商事仲裁調(diào)解中的新問(wèn)題及其對(duì)策分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-03 15:04
【摘要】：英國(guó)大法官M(fèi)ichael Kerr曾經(jīng)說(shuō)過(guò)：“我對(duì)訴訟的看法已經(jīng)改變，將來(lái)是屬于替代性糾紛解決方式（ADR）的。”的確，越來(lái)越多的國(guó)家開(kāi)始重視ADR的構(gòu)建，相關(guān)立法亦逐步得到完善。例如中國(guó)，2009年最高人民法院所出臺(tái)的《最高人民法院關(guān)于建立健全訴訟與非訴訟相銜接的矛盾糾紛解決機(jī)制的若干意見(jiàn)》就明確地表示在充分發(fā)揮審判權(quán)的規(guī)范，引導(dǎo)和監(jiān)督作用的前提下，促進(jìn)如仲裁，調(diào)解等非訴訟糾紛解決方式的發(fā)展，為社會(huì)提供更多元化的糾紛解決方式。商事仲裁中的調(diào)解方式作為中國(guó)首創(chuàng)的ADR方式，正受到越來(lái)越多國(guó)家地區(qū)以及仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的接受與適用，因此中國(guó)更應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)一步完善商事仲裁中的調(diào)解的立法，修正現(xiàn)有問(wèn)題，為世界提供更多先進(jìn)的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)。而本文正是以商事仲裁中的調(diào)解為主題，首先從學(xué)理方面探討其合法性與優(yōu)勢(shì)，其次對(duì)仲裁員與當(dāng)事人在實(shí)際適用商事仲裁中調(diào)解的過(guò)程中可能會(huì)面對(duì)的問(wèn)題作出分析，并提供解決方案；最后本文還將通過(guò)分析各國(guó)以及各仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)商事仲裁中調(diào)解的相關(guān)立法，提出中國(guó)現(xiàn)行法的不足，并嘗試給出自己的建議。 本文主要包括五章內(nèi)容。第一章為“商事仲裁中的調(diào)解”，其中包括兩小節(jié)：第一節(jié)將會(huì)對(duì)仲裁調(diào)解的概念以及發(fā)展歷史作簡(jiǎn)要的介紹；第二節(jié)為本章的主要內(nèi)容，將會(huì)詳細(xì)介紹學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)仲裁調(diào)解正面與負(fù)面的爭(zhēng)論。 本文第二章至第四章為仲裁員以及仲裁當(dāng)事人在仲裁過(guò)程中適用仲裁調(diào)解時(shí)所必須注意以及明晰的三個(gè)問(wèn)題。第二章為“仲裁調(diào)解的棄權(quán)問(wèn)題”，，它是仲裁調(diào)解能夠得以適用的最重要的前提條件，因?yàn)楫?dāng)事人若想適用仲裁調(diào)解，首要條件便是要放棄對(duì)仲裁員兼任調(diào)解員的異議權(quán)（第一節(jié)）；其次，由于調(diào)解具有保密性，因此當(dāng)事人也應(yīng)當(dāng)授權(quán)仲裁員在擔(dān)任調(diào)解員時(shí)不對(duì)其所獲得的保密信息向仲裁當(dāng)事人披露，也就是第二節(jié)所說(shuō)的對(duì)仲裁員的揭露義務(wù)的放棄。第三章為“仲裁調(diào)解中的公共政策問(wèn)題”，該問(wèn)題集中體現(xiàn)在三點(diǎn)上，同時(shí)也是本章中三小節(jié)的內(nèi)容，分別是：第一節(jié)公共政策的概念，第二節(jié)仲裁調(diào)解中的偏袒問(wèn)題，以及第三節(jié)中的仲裁調(diào)解與自然公正的問(wèn)題。本文的第四章是有關(guān)仲裁調(diào)解中調(diào)解涉及第三人利益的問(wèn)題，第一節(jié)將會(huì)舉列三種有可能涉及第三人利益的情況；第二節(jié)將會(huì)討論現(xiàn)有的救濟(jì)方式是否能夠給予第三人充分的保障。 第五章“完善仲裁調(diào)解的思考與對(duì)策”是本文的最末一章。第一節(jié)將會(huì)主要介紹各國(guó)以及仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)有關(guān)仲裁調(diào)解的立法與規(guī)則，并找出能夠借鑒的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)；第二節(jié)主要圍繞著如何完善我國(guó)仲裁調(diào)解的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行，探討我國(guó)現(xiàn)存的相關(guān)法律的缺陷并試圖給出有用的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Lord Chancellor Michael Kerr once said: "my view of litigation has changed, and in the future it will be (ADR), an alternative dispute resolution." Indeed, more and more countries begin to attach importance to the construction of ADR, and the relevant legislation has been gradually improved. For example, in China, in 2009, the Supreme people's Court's opinions on establishing and perfecting a mechanism for resolving contradictions and disputes linking litigation and non-litigation clearly indicated that the Supreme people's Court was giving full play to the norms of judicial power. Under the premise of guidance and supervision, we should promote the development of non-litigation dispute resolution methods such as arbitration and mediation, and provide more diversified dispute resolution methods for the society. As the first ADR method in China, mediation in commercial arbitration is accepted and applied by more and more countries and arbitration institutions. Therefore, China should further perfect the mediation legislation in commercial arbitration and correct the existing problems. To provide the world with more advanced legislative experience. In this paper, the mediation in commercial arbitration as the theme, first from the theoretical aspects of its legitimacy and advantages, and secondly to the arbitrators and parties in the actual application of commercial arbitration mediation may face the problems. Finally, by analyzing the relevant legislation of mediation in commercial arbitration in various countries and arbitration institutions, this paper puts forward the deficiencies of China's current law and tries to give its own suggestions. This paper mainly includes five chapters. Chapter one is "Conciliation in Commercial Arbitration", which consists of two sections: the first section will give a brief introduction to the concept and history of arbitration conciliation, and the second section will be the main content of this chapter. This paper will introduce the positive and negative arguments of arbitration mediation in academic circles in detail. The second to fourth chapters are the three problems that should be paid attention to and clear when arbitrators and arbitration parties apply arbitration conciliation in the process of arbitration. The second chapter is entitled "waiver of arbitration conciliation", which is the most important precondition for arbitration conciliation to be applicable, because if the parties want to apply arbitration conciliation, The first condition is to waive the right to challenge the arbitrators acting concurrently as conciliators (sect. I); secondly, because of the confidentiality of conciliation, Therefore, the parties should also authorize arbitrators to act as conciliators without disclosing the confidential information they have obtained to the parties to the arbitration, that is, the waiver of the disclosure obligation of the arbitrators referred to in section II. The third chapter is "the public policy question in the arbitration mediation", which is embodied in three aspects, and it is also the content of the three subsections in this