【摘要】：選擇ICSID仲裁已經(jīng)成為通行的國際投資爭議解決方式。ICSID公約第25條(2)(b)為擴大公約的屬人效力范圍,賦予具有外國控制因素的東道國法人投資者以另一締約國國籍,但公約本身對法人東道國國籍的認定、外國控制的形式和程度,以及功能性國籍協(xié)議的具體表現(xiàn)形式等付之闕如,學(xué)者學(xué)說和ICSID仲裁實踐歧異紛呈。法人投資者的東道國國籍應(yīng)當(dāng)依據(jù)東道國國內(nèi)法及相關(guān)國際條約予以認定,而其功能性國籍則需滿足ICSID公約的客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn),功能性國籍協(xié)議并不限于明示的書面形式。
[Abstract]:Article 25 (2) (b) of the ICSID Convention expands the scope of personal effect of the Convention by granting the nationality of another Contracting State to the legal person investor of the host country with foreign control factors, but the Convention itself recognizes the nationality of the host country of the legal person, the form and degree of foreign control, and For example, there are divergences between scholars'theories and ICSID arbitration practice. The nationality of the host country of a legal person investor should be determined according to the domestic law of the host country and relevant international treaties, while its functional nationality should meet the objective standards of ICSID convention. Functional nationality agreement is not limited to express. Written form.
【作者單位】： 華北電力大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科規(guī)劃基金(10YJA820121)
【分類號】：D996.4

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 楊衛(wèi)東;郭X;;論投資者功能性國籍沖突及其解決——基于中外雙邊投資保護協(xié)定的分析[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

，

本文編號：2206958