歐盟針對中國反傾銷調(diào)查相關(guān)問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-25 07:43
【摘要】：加入世界貿(mào)易組織,不僅給中國帶來了許多機遇同時也帶來了更多挑戰(zhàn)。在全球經(jīng)濟都呈現(xiàn)發(fā)展放緩甚至衰退的今天,中國的對外貿(mào)易總量及經(jīng)濟總量卻保持著高速穩(wěn)定的發(fā)展。歐盟作為世界上最大的經(jīng)濟體,是目前中國最大的貿(mào)易合作伙伴。與此同時,歐盟是世界上對中國發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查最多的地區(qū)。大量的反傾銷調(diào)查不僅損害了中國出口企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟利益,也對整個中國出口產(chǎn)業(yè)造成了嚴重影響。由于歐盟經(jīng)濟的持續(xù)衰退,歐盟的貿(mào)易保護傾向越來越嚴重,這意味著針對中國發(fā)起的反傾銷調(diào)查將會越來越多。中國目前還處在應對反傾銷調(diào)查的初期階段,中國政府與企業(yè)都缺乏相關(guān)經(jīng)驗和相關(guān)法律人才。因此,深入了解歐盟的反傾銷法規(guī)并找準應對的方法是首要任務。 本文通過對大量的反傾銷案例進行分析,深入發(fā)掘了歐盟在認定中國企業(yè)存在傾銷時的重要依據(jù)與原則。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)中國的“非市場經(jīng)濟地位”是中國與歐盟在面對反傾銷調(diào)查時最大的分歧點。本文首先通過運用經(jīng)濟學的數(shù)據(jù)分析方法如規(guī)范分析法與實證分析法,結(jié)合橫向分析與縱向分析對近幾年中歐之間的貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)及反傾銷調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)進行分類與比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)歐盟針對中國發(fā)起的反傾銷調(diào)查存在快速增長、肯定性終裁率高及涉案產(chǎn)品范圍廣、特定產(chǎn)品數(shù)量大的特點。同時發(fā)現(xiàn)中國企業(yè)難以在傾銷認定時獲得歐盟認可的“市場經(jīng)濟地位”。面對這樣的特點,筆者通過具體案例對歐盟的《反傾銷條例》中關(guān)于“市場經(jīng)濟地位”認定的五條標準進行了深入的剖析。其次,筆者對中國的市場經(jīng)濟地位進行了全方位的肯定性論證。最后,針對“非市場經(jīng)濟地位”這一爭議點筆者分別給出了針對中國政府及企業(yè)的對策。
[Abstract]:China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) has not only brought China many opportunities, but also brought more challenges. Today, when the global economy is slowing down or even declining, China's foreign trade volume and total economic volume maintain a rapid and stable development. As the world's largest economy, the EU is currently China's largest trading partner. At the same time, the European Union is the world's largest anti-dumping investigation against China. A large number of anti-dumping investigations not only hurt the economic interests of China's export enterprises, but also have a serious impact on the entire Chinese export industry. As the European Union's economy continues to decline, the EU's tendency to protect trade is growing, which means more anti-dumping investigations will be launched against China. China is still in the early stage of dealing with anti-dumping investigations, and the Chinese government and enterprises lack relevant experience and relevant legal personnel. Therefore, the most important task is to understand EU anti-dumping regulations and to find out how to deal with them. Based on the analysis of a large number of anti-dumping cases, this paper explores the important basis and principles of the EU in determining the existence of dumping in Chinese enterprises. On this basis, the author finds that China's "non-market economy status" is the biggest divergence point between China and EU in the face of anti-dumping investigation. Firstly, this paper classifies and compares the trade data and anti-dumping investigation data between China and Europe in recent years by using economic data analysis methods such as normative analysis and empirical analysis, combining horizontal analysis and longitudinal analysis. It is found that the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the European Union against China has the characteristics of rapid growth, high positive final arbitration rate, wide range of products involved, and large quantity of specific products. At the same time, it is difficult for Chinese enterprises to obtain the "market economy status" recognized by the European Union when the dumping is confirmed. In the face of such characteristics, the author makes a thorough analysis of the five standards concerning the recognition of "market economy status" in the EU's Anti-dumping regulations through specific cases. Second, the author of the market economy status of China has all-round positive argument. Finally, aiming at the dispute of "non-market economy status", the author puts forward the countermeasures for Chinese government and enterprises respectively.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1;F752.02
