)的反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查時(shí)經(jīng)常被使用替代國(guó)制度來(lái)計(jì)算產(chǎn)品的正常價(jià)值。 第一部分介紹替代國(guó)制度的基本理論,包括替代國(guó)制度的概念、替代國(guó)制度在國(guó)際法上的發(fā)展演變,最后介紹替代國(guó)制度產(chǎn)生的法律原因。 第二部分闡述的是替代國(guó)制度對(duì)中國(guó)的影響,首先從介紹中國(guó)遭受反傾銷(xiāo)調(diào)查的基本狀況和目前中國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)法律制度的基本狀況出發(fā),分析替代國(guó)制度對(duì)中國(guó)的歧視性待遇以及“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)”問(wèn)題的實(shí)質(zhì)。 第三部分是對(duì)美國(guó)、歐盟、加拿大、澳大利亞和印度的反傾銷(xiāo)法中替代國(guó)制度的研究。 第四部分通過(guò)揭示替代國(guó)制度貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義本質(zhì),分析該制度和WTO基本原則和WTO反傾銷(xiāo)法律規(guī)則的關(guān)系,最后從法理學(xué)的角度對(duì)其進(jìn)行合理性進(jìn)行探討。 第五部分是基于對(duì)替代國(guó)制度的特征和本質(zhì)而對(duì)中國(guó)政府、企業(yè)和立法層面提出的對(duì)策和建議,對(duì)于合理應(yīng)對(duì)替代國(guó)制度具有重要意義。
[Abstract]:Under the trend of international economic globalization, international trade develops rapidly, and the enterprises in the world depend on the international market day by day. But at the same time, while developing foreign trade, the friction among countries is also increasing day by day. The antidumping allowed by WTO is used. Anti-subsidy and safeguard measures play an important role in dealing with disputes in the process of international trade. The legal and reasonable use of the trade relief allowed by the WTO can ensure the healthy development of international trade, but if countries abuse it as a tool to protect their industrial interests, It will cause unfair and unfair treatment in the process of international trade and hinder the development of international trade. Since the implementation of the policy of reform and opening to the outside world, China's economy has developed rapidly, its foreign trade volume has also increased rapidly, the market economy system has been gradually improved, and it has made remarkable achievements in the world. However, China is facing a lot of unfair treatment in the field of international trade. China has now become the country that has suffered the most anti-dumping investigations in the world, and anti-dumping has been regarded as the United States. The instruments of trade protectionism in the European Union and other countries are frequently used in international trade. After China's entry into WTO, however, it is always confronted with the problem of "non-market economy" status. Chinese products are often used to calculate the normal value of products when they accept anti-dumping investigations from foreign countries. The first part introduces the basic theory of surrogate country system, including the concept of surrogate country system, the development and evolution of surrogate country system in international law, and finally introduces the legal reasons for the generation of surrogate country system. The second part expounds the influence of surrogate country system on China. Firstly, it introduces the basic situation of anti-dumping investigation in China and the basic status of China's antidumping legal system at present. This paper analyzes the discriminatory treatment of surrogate country system against China and the essence of "non-market economy". The third part is a study of the surrogate country system in the anti-dumping laws of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia and India. In the fourth part, by revealing the nature of trade protectionism in surrogate country system, the author analyzes the relationship between the system and the basic principles of WTO and the anti-dumping legal rules of WTO. Finally, the rationality of the system is discussed from the angle of jurisprudence. The fifth part is based on the characteristics and nature of the surrogate country system to the Chinese government, enterprises and legislative level put forward countermeasures and suggestions, for a reasonable response to the surrogate country system is of great significance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1;F752.02

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 冉宗榮;論西方“替代國(guó)制度”的本質(zhì)及危害[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

2 胡劍;;試述法理學(xué)視角下的替代國(guó)制度[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上半月);2007年12期

3 楊瑤;;歐盟反傾銷(xiāo)規(guī)則非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家問(wèn)題研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年27期

4 王曉非;評(píng)歐盟反傾銷(xiāo)法及實(shí)踐中替代國(guó)方法的消極性[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2003年08期

5 徐昱春;論WTO《反傾銷(xiāo)協(xié)議》替代國(guó)制度的存廢與完善[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年03期

6 劉江琴;馬德才;;析替代國(guó)制度及我國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

7 陳力;;美國(guó)反傾銷(xiāo)法之“非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)”規(guī)則研究[J];美國(guó)研究;2006年03期

8 陳立虎;關(guān)于《中國(guó)入世議定書(shū)》中替代國(guó)條款的思考[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2002年06期

9 呂昆燕;馬鵬;;論反傾銷(xiāo)中的替代國(guó)制度問(wèn)題[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2009年22期

10 王永杰,丁國(guó)軍;論WTO成員對(duì)華適用替代國(guó)制度的國(guó)際法依據(jù)與中國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)之策[J];行政與法;2003年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 董婷;美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷(xiāo)中替代國(guó)制度研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2006年

2 周靜;反傾銷(xiāo)法中替代國(guó)制度研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2008年

3 劉平平;歐盟反傾銷(xiāo)法中的類(lèi)比國(guó)制度研究[D];西北大學(xué);2009年

4 侯哲;論歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷(xiāo)的替代國(guó)制度[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

5 郭影;國(guó)際反傾銷(xiāo)實(shí)踐中的替代國(guó)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2263813