chapter, namely, the concept of public policy in the first section, and the favouritism in the arbitration mediation in the second section. And the third section of arbitration mediation and natural justice. The fourth chapter is about the third party's interests in the mediation of arbitration, the first section will list three possible cases involving the interests of the third party; Section II will discuss whether existing remedies can provide adequate protection to third parties. The fifth chapter is the last chapter of this paper. The first section will mainly introduce the legislation and rules of arbitration mediation in various countries and arbitration institutions, and find out the advanced experience that can be used for reference. The second section will focus on how to perfect the arbitration mediation in our country. This paper probes into the defects of the existing relevant laws in China and tries to give some useful legislative suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.4
本文編號(hào)：2220327
[Abstract]:Lord Chancellor Michael Kerr once said: "my view of litigation has changed, and in the future it will be (ADR), an alternative dispute resolution." Indeed, more and more countries begin to attach importance to the construction of ADR, and the relevant legislation has been gradually improved. For example, in China, in 2009, the Supreme people's Court's opinions on establishing and perfecting a mechanism for resolving contradictions and disputes linking litigation and non-litigation clearly indicated that the Supreme people's Court was giving full play to the norms of judicial power. Under the premise of guidance and supervision, we should promote the development of non-litigation dispute resolution methods such as arbitration and mediation, and provide more diversified dispute resolution methods for the society. As the first ADR method in China, mediation in commercial arbitration is accepted and applied by more and more countries and arbitration institutions. Therefore, China should further perfect the mediation legislation in commercial arbitration and correct the existing problems. To provide the world with more advanced legislative experience. In this paper, the mediation in commercial arbitration as the theme, first from the theoretical aspects of its legitimacy and advantages, and secondly to the arbitrators and parties in the actual application of commercial arbitration mediation may face the problems. Finally, by analyzing the relevant legislation of mediation in commercial arbitration in various countries and arbitration institutions, this paper puts forward the deficiencies of China's current law and tries to give its own suggestions. This paper mainly includes five chapters. Chapter one is "Conciliation in Commercial Arbitration", which consists of two sections: the first section will give a brief introduction to the concept and history of arbitration conciliation, and the second section will be the main content of this chapter. This paper will introduce the positive and negative arguments of arbitration mediation in academic circles in detail. The second to fourth chapters are the three problems that should be paid attention to and clear when arbitrators and arbitration parties apply arbitration conciliation in the process of arbitration. The second chapter is entitled "waiver of arbitration conciliation", which is the most important precondition for arbitration conciliation to be applicable, because if the parties want to apply arbitration conciliation, The first condition is to waive the right to challenge the arbitrators acting concurrently as conciliators (sect. I); secondly, because of the confidentiality of conciliation, Therefore, the parties should also authorize arbitrators to act as conciliators without disclosing the confidential information they have obtained to the parties to the arbitration, that is, the waiver of the disclosure obligation of the arbitrators referred to in section II. The third chapter is "the public policy question in the arbitration mediation", which is embodied in three aspects, and it is also the content of the three subsections in this chapter, namely, the concept of public policy in the first section, and the favouritism in the arbitration mediation in the second section. And the third section of arbitration mediation and natural justice. The fourth chapter is about the third party's interests in the mediation of arbitration, the first section will list three possible cases involving the interests of the third party; Section II will discuss whether existing remedies can provide adequate protection to third parties. The fifth chapter is the last chapter of this paper. The first section will mainly introduce the legislation and rules of arbitration mediation in various countries and arbitration institutions, and find out the advanced experience that can be used for reference. The second section will focus on how to perfect the arbitration mediation in our country. This paper probes into the defects of the existing relevant laws in China and tries to give some useful legislative suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.4
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 曹志勛;;我國(guó)仲裁調(diào)解案外人救濟(jì)途徑評(píng)述[J];北京仲裁;2011年01期
2 王小莉;;仲裁調(diào)解書(shū)有關(guān)法律問(wèn)題辨析[J];仲裁研究;2008年04期
本文編號(hào)：2220327
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2220327.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