本文編號：2202223
[Abstract]:China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) has not only brought China many opportunities, but also brought more challenges. Today, when the global economy is slowing down or even declining, China's foreign trade volume and total economic volume maintain a rapid and stable development. As the world's largest economy, the EU is currently China's largest trading partner. At the same time, the European Union is the world's largest anti-dumping investigation against China. A large number of anti-dumping investigations not only hurt the economic interests of China's export enterprises, but also have a serious impact on the entire Chinese export industry. As the European Union's economy continues to decline, the EU's tendency to protect trade is growing, which means more anti-dumping investigations will be launched against China. China is still in the early stage of dealing with anti-dumping investigations, and the Chinese government and enterprises lack relevant experience and relevant legal personnel. Therefore, the most important task is to understand EU anti-dumping regulations and to find out how to deal with them. Based on the analysis of a large number of anti-dumping cases, this paper explores the important basis and principles of the EU in determining the existence of dumping in Chinese enterprises. On this basis, the author finds that China's "non-market economy status" is the biggest divergence point between China and EU in the face of anti-dumping investigation. Firstly, this paper classifies and compares the trade data and anti-dumping investigation data between China and Europe in recent years by using economic data analysis methods such as normative analysis and empirical analysis, combining horizontal analysis and longitudinal analysis. It is found that the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the European Union against China has the characteristics of rapid growth, high positive final arbitration rate, wide range of products involved, and large quantity of specific products. At the same time, it is difficult for Chinese enterprises to obtain the "market economy status" recognized by the European Union when the dumping is confirmed. In the face of such characteristics, the author makes a thorough analysis of the five standards concerning the recognition of "market economy status" in the EU's Anti-dumping regulations through specific cases. Second, the author of the market economy status of China has all-round positive argument. Finally, aiming at the dispute of "non-market economy status", the author puts forward the countermeasures for Chinese government and enterprises respectively.
【學位授予單位】：西北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1;F752.02
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張文科,劉曉潔;非市場經(jīng)濟國家地位與對華反傾銷[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟與文化;2005年02期
2 王勝偉;;反傾銷非市場經(jīng)濟國家問題研究[J];江蘇技術(shù)師范學院學報;2010年01期
3 陳明聰;我國應對因非市場經(jīng)濟地位問題被反傾銷的對策[J];東南學術(shù);2003年04期
4 俞姣紅;;我國出口貿(mào)易風險的會計應對措施[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年07期
5 高鵬程;;論兩反調(diào)查程序共存時傾銷幅度確定過程中的價格調(diào)整——WTO規(guī)則和美國的實踐[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學刊;2008年04期
6 高維新;;歐盟對華反傾銷的經(jīng)濟影響及對策分析[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2010年05期
7 張芳 ,鄒俊;中國“非市場經(jīng)濟地位”問題研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2005年05期
8 吳總建;張小南;;我國出口產(chǎn)品遭受國外歧視性反傾銷的原因及應對策略[J];理論與改革;2006年06期
9 王美瑩;李雪;;試論中國的“非市場經(jīng)濟地位”與對華反傾銷[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學學報(社會科學版);2010年04期
10 李金玲;李曉燕;;“非市場經(jīng)濟地位”相關(guān)問題的理論分析[J];前沿;2006年01期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條
1 方曙光;[N];財經(jīng)時報;2006年
2 外經(jīng)貿(mào)大學教授、中國WTO研究會副會長 薛榮久;[N];中國貿(mào)易報;2004年
，本文編號：2202223
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2202223.html
