本文選題：國際勞工法 + 國際勞工保護(hù)��； 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題是近十幾年來國際社會(huì)十分關(guān)注的一個(gè)熱點(diǎn),其中國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)涵和外延、核心國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的界定、是否應(yīng)當(dāng)在多邊貿(mào)易談判中引入勞工條款等都產(chǎn)生了巨大爭議,而本文圍繞這些爭議以國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行為軸串聯(lián)起相關(guān)問題,分析國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行遇到巨大挑戰(zhàn)的原因,提出通過國際勞工組織與其他相關(guān)主體的多維合作方式解決國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的執(zhí)行問題。國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行問題本身也是國際勞工法實(shí)施的問題,正所謂“無案不成法,無法不成理”,案例研究為我們開辟一條直白和清晰的研究路徑和解決之道。 除結(jié)論外,論文的主體部分共分為五章。 第一章簡要論述了國際勞工保護(hù)的歷史發(fā)展和國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的理念。著重介紹了勞工關(guān)系與勞工權(quán)利保護(hù)的歷史,從歷史的角度列舉了資本主義早期的、有代表性的國別勞工法：英國勞工法、荷蘭勞工法、法國勞工法及美國勞工法。由此可見,勞工權(quán)利保護(hù)發(fā)端于西方國家的國內(nèi)社會(huì)治理,而今這種治理模式已經(jīng)全球化。國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(核心勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn))的確立和認(rèn)同是國際社會(huì)對(duì)保護(hù)勞工權(quán)利的一種有益實(shí)踐,是普世價(jià)值的重要體現(xiàn)。國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的概念、內(nèi)涵、外延的形成和發(fā)展正體現(xiàn)了這種普世價(jià)值觀和人類社會(huì)的基本需要。 第二章討論了國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行的維度,分別講述了國際勞工保護(hù)與人權(quán)法理論、國際勞工保護(hù)與國際秩序兩對(duì)范疇。首先,國際勞工保護(hù)本質(zhì)上是國際人權(quán)的要求,國際勞工法是國際人權(quán)法的重要分支,國際人權(quán)法的基本理論、基本原理適用于國際勞工法,簡言之國際人權(quán)法與國際勞工法存在上下級(jí)統(tǒng)屬關(guān)系。其次,國際勞工保護(hù)與國際秩序是相互保障、相互制約、相互促進(jìn)的一對(duì)范疇。國際勞工保護(hù)是國際秩序的基本要求,穩(wěn)定的國際秩序是國際勞工保護(hù)的基本條件。 第三章主要論述了國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行所面臨的環(huán)境和種種挑戰(zhàn),例如國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行機(jī)制受到廣泛質(zhì)疑、國際勞工組織會(huì)員國采納“基本勞工公約”數(shù)量和比率都不高、大多數(shù)基本勞工公約執(zhí)行還停留在會(huì)員國的自愿基礎(chǔ)上、執(zhí)行程序的有效性、透明度不夠。本章重點(diǎn)還討論了貿(mào)易協(xié)定與勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)掛鉤的可能性及其相互影響。發(fā)達(dá)國家通過多邊貿(mào)易框架內(nèi)對(duì)違反勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的發(fā)展中國家進(jìn)行制裁企圖沒有實(shí)現(xiàn),是因?yàn)檫@不符合國際社會(huì)的基本價(jià)值理念,也違反了主權(quán)國家平等協(xié)商原則,更主要的是該措施本質(zhì)上是“損人不利己的”。盡管在雙邊和區(qū)域?qū)用嫔锨度搿皠诠l款”有蔓延之勢(shì),但實(shí)質(zhì)上“勞工條款”沒有對(duì)貿(mào)易格局產(chǎn)生重大影響,貿(mào)易協(xié)定中的“勞工條款”對(duì)促進(jìn)勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行的國別計(jì)劃影響也十分有限。 第四章通過對(duì)涉及國際勞工組織的案例述評(píng)、貿(mào)易協(xié)定中案例述評(píng)及其他國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行方式的述評(píng),證明國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)實(shí)施途徑的多樣化,實(shí)施主體的多元化,實(shí)施內(nèi)容的擴(kuò)展化。同時(shí)印證本文主旨——多維合作方式的有效性和正當(dāng)性。從這一系列案例分析亦可得出：西方國家試圖通過貿(mào)易制裁來追求所謂的“勞工領(lǐng)域的公平正義”是行不通的,也沒有實(shí)踐支撐,而通過國際勞工組織的國別計(jì)劃、與當(dāng)?shù)卣献饔?jì)劃、能力培訓(xùn)項(xiàng)目、與企業(yè)合作項(xiàng)目等不僅可以改善勞工狀況,而且能有效提升當(dāng)?shù)卣蛑鞴懿块T的勞工保護(hù)水平。簡而言之,國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行的多維合作方式在理論上具有正當(dāng)性,在實(shí)踐上具有可行性。 第五章主要論述國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行的中國挑戰(zhàn)、中國實(shí)踐、中國經(jīng)驗(yàn),包含與國際合作和實(shí)施國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的挑戰(zhàn),本章還著重論述了國際勞工組織的“體面勞動(dòng)”中國國別計(jì)劃,及中國與他國(區(qū)域集團(tuán))涉勞糾紛中的實(shí)踐情況,最后簡要論述了可以借鑒的歐盟社會(huì)政策。四個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容力證中國在國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行領(lǐng)域所取得的進(jìn)步以及存在的不足,希望各級(jí)政府和社會(huì)伙伴更加積極參與國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行,通過多維合作方式提升中國執(zhí)行國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的能力。 結(jié)論部分總結(jié)全文,重申國際勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)執(zhí)行的多維合作路徑是各層級(jí)法律實(shí)踐和法律經(jīng)驗(yàn)的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The international labor standard is a hot topic of concern in the international community in the past decade. The connotation and extension of the international labor standards, the definition of the core international labor standards, the introduction of labor terms in the multilateral trade negotiations, and so on, have produced great disputes. This article is carried out around these disputes by international labor standards. The issue of the implementation of international labour standards through multidimensional cooperation between the International Labour Organization and other related subjects. The issue of the implementation of international labour standards is also a question of the implementation of international labour law. The case study has opened up a clear and clear research path and solution for us.
In addition to the conclusion, the main part of the thesis is divided into five chapters.
The first chapter briefly discusses the historical development of international labor protection and the concept of international labor standards. It focuses on the history of labor relations and labor rights protection. From a historical point of view, it enumerates the early and representative country labor law of Capitalism: the British Labour Law, the law of the Holland, the French labor law and the American labor law. It is clear that the protection of labor rights originates from the domestic social governance of the western countries, and now this mode of governance has been globalized. The establishment and identification of international labor standards (core labor standards) is a useful practice for the international community to protect labor rights and is an important embodiment of universal value. The formation and development of this world embodies the universal values and the basic needs of human society.
