【摘要】：19世紀(jì)60年代,伴隨著資本主義國(guó)家對(duì)拉美國(guó)家的殖民投資,卡爾沃主義,作為反抗外國(guó)干涉、維護(hù)本國(guó)主權(quán)、保護(hù)本國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的理論被首次提出。自其提出以后，廣大拉美國(guó)家在其國(guó)內(nèi)立法、國(guó)際投資協(xié)議中紛紛訂立卡爾沃條款�？栁种髁x，不僅在當(dāng)時(shí)的拉美，甚至在世界其他國(guó)家，都具有影響力。隨著國(guó)際投資的發(fā)展，，卡爾沃主義逐漸被立法實(shí)踐所拋棄。然而，近年來(lái)，由于國(guó)際投資仲裁案件的突增，卡爾沃主義又有復(fù)蘇之勢(shì)。我國(guó)作為發(fā)展中國(guó)家，在有關(guān)國(guó)際投資的國(guó)內(nèi)立法及國(guó)際條約方面存在種種不足，通過(guò)對(duì)卡爾沃主義的研究，本文試圖為我國(guó)的國(guó)際投資立法的發(fā)展提供有益借鑒。 本文第一章是對(duì)卡爾沃主義的介紹。首先介紹了其產(chǎn)生背景及卡爾沃主義盛行的原因。然后通過(guò)對(duì)卡爾沃主義涵義的分析及同其他國(guó)際法原則的比較，來(lái)更清楚地理解19世紀(jì)60年代的卡爾沃主義。最后論述了卡爾沃主義對(duì)世界國(guó)際投資立法的影響及意義。 本文第二章，分析了卡爾沃主義誕生以后經(jīng)歷的興盛、低迷、復(fù)蘇三個(gè)不同階段，對(duì)其不同階段的時(shí)代背景、在立法司法中的不同體現(xiàn)以及對(duì)不同階段的時(shí)代意義進(jìn)行了分析。同時(shí)分析了不同時(shí)期各國(guó)對(duì)卡爾沃主義態(tài)度體現(xiàn)出的特點(diǎn)及其成因分析。 本文第三章，首先介紹了我國(guó)投資立法的架構(gòu)及特點(diǎn)，然后通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)不同時(shí)期國(guó)內(nèi)立法、國(guó)際條約的分析，闡述了卡爾沃主義在我國(guó)的發(fā)展階段，并通過(guò)分析我國(guó)目前國(guó)際投資立法中存在的問(wèn)題并結(jié)合當(dāng)今卡爾沃主義復(fù)蘇的趨勢(shì)，對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)際投資立法需做出的變革提出了建議。 在結(jié)論部分，作者通過(guò)對(duì)本文主要觀點(diǎn)的小結(jié)，指出現(xiàn)階段，我國(guó)立法司法實(shí)踐中，不能盲目的對(duì)卡爾沃主義進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單的否定或肯定而應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)不同情況做出區(qū)別對(duì)待，同時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)在今后的雙邊投資條約的簽訂中，加大對(duì)我國(guó)的保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:In the 1860s, along with the capitalist countries' colonial investment in Latin American countries, Carbo doctrine was put forward for the first time as a theory of resisting foreign interference, defending one's own sovereignty and protecting one's own economy. Since it was put forward, many Latin American countries have made Carbo clauses in their domestic legislation and international investment agreements. Carbo doctrine, not only in Latin America at the time, but also in the rest of the world. With the development of international investment, Carbo doctrine has been abandoned by legislative practice. However, in recent years, due to the sudden increase of international investment arbitration cases, Carbo doctrine is recovering. China, as a developing country, has a variety of deficiencies in domestic legislation and international treaties concerning international investment. Through the study of Carbo doctrine, this paper tries to provide useful reference for the development of international investment legislation in China. The first chapter is the introduction of Carbo doctrine. First of all, it introduces the background of its emergence and the reasons for the prevalence of Carbo doctrine. Then, by analyzing the meaning of Carbo doctrine and comparing it with other principles of international law, the author makes a clearer understanding of Carbo doctrine in the 1860s. Finally, it discusses the influence and significance of Carbo doctrine on international investment legislation in the world. In the second chapter, the author analyzes three different stages of Carbo doctrine: prosperity, depression and recovery, and analyzes the background of different stages, the different embodiment in legislation and judicature, and the significance of the times in different stages. At the same time, it analyzes the characteristics and causes of different countries' attitude towards Carbo in different periods. The third chapter introduces the structure and characteristics of China's investment legislation, and then through the analysis of domestic legislation and international treaties in different periods of our country, expounds the development stage of Carbo doctrine in our country. Based on the analysis of the existing problems in China's current international investment legislation and the trend of the revival of the current Carbo doctrine, the author puts forward some suggestions for the reform of China's international investment legislation. In the conclusion part, the author points out that in the present stage, we can not blindly negate or affirm Carbo doctrine by summarizing the main viewpoints of this paper, and we should treat it differently according to different situations. At the same time, we should strengthen the protection of our country in the signing of bilateral investment treaties in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 祝海燕;;論我國(guó)雙邊投資條約對(duì)ICSID管轄權(quán)的接受[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

2 魏艷茹;;論我國(guó)晚近全盤接受ICSID仲裁管轄權(quán)之欠妥[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2006年01期

3 單文華;張生;勞志健;;“卡爾沃主義”死了嗎[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2008年02期

4 王春婕;;卡爾沃主義的“復(fù)蘇”及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];理論學(xué)刊;2006年12期

5 杜萱;;試析用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)規(guī)則在國(guó)際投資法中的適用[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

6 單文華;張生;;從“南北矛盾”到“公私?jīng)_突”:卡爾沃主義的復(fù)蘇與國(guó)際投資法的新視野[J];西安交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 殷敏;外交保護(hù)法律制度及其發(fā)展勢(shì)態(tài)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

2 劉京蓮;阿根廷國(guó)際投資仲裁危機(jī)的法理與實(shí)踐研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭佳;論用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)原則[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2128787