【摘要】：《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》(ACTA)是美國(guó)、歐盟、日本等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國(guó)在2011年締結(jié)的最新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)公約。該公約在民事侵權(quán)救濟(jì)、邊境措施、刑事責(zé)任、數(shù)字環(huán)境下執(zhí)法和國(guó)際合作等領(lǐng)域?qū)?guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)提出了最新的要求,代表了國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的最新趨勢(shì)。ACTA與《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》(TRIPS)相比,既有一定的承繼關(guān)系,但又在很多方面提出了“超TRIPS"的要求。與我國(guó)現(xiàn)在的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度相比,ACTA在某些方面超越了中國(guó)現(xiàn)有的保護(hù)水平�？紤]到國(guó)際政治、產(chǎn)業(yè)政策等相關(guān)因素,中國(guó)在短期內(nèi)加入這一公約的可能性很小。但即便如此,ACTA仍將對(duì)我國(guó)的對(duì)外貿(mào)易產(chǎn)生重大影響,因此我國(guó)政府和企業(yè)應(yīng)當(dāng)做好應(yīng)對(duì)的準(zhǔn)備。 本文包括引言、正文、結(jié)論3部分。正文共4章。 第1章：反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定概述。鑒于ACTA是最新締結(jié)的國(guó)際條約,本章主要介紹了ACTA制定的背景、新引入知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的主要內(nèi)容、ACTA的特征等。 第2章：反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定與TRIPS協(xié)議的關(guān)系。在目前的國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)體系中,TRIPS協(xié)議占有最重要的地位。由于ACTA是在TRIPS協(xié)議的基礎(chǔ)上的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,所以他們之間存在一定的繼承關(guān)系。但在具體的執(zhí)法措施中,ACTA又具有很多新亮點(diǎn)。 第3章：反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定與我國(guó)現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)法律制度的比較。雖然目前看來(lái),我國(guó)加入ACTA的可能性甚微,但發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家不會(huì)允許我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期游離于該協(xié)定之外。所以,本章主要是對(duì)ACTA與我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法進(jìn)行了比較研究。 第4章：反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定可能產(chǎn)生的影響及我國(guó)的對(duì)策。ACTA作為國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的最新實(shí)踐,其本身創(chuàng)造了很多新的規(guī)定,將對(duì)國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)和國(guó)際貿(mào)易發(fā)展產(chǎn)生重要影響。由于美國(guó)、歐盟是我國(guó)最重要的貿(mào)易伙伴,即使我國(guó)不加入ACTA,協(xié)定本身也會(huì)對(duì)我國(guó)的對(duì)外貿(mào)易產(chǎn)生重要影響,所以本章從政府和企業(yè)兩個(gè)角度,提出了一些粗淺的應(yīng)對(duì)之策。
[Abstract]:The Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is the latest intellectual property agreement concluded in 2011 by the United States, European Union, Japan and other intellectual property powers. The Convention puts forward the latest requirements for the protection of international intellectual property rights in the areas of civil tort relief, border measures, criminal liability, law enforcement in the digital environment and international cooperation. ACTA represents the latest trend of international intellectual property protection. Compared with (TRIPS), there is a certain inheritance relationship, but the requirement of "super TRIPS" is put forward in many aspects. Compared with the current intellectual property legal system in China, ACTA has surpassed the existing level of protection in some respects. In view of international politics, industrial policy and other related factors, China is unlikely to join the treaty in the near future. But even so, ACTA will still have a great impact on China's foreign trade, so our government and enterprises should be prepared to deal with it. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text consists of four chapters. Chapter 1: Overview of anti-counterfeiting trade agreements. In view of the fact that ACTA is the newly concluded international treaty, this chapter mainly introduces the background of the establishment of ACTA, the main content of the newly introduced intellectual property protection system and the characteristics of ACTA. Chapter 2: the relationship between anti-counterfeiting trade agreement and TRIPS agreement. Trips occupies the most important position in the current international intellectual property protection system. Because ACTA is further developed on the basis of TRIPS protocol, there is a certain inheritance relationship between them. But in the specific law enforcement measures ACTA also has a lot of new highlights. Chapter 3: the comparison between anti-counterfeiting trade agreement and our current intellectual property law system. Although there is little possibility of China joining ACTA, the developed countries will not allow China to stay out of the agreement for a long time. Therefore, this chapter is mainly about the comparative study of ACTA and intellectual property law of our country. Chapter 4: the possible impact of anti-counterfeiting trade agreements and our countermeasures. ACTA, as the latest practice of international intellectual property protection, has itself created many new regulations. Will have an important impact on the protection of international intellectual property rights and the development of international trade. As the United States and the European Union are the most important trading partners of our country, even if China does not join the ACTA, agreement itself, it will have an important impact on China's foreign trade. Therefore, this chapter puts forward some countermeasures from the two angles of government and enterprise.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D996.1;D997.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉科;;中國(guó)貫徹《TRIPS協(xié)定》刑事措施中的若干問(wèn)題[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 馮漢橋;;對(duì)外貿(mào)易中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法與司法保護(hù)協(xié)調(diào)問(wèn)題研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年12期

3 衣淑玲;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》談判述評(píng)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年07期

4 薛潔;;走近《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》(ACTA) 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事執(zhí)法部分初探[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年07期

5 袁真富;鄭舒姝;徐洋;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的主要特點(diǎn)及其現(xiàn)實(shí)影響[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

6 崔國(guó)斌;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》與中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的比較研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

7 程文婷;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》與我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法比較芻議[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

8 萬(wàn)鄂湘,馮潔菡;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際保護(hù)的新發(fā)展[J];法律適用;2003年07期

9 楊鴻;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法規(guī)則研究[J];法商研究;2011年06期

10 李宗輝;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》(ACTA)的“表”與“里”[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：2250113