【摘要】：2002年7月1日，作為人類社會第一個常設(shè)性的國際刑事審判機(jī)構(gòu)——國際刑事法院在經(jīng)過多國長期的討論、爭議與最終的妥協(xié)之下正式成立了。新成立的國際刑事法院被國際社會寄予厚望，聯(lián)合國前秘書長科菲·安南曾說：“國際刑事法院的建立是對未來一代之希望的饋贈，并在通向普遍的人權(quán)與法制進(jìn)程中邁出了巨大的一步。”事實上，國際刑事法院成立本身就具有重大意義，它是國際刑事法律發(fā)展史上里程碑式的事件。從籌備建立到正式成立到開始工作，對國際刑事法院相關(guān)問題的研究引起了世界各國政府和學(xué)者的高度關(guān)注，他們的研究涉及法院運(yùn)作的多個方面。盡管如此，這些研究也主要是集中在法院管轄權(quán)問題部分。鑒于目前學(xué)者對管轄權(quán)等問題的研究已比較深入和全面，而對法院判決與相關(guān)裁決的執(zhí)行問題研究較少，本文旨在對此問題進(jìn)行初步的研究�！秶H刑事法院羅馬規(guī)約》第十編和《程序和證據(jù)規(guī)則》第十二章對判決的執(zhí)行作了比較詳細(xì)的規(guī)定，，本文將在此基礎(chǔ)上研究分析。研究判決的執(zhí)行問題也并不是只局限于有關(guān)執(zhí)行的規(guī)定，而是結(jié)合《羅馬規(guī)約》與《程序和證據(jù)規(guī)則》對法院的管轄權(quán)、刑罰、國際合作與司法協(xié)助等多方面的規(guī)定進(jìn)行。本文通過對法院管轄權(quán)的簡單介紹，對法院判決執(zhí)行的內(nèi)容即刑罰的執(zhí)行進(jìn)行體系化的分析，并對法院在執(zhí)行中遭遇的困境及其原因以及有關(guān)的完善措施闡述了自己的觀點。研究國際刑事法院判決執(zhí)行的問題有助于發(fā)現(xiàn)和解決判決執(zhí)行過程中遇到的實際問題，實現(xiàn)法院懲罰犯罪、保障人權(quán)的目的。 本文除了引言和結(jié)語以外主要由三部分組成。引言部分簡單介紹了本文的選題背景與選題意義，文章所引用的主要文獻(xiàn)的綜述情況和本文的研究思路與研究方法。 第一部分是國際刑事法院的概述。在這部分里，首先介紹了設(shè)立國際刑事法院的歷史背景，包括自一戰(zhàn)以來設(shè)立的國際軍事法庭和由聯(lián)合國安理會設(shè)立的國際刑事法庭以及之后的一些特別法庭�，F(xiàn)實是歷史的重復(fù)，歷史總是能對現(xiàn)實生活產(chǎn)生巨大的影響，了解歷史有利于解決現(xiàn)實存在的問題，國際刑事問題當(dāng)然也不例外。其次是對國際刑事法院的醞釀、誕生以及開始運(yùn)作的詳細(xì)闡述。本部分最后是對國際刑事法院的管轄權(quán)作了簡單介紹。 文章的第二部分是本文的核心內(nèi)容之一，主要是對國際刑事法院判決執(zhí)行問題的深入研究。法院判決的執(zhí)行主要表現(xiàn)為刑罰的執(zhí)行，本文即是依此原理以《國際刑事法院羅馬規(guī)約》和《程序和證據(jù)規(guī)則》的規(guī)定為基礎(chǔ)，分析研究判決的執(zhí)行問題，包括刑罰執(zhí)行的目的，判決執(zhí)行的主體、對象、時效，不同刑種的執(zhí)行以及減刑制度等。 本文的第三部分是對國際刑事法院判決執(zhí)行的現(xiàn)實情況、遭遇的問題、產(chǎn)生問題的原因的分析，并且提出一些筆者認(rèn)為可行的加強(qiáng)國際刑事法院判決執(zhí)行力措施的建議。但是，有關(guān)國際刑事法院執(zhí)行問題的案例很少，相關(guān)理論研究也很少，與判決有關(guān)的幾乎沒有。因此，本文將在資料極為有限的基礎(chǔ)上作出對國際刑事法院判決執(zhí)行問題很有局限的研究。 結(jié)語部分則是對整篇文章內(nèi)容的總結(jié)和對國際刑事法院判決執(zhí)行問題在未來順利解決與發(fā)展的展望。
[Abstract]:In July 1, 2002, the International Criminal Court, the first International Criminal Court of human society - the International Criminal Court (ICC) was formally established after a long period of discussion, dispute and final compromise. The newly established international criminal court was given great expectations by the international community. The former Secretary General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, said: "international criminal law." The establishment of the court is a gift to the hope of the future generation and a great step in the process of leading to universal human rights and the rule of law. "In fact, the establishment of the International Criminal Court itself is of great significance. It is a milestone in the history of the development of international criminal law. The research on the issues related to the Criminal Court has aroused the high attention of governments and scholars all over the world. Their research involves many aspects of the operation of the court. However, these studies are mainly focused on the jurisdiction of the court. In view of the current scholars' research on the jurisdiction and other issues is more thorough and comprehensive, and the court is judged by the court. There are few studies on the implementation of the related adjudication. This article is intended to make a preliminary study on this issue. The tenth edition of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court and the twelfth chapter of the rules of procedure and evidence have made a more detailed provision on the execution of the decision. This article will be based on this study. The question of the execution of the judgment is not a single Bureau. It is limited to the provisions relating to implementation, but in combination with the provisions of the Rome statute and the rules of procedure and evidence on the jurisdiction of the court, the penalty, the international cooperation and judicial assistance. This article, through a simple introduction to the jurisdiction of the court, systematically analyses the execution of the court's judgment, namely the execution of the penalty penalty, and to the court The problems encountered in the implementation and its reasons as well as the relevant measures are expounded. The study of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court will help to find and solve the practical problems encountered in the execution of the judgment, and to realize the purpose of the court to punish the crime and protect the human rights.