本文選題：ADR + WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨世界貿(mào)易的繁榮發(fā)展，各國(guó)之間的貿(mào)易聯(lián)系日益密切，世紀(jì)貿(mào)易組織即WTO在國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)的合作與發(fā)展中發(fā)揮著日益重要的作用。它與IMF（國(guó)際貨幣基金組織），WB（世界銀行）一同被稱為當(dāng)今世界經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的“三大支柱”。1WTO在促進(jìn)各國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易發(fā)展的同時(shí)，也以其自身的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制來(lái)處理各國(guó)的貿(mào)易摩擦，然而各國(guó)的貿(mào)易形式及內(nèi)容多樣化、復(fù)雜化等一系列問(wèn)題使既有的單一爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制在處理爭(zhēng)議時(shí)顯得力不從心。ADR（alternative disputeresolution）作為一種簡(jiǎn)易、迅捷、便于操作的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制逐漸受到各貿(mào)易主體的親睞。文章旨?xì)w是將ADR與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的主要內(nèi)容予以介紹，反映出ADR的優(yōu)勢(shì)所在以及WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的弊端，進(jìn)而引申出ADR的存在是必要的這一中心論點(diǎn)。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于通過(guò)對(duì)ADR本身的介紹以及WTO中傳統(tǒng)的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的分析，總結(jié)出ADR較WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的運(yùn)行優(yōu)勢(shì)，從而分析為什么在當(dāng)前階段以及今后一個(gè)較長(zhǎng)時(shí)期內(nèi)ADR有其存在的必要性，進(jìn)而強(qiáng)調(diào)ADR在解決國(guó)際貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)議過(guò)程中的重要性。文章主要分為四個(gè)部分：第一部分主要是對(duì)ADR制度的一般概述。首先介紹ADR制度的概念，通過(guò)援引西方相關(guān)法律論著，對(duì)什么是ADR制度以及在定義過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的爭(zhēng)議做一個(gè)大致介紹，然后給出自己的意見。其次，闡述ADR制度的法律特征，，主要通過(guò)三個(gè)方面的敘述將其特征呈現(xiàn)出來(lái)。再次，說(shuō)明ADR的主要表現(xiàn)形式，通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)階段ADR在解決商事爭(zhēng)議中存在的具體形式進(jìn)行例舉，并對(duì)每種形式進(jìn)行大致介紹。最后，討論ADR與司法訴訟的關(guān)系，以求能對(duì)ADR做到相對(duì)正確的把握。第二部分主要是對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的一般概述。這部分將對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的主要內(nèi)容、特點(diǎn)以及適用范圍進(jìn)行介紹使讀者對(duì)該機(jī)制有一個(gè)比較客觀的認(rèn)識(shí)。第三部分著重介紹WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的局限性。第四部分分析WTO爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制中ADR的存在價(jià)值。主要從以下兩大方面入手。首先分析WTO合作協(xié)議框架下爭(zhēng)議的的特點(diǎn)與性質(zhì)，給出特點(diǎn)后進(jìn)而說(shuō)明多種解決爭(zhēng)議機(jī)制的存在對(duì)解決這些爭(zhēng)議的解決大有裨益。其次討論ADR自身的優(yōu)勢(shì)，通過(guò)文中第一部分的介紹總結(jié)出ADR相較WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的優(yōu)勢(shì)，而這部分優(yōu)勢(shì)能夠與傳統(tǒng)的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制做到互補(bǔ)。再次，分析ADR能夠?qū)嶋H發(fā)揮作用的可行性。主要從ADR的運(yùn)行成本及邊際成本結(jié)合當(dāng)前爭(zhēng)議解決實(shí)踐中積累的經(jīng)驗(yàn)說(shuō)明不單理論上可行而且實(shí)踐中必要。最后，對(duì)ADR與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的銜接給出合理化建議，以便使兩種機(jī)制能互相補(bǔ)充，充分發(fā)揮作用。
[Abstract]:With the prosperity and development of world trade, the trade relations between countries are becoming closer and closer. In the century, WTO is playing an increasingly important role in the cooperation and development of international economy. Together with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) WBB (World Bank), it has been called the "three pillars" of today's world economic development. The WTO, while promoting the economic and trade development of all countries, also uses its own dispute settlement mechanism to deal with trade frictions among countries. However, a series of problems, such as diversification and complexity of trade forms and contents of various countries, make the existing single dispute settlement mechanism seem unable to deal with disputes. The easy-to-operate dispute settlement mechanism is gradually favored by various trading bodies. The aim of this paper is to introduce the main contents of ADR and WTO dispute settlement mechanism, reflecting the advantages of ADR and the disadvantages of WTO dispute settlement mechanism, and then generalizing the central argument that the existence of ADR is necessary. The innovation of this paper is that through the introduction of ADR itself and the analysis of the traditional dispute settlement mechanism in WTO, the author concludes that ADR is superior to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism in operation. This paper analyzes why there is a necessity for ADR to exist in the present stage and for a long time to come, and then emphasizes the importance of ADR in the process of resolving international trade disputes. The article is divided into four parts: the first part is a general overview of the ADR system. This paper first introduces the concept of ADR system, then gives a general introduction of what is ADR system and the disputes arising in the process of definition, and then gives its own opinion. Secondly, it expounds the legal characteristics of ADR system, mainly through three aspects of narration to present its characteristics. Thirdly, it explains the main forms of ADR, through the current ADR in the settlement of commercial disputes in the specific form of examples, and the general introduction of each form. Finally, the relationship between ADR and judicial proceedings is discussed in order to grasp ADR correctly. The second part is the general overview of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This part will introduce the main content, characteristics and scope of application of WTO dispute settlement mechanism so that readers have a more objective understanding of the mechanism. The third part mainly introduces the limitation of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The fourth part analyzes the existence value of ADR in WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Mainly from the following two major aspects. This paper first analyzes the characteristics and properties of disputes under the framework of WTO cooperation agreement, and then explains that the existence of various dispute resolution mechanisms is of great benefit to the settlement of these disputes. Secondly, the advantages of ADR itself are discussed, and the advantages of ADR compared with WTO dispute settlement mechanism are summarized through the introduction of the first part of this paper, which can complement the traditional dispute settlement mechanism. Third, analyze the feasibility of ADR can actually play a role. Mainly from the operation cost and marginal cost of ADR combined with the experience accumulated in the current dispute settlement practice, it is not only feasible in theory but also necessary in practice. Finally, some reasonable suggestions on the connection between ADR and WTO dispute settlement mechanism are given in order to make the two mechanisms complement each other and play a full role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 渠邕;;國(guó)際法框架下的人民幣匯率制度選擇[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2007年03期

2 崔自力;中外陪審制度比較研究[J];洛陽(yáng)工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

3 高洪賓;;調(diào)解協(xié)議問(wèn)題研究[J];人民司法;2006年06期

4 沈松,郭明磊;論美國(guó)替代性爭(zhēng)議解決方式中的調(diào)解[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

5 薛冰;;論WTO框架下ADR爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的完善[J];行政與法;2010年07期

6 余妙宏;;淺析和諧社會(huì)及替代性糾紛解決機(jī)制在我國(guó)的重構(gòu)[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2005年06期

7 劉美蓉;律師與ADR探析[J];云南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

8 李科;;論執(zhí)行和解協(xié)議之執(zhí)行力[J];政治與法律;2008年11期

本文編號(hào)：1974996