本文選題：替代交易 + 價格差　； 參考：《法學(xué)》2017年09期

【摘要】：替代交易規(guī)則是指在債權(quán)人因?qū)Ψ街卮筮`約解除了合同并為了獲得與原合同相同的標的而與他人締約的情況下,如果替代交易的價格與原合同相比不利于債權(quán)人,其可以請求債務(wù)人賠償兩個合同的差價。在判斷系爭交易是否為替代交易時,應(yīng)考慮交易的時間、后來的交易是否與原合同服務(wù)于相同的利益等因素。為適當?shù)乇Ｗo債務(wù)人的利益,替代交易應(yīng)當在債權(quán)人發(fā)出解除通知后的合理時間內(nèi)以合理的方式進行。如果替代交易不合理,應(yīng)將交易價格替換為合理的價格。如果沒有可靠的根據(jù)進行替換,應(yīng)根據(jù)市場價格規(guī)則計算損失。
[Abstract]:The alternative transaction rule refers to the case in which the creditor terminates the contract because of the other party's material breach of contract and contracts with others in order to obtain the same subject matter as the original contract, if the price of the substitute transaction is not favourable to the creditor compared with the original contract, It may seek compensation from the debtor for the difference between the two contracts. When judging whether the competing transaction is a substitute transaction, we should consider the time of the transaction and whether the subsequent transaction serves the same interests as the original contract. To properly protect the debtor's interests, alternative transactions shall be conducted in a reasonable manner within a reasonable time after the creditor gives notice of discharge. If the substitution transaction is unreasonable, the transaction price shall be replaced by a reasonable price. If there is no reliable basis for replacement, the loss shall be calculated in accordance with the market price rules.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目“民法典背景下違約損害賠償制度的發(fā)展與完善研究”(項目編號:16BFX154)的階段性成果之一
【分類號】：D996
，

本文編號：2056379