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper mainly consists of three parts. The introduction briefly introduces the background and significance of the topic, the summary of the main literature cited in the article and the research ideas and research methods of this article.
The first part is the overview of the International Criminal Court. In this section, it first introduces the historical background of the establishment of the International Criminal Court, including the international military tribunals established since the first World War and the international criminal tribunals established by the United Nations Security Council, as well as some special courts after the United Nations Security Council. There is a great influence on life, the understanding of history is conducive to the solution of the existing problems, and the international criminal problem is certainly no exception. The second is a detailed exposition of the brew, birth and operation of the International Criminal Court. This part is the final introduction to the jurisdiction of the international criminal court.
The second part of the article is one of the core contents of this article, which is mainly the study of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court. The execution of the court's judgment is mainly embodied in the execution of the penalty. This article is based on the principles of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court and the regulations of the procedure and the rules of evidence. The problems include the purpose of penalty execution, the subject of judgment execution, object, prescription, execution of different kinds of punishment and commutation system.
The third part of this article is the analysis of the actual situation of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court, the problems encountered, the cause of the problem, and some suggestions that the author thinks feasible to strengthen the enforcement of the International Criminal Court. However, there are few cases about the implementation of the International Criminal Court, and the relevant theoretical research is also very important. Few, little related to the verdict. Therefore, this article will make a very limited study on the question of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court on the basis of very limited information.
The conclusion part is the summary of the whole article and the prospect of the successful implementation and settlement of the International Criminal Court decision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 黃風(fēng);國際刑事司法協(xié)助中的被判刑人移管[J];比較法研究;1990年04期

2 李雪平;《羅馬規(guī)約》與國際刑事法院面臨的法律問題[J];法學(xué)評論;2002年06期

3 陸蓉;;國際刑事法院審判執(zhí)行的法律問題分析[J];廣西廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年01期

4 吳曉丹;;國際司法機(jī)構(gòu)判決的執(zhí)行監(jiān)督機(jī)制[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期

5 羅國強(qiáng);;國際刑事法院的管轄權(quán)與執(zhí)行權(quán)問題——評蘇丹總統(tǒng)逮捕令事件[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

6 Pierre-Gilles Belanger,趙秉志,王秀梅;國際刑事法院的批準(zhǔn)與執(zhí)行——《國際刑事法院規(guī)約》中規(guī)定的執(zhí)行義務(wù):加拿大的實踐[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年03期

7 楊力軍;《國際刑事法院羅馬規(guī)約》淺析[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2003年02期

8 龍宗智;國際刑事法院檢察官的地位與功能研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年03期

9 朱文奇;國際刑事法院的成立和國際刑法的發(fā)展[J];政治與法律;2003年01期

本文編號：2154119