The second chapter discusses the dimensions of the implementation of international labor standards, including the international labor protection and human rights law theory, the two pairs of international labor protection and international order. First, the international labor protection is essentially the requirement of international human rights. International labor law is an important branch of international human rights law, the basic theory of international human rights law and the basic original. It is suitable for international labor law. In brief, international human rights law and international labor law have upper and lower subordinate relations. Secondly, international labor protection and international order are mutual protection, mutual restraint and mutual promotion. International labor protection is the basic requirement of international order and stable international order is the basic article of International labor protection. Pieces.
The third chapter mainly discusses the environment and challenges facing the implementation of international labour standards, for example, the implementation mechanism of international labour standards is widely questioned, the number and ratio of the ILO member states adopt the "basic Labour Convention", and the implementation of most of the basic labour conventions is still on the voluntary basis of the member states. The effectiveness and transparency of the procedure are not enough. This chapter also focuses on the possibility of the linkage of trade agreements with labour standards and their mutual influence. The failure of developed countries to impose sanctions on developing countries that violate labour standards in the framework of multilateral trade is because it does not conform to the basic values of the international community and is violated. The principle of equal consultation in sovereign states, more importantly, is essentially "loss of interest". Despite the spread of "labour clause" on the bilateral and regional levels, the essence of the "labour clause" does not have a significant impact on the trade pattern, and the "labour clause" in the trade agreement promotes the implementation of labour standards. The impact of the country's country plan is also very limited.
In the fourth chapter, a review of cases involving international labour organizations, a review of cases in trade agreements and the commentary of other international labor standards, proves that the implementation of international labor standards is diversified, the implementation of the main body is diversified, and the implementation of the content is expanded. It can also be concluded from this series of cases that western countries are not able to pursue the so-called "fair and justice in the field of labour" through trade sanctions, and there is no practical support. Through the International Labour Organization's country plan, the cooperation program with the local government, the capacity training program, and the enterprise cooperation project are not only available. In order to improve the labor situation and effectively improve the level of labor protection in the local government or the competent authorities. In short, the multi-dimensional cooperation method implemented by the international labor standards is justified in theory and practicable in practice.
The fifth chapter mainly discusses the challenges of the implementation of international labor standards, China's practice and China's experience, including the challenges of international cooperation and implementation of international labor standards. This chapter also focuses on the "decent work" of the International Labour Organization in China, and the practice in the disputes involving China and other countries (regional groups). It is necessary to discuss the social policies of the European Union that can be used for reference. The content of the four aspects is to testified to China's progress in the field of international labor standards implementation and its shortcomings. It is hoped that the government and social partners at all levels will participate more actively in the implementation of International Labour Standards and enhance the ability of China to implement international labour standards through multi-dimensional cooperation.
The conclusion summarizes the full text and reiterates the multidimensional cooperation path of international labor standards implementation, which is a summary of legal practice and legal experience at all levels.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D998.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 鄭祝君;公司與社會(huì)的和諧發(fā)展——美國公司制度的理念變遷[J];法商研究;2004年04期

2 程宗璋;WTO影響下的勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與國際貿(mào)易問題[J];工會(huì)論壇(山東省工會(huì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2003年01期

3 楊方方,鄭功成;中國失業(yè)保障體系現(xiàn)狀和未來挑戰(zhàn)[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期

4 余敏友;;中國參與WTO爭端解決活動(dòng)評(píng)述[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2009年05期

5 曾煒;;貿(mào)易與勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題:文獻(xiàn)述評(píng)[J];社科縱橫;2007年01期

6 鄂曉梅;;以勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為基礎(chǔ)的單邊貿(mào)易措施與WTO規(guī)則——貿(mào)易壁壘的新趨向及發(fā)展中國家的對(duì)策[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2010年02期

7 戴德生;WTO勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與中國勞動(dòng)立法的完善[J];政治與法律;2004年02期

8 常凱;WTO、勞工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與勞工權(quán)益保障[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年01期

9 鄭尚元;建立中國特色的罷工法律制度[J];戰(zhàn)略與管理;2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1962065