本文選題：專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū) + 剩余權(quán)利�。� 參考：《中南民族大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》是一部海洋大憲章，，規(guī)范人類在海洋中的活動(dòng)，建立新的海洋秩序。作為第三次聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法會(huì)議的重要成果，其中專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)制度是公約新創(chuàng)設(shè)的重要制度之一。 海洋法中的剩余權(quán)利是指在《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》中沒有明文規(guī)定或規(guī)定模糊的權(quán)利。該公約中存在大量剩余權(quán)利，作為一攬子公約，這是各國(guó)相互博弈的結(jié)果，特別體現(xiàn)在專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)中。因?yàn)檫@一制度的建立是發(fā)展中國(guó)家同發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家經(jīng)過斗爭(zhēng)爭(zhēng)取而來，該制度實(shí)現(xiàn)海洋資源在海洋國(guó)和沿海國(guó)之間的合理分配。但發(fā)展中國(guó)家期望通過設(shè)立專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)來獲得更多海洋利益的初衷在面對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家強(qiáng)大海洋實(shí)力時(shí)未能實(shí)現(xiàn)。這就導(dǎo)致許多權(quán)利不可能清晰的界定甚至無法涉及，剩余權(quán)利也因此產(chǎn)生。 公約對(duì)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)制度做出規(guī)定，沿海國(guó)和其他國(guó)家各有其權(quán)利和義務(wù)。但由于公約對(duì)這些權(quán)利沒有細(xì)化，易使各國(guó)因?yàn)閷?duì)條文理解不同而引發(fā)爭(zhēng)議。本文旨在從共同合理利用海洋資源的角度出發(fā)，在公約的制度框架內(nèi)，探討專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)中存在的剩余權(quán)利問題以及由此引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)議，從而為解決在實(shí)踐中引發(fā)的沖突提出建議。 本文共分為四個(gè)部分。 第一部分介紹海洋法中剩余權(quán)利的概念，明確海洋法中的剩余權(quán)利是指《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》中的剩余權(quán)利，通過介紹公約中規(guī)定的基本制度來引出其中的剩余權(quán)利。 第二部分介紹專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)中剩余權(quán)利的具體表現(xiàn)。首先對(duì)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)制度進(jìn)行闡述，然后指出專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)中的剩余權(quán)利主要包括專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)與軍事利用有關(guān)的剩余權(quán)利、與海洋生物資源相關(guān)的剩余權(quán)利和與海洋環(huán)境保護(hù)相關(guān)的剩余權(quán)利。 第三部分是在公約已做出相關(guān)規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)中剩余權(quán)利的利用在實(shí)踐中所產(chǎn)生的爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行分析。 第四部分是提出解決實(shí)踐中爭(zhēng)議之原則和方法。其中原則包括堅(jiān)持軍事利用事先同意原則；充分尊重各國(guó)主權(quán)原則；堅(jiān)持國(guó)際合作原則等。解決方法涉及實(shí)行防空識(shí)別區(qū)制度、有限通過制度、加強(qiáng)國(guó)際合作等內(nèi)容。 海洋是全人類的共同資源，需要世界各國(guó)的尊重、珍惜和合理利用。為減少各國(guó)在實(shí)踐中的摩擦，構(gòu)建和諧的國(guó)際關(guān)系，有效利用海洋資源，應(yīng)當(dāng)用積極的態(tài)度面對(duì)剩余權(quán)利問題，同時(shí)也應(yīng)積極的尋求解決爭(zhēng)議之道，只有如此才是對(duì)待和利用海洋資源的最佳方式。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a marine Magna Carta that regulates human activities in the oceans and establishes a new marine order. As an important achievement of the third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, the system of exclusive economic zone is one of the important systems newly created by the Convention. The residual rights in the law of the sea refer to the rights which are not expressly stipulated or specified in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. There are a large number of residual rights in the convention, which is the result of the game between countries, especially in the exclusive economic zone. Because the establishment of this system is a result of the struggle between the developing countries and the developed countries, the system realizes the rational distribution of marine resources between the maritime and coastal States. But the original intention of developing countries to create exclusive economic zones to gain more marine benefits has failed to materialize in the face of the strong marine power of developed countries. As a result, many rights can not be clearly defined or even cannot be involved, and the remaining rights arise. The Convention provides for the exclusive economic zone system, coastal States and other countries have their own rights and obligations. However, because the Covenant does not detail these rights, it is easy for countries to dispute because of their different understandings of the articles. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the residual rights in the exclusive economic zone and the disputes arising therefrom from the point of view of common and reasonable utilization of marine resources, within the framework of the convention system, so as to put forward some suggestions for resolving the conflicts caused in practice. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the concept of residual rights in the law of the sea. It is clear that the residual rights in the law of the sea refer to the residual rights in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The second part introduces the specific performance of the residual rights in the exclusive economic zone. First of all, the system of exclusive economic zone is elaborated, and then it is pointed out that the residual rights in exclusive economic zone mainly include the residual rights in exclusive economic zone related to military utilization, Residual rights relating to marine living resources and residual rights relating to the protection of the marine environment. The third part analyzes the disputes arising from the use of residual rights in the exclusive economic zone on the basis of the relevant provisions of the convention. The fourth part is to put forward the principles and methods of resolving disputes in practice. The principles include upholding the principle of prior consent for military use, fully respecting the principle of sovereignty of all countries, and adhering to the principle of international cooperation. The solution involves the implementation of the air defense identification zone system, the limited adoption of the system and the strengthening of international cooperation. The ocean is the common resource of all mankind. It needs the respect, treasure and rational utilization of all countries in the world. In order to reduce the frictions in practice, build harmonious international relations and make effective use of marine resources, we should face the issue of residual rights with a positive attitude and actively seek solutions to disputes. Only in this way is the best way to treat and utilize marine resources.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D993.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王澤林;;論專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)的外國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年03期

2 周忠海;;論海洋科技發(fā)展與國(guó)家安全[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年10期

3 慕亞平,鄭艷;《海洋法公約》生效后的新形勢(shì)和我國(guó)面臨的問題與挑戰(zhàn)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年03期

4 金永明;;專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)軍事活動(dòng)問題與國(guó)家實(shí)踐[J];法學(xué);2008年03期

5 全永波;國(guó)際漁業(yè)制度與我國(guó)近海漁業(yè)的發(fā)展[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2002年04期

6 王志遠(yuǎn);;維護(hù)我國(guó)的海洋權(quán)益[J];紅旗文稿;2005年20期

7 尹年長(zhǎng);;論專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的國(guó)家主權(quán)權(quán)利[J];湛江海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

8 周忠海;;論專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)上空的法律地位[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

9 劉中民;;《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》生效的負(fù)面效應(yīng)分析[J];外交評(píng)論(外交學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年03期

10 李廣義;萬彬華;朱宏杰;;論專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)軍事活動(dòng)的權(quán)利與義務(wù)[J];西安政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 范曉莉;海洋環(huán)境保護(hù)的法律制度與國(guó)際合作[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2003年

2 陳威;論專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的剩余權(quán)利[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳明;海洋法中的剩余權(quán)利與我國(guó)海洋權(quán)益的保護(hù)[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年

2 黎興亞;《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》與當(dāng)代國(guó)際關(guān)系的互動(dòng)關(guān)系研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：2019998