【摘要】：保護責任是二十一世紀初才出現(xiàn)的新鮮概念和理論,目的為解決國家主權與國際干預之間的潛在沖突提供一個的新出路。它涉及國際法原則、人道主義干涉、聯(lián)合國集體安全體制等重大問題而且在短時間內就引起了國際社會的重視,也成為國際法學亟需研究的前沿課題。 本文由引言、正文三章及結論組成。 引言部分簡要介紹了選題的目的和意義、研究方法。 第一章全面的分析和梳理了保護責任產生的背景、原因、思想基礎以及演變的過程。本章首先分析了人道主義干涉所遭遇的理論與現(xiàn)實困境,并指出這是保護責任產生的關鍵背景。接著第二部分研究了保護責任的產生根源是人權的國際保護日益發(fā)展,人類安全觀和“作為責任的主權”思想構成保護責任的思想基礎。最后一節(jié)分別介紹和探討了保護責任在主要國際文件中的表述和演變。 第二章主要是對保護責任理論的主要內容進行法律分析。第一節(jié)著重探析保護責任所主張的內容在現(xiàn)有國際法規(guī)范中的法律依據(jù)和基礎,通過比較分析指出保護責任所應適用的范圍。第二節(jié)詳細地分析了《保護的責任》報告所提出預防的責任、反應的責任、重建的責任核心內容,重點研究了在極端情況下軍事干預的六條標準。 第三章是本文的重點,結合世界首腦會議之后保護責任在聯(lián)合國大會、安理會新近發(fā)展,研究和分析了目前保護責任對國際主權原則、不干涉內政原則、人道主義干涉的影響,并從法理的角度分析了當前保護責任在國際法上的地位問題。 結論部分作者總結了全文的主要觀點。作者認為,保護責任的諸多內容本身根植于已有的國際法之中,它所主張的有關國際干預的規(guī)范對國際法產生了一些影響而非實質性的改變。目前,保護責任還不是一個明確的法律概念和法律原則,也沒有形成稱之為保護責任的國際法規(guī)范。
[Abstract]:The responsibility to protect (R2P) is a new concept and theory that emerged in the early 21 century. It aims to provide a new way to solve the potential conflict between national sovereignty and international intervention. It involves the principles of international law, humanitarian intervention, the United Nations collective security system and other important issues, and in a short period of time has attracted the attention of the international community, and has become an international law needs to be the forefront of research topics. This paper consists of introduction, three chapters and conclusions. The introduction briefly introduces the purpose and significance of the topic, research methods. The first chapter comprehensively analyzes and combs the background, reasons, ideological basis and evolution process of R2P. This chapter first analyzes the theoretical and practical difficulties encountered by humanitarian intervention, and points out that this is the key background of R2P. Then the second part studies the origin of the responsibility to protect is the development of the international protection of human rights, the concept of human security and the idea of "sovereignty as responsibility" constitute the ideological basis of the responsibility to protect. The last section introduces and discusses the expression and evolution of R2P in the main international documents. The second chapter mainly analyzes the main content of R2P theory. The first section focuses on the legal basis and foundation of the content advocated by the responsibility to protect in the existing norms of international law, and points out the scope of application of the responsibility to protect through comparative analysis. The second section analyzes in detail the responsibility of prevention, the responsibility to react, and the core content of the responsibility for reconstruction, and focuses on the six criteria for military intervention in extreme cases. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, combined with the recent development of the responsibility to protect in the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council after the World Summit, the impact of the current responsibility to protect on the principles of international sovereignty, non-interference in internal affairs and humanitarian intervention is studied and analyzed. It also analyzes the status of R2P in international law from the angle of legal theory. In conclusion, the author summarizes the main points of the paper. The author holds that many elements of the responsibility to protect are rooted in existing international law and that the norms of international intervention which it advocates have had some influence on international law rather than substantial changes. At present, R2P is not a clear legal concept and principle, nor has it formed a norm of international law called R2P.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D990

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 楊澤偉;人道主義干涉在國際法中的地位[J];法學研究;2000年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張中新;冷戰(zhàn)后國際人道主義干預問題探析[D];武漢大學;2005年

，

本文編號：2159515