本文選題：WTO爭(zhēng)端解決 + DSU��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的運(yùn)行實(shí)踐充分展示了DSB有效解決成員方貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端的成就與特色。其中,由專家組實(shí)踐并由上訴機(jī)構(gòu)予以認(rèn)可的司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則就是DSB爭(zhēng)端解決的特色之一。司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則是DSB在總結(jié)以往GATT爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)上確立和逐步完善的。司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則源于國(guó)內(nèi)法,在一國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)司法審判實(shí)踐中,為了節(jié)約司法資源提高司法效率,審判方會(huì)對(duì)當(dāng)事方的某些訴求不予審理。WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的適用是指WTO專家組無需對(duì)爭(zhēng)端當(dāng)事方的每一訴求進(jìn)行裁決,而只需裁決爭(zhēng)端解決所必需處理的訴求。司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的適用不但有助于實(shí)現(xiàn)專家組和上訴機(jī)構(gòu)快速公正解決爭(zhēng)端的目標(biāo),而且還能有效避免對(duì)WTO協(xié)定規(guī)則模糊、空白之處作出超越其爭(zhēng)端解決權(quán)限的法律解釋或裁決。另一方面,司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的適用也會(huì)督促WTO成員方加快相關(guān)規(guī)則多邊談判和協(xié)商的進(jìn)程。與此同時(shí),WTO爭(zhēng)端解決對(duì)司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的適用的影響及其存在的問題也日益受到參訴方和國(guó)際法學(xué)術(shù)界的關(guān)注。 為對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的適用做一全面的介紹、評(píng)價(jià)和論述,本文分為五部分。第一部分為司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的概述。具體介紹司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的概念、國(guó)內(nèi)法淵源及其與相關(guān)概念的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別。第二部分詳細(xì)論述WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則適用的實(shí)踐。該部分首先對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決程序做一簡(jiǎn)要介紹,然后從專家組程序和上訴審理程序兩個(gè)層面對(duì)司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的確立和發(fā)展做一全面論述和探討。第三部分論述了司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則適用推動(dòng)爭(zhēng)端快速公正解決的積極影響,司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則適用存在的問題和解決思路。第四部分闡述了司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則適用實(shí)踐帶給我國(guó)的啟示。 分析探討WTO適用司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的實(shí)踐有助于提升我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)我涉訴案件適用司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則的能力,同時(shí)積累應(yīng)對(duì)司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則適用的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:The practice of WTO dispute settlement mechanism fully demonstrates the achievements and characteristics of DSB in resolving trade disputes among its members. One of the characteristics of DSB dispute settlement is the principle of judicial economy, which is practiced by the panel and recognized by the appellate body. The principle of judicial economy is established and gradually perfected by DSB on the basis of summing up the practice of GATT dispute settlement. The principle of judicial economy originates from domestic law. In order to save judicial resources and improve judicial efficiency, in the practice of judicial trial in a country, The application of the principle of judicial economy in dispute settlement means that the WTO panel does not need to rule on each claim of the parties to the dispute, but only needs to adjudicate the claims that must be dealt with in dispute settlement. The application of the principle of judicial economy can not only help to realize the goal of the panel and the appellate body to resolve disputes fairly and quickly, but also can effectively avoid the ambiguity of the rules of the WTO agreement and make legal interpretations or decisions that exceed their competence of dispute settlement. On the other hand, the application of judicial economic principles will urge WTO members to speed up the process of multilateral negotiation and negotiation of relevant rules. At the same time, the influence of WTO dispute settlement on the application of judicial and economic principles and its existing problems have been paid more and more attention by the litigants and the academic circles of international law. In order to introduce, evaluate and discuss the application of judicial economic principle in WTO dispute settlement, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the summary of the principle of judicial economy. This paper introduces the concept of judicial economic principle, the origin of domestic law and its relation and difference with related concepts. The second part discusses the practice of applying the principle of judicial economy in WTO dispute settlement. This part first makes a brief introduction to the WTO dispute settlement procedure, and then discusses the establishment and development of the judicial economic principle from the two aspects of panel procedure and appeal procedure. The third part discusses the positive impact of the application of judicial economic principles to promote the speedy and just settlement of disputes, the problems existing in the application of judicial economic principles and the solutions. The fourth part expounds the enlightenment brought to our country by the application practice of judicial economic principle. The analysis and discussion of the practice of applying the principles of judicial economy to WTO will help to enhance the ability of our country's dispute settlement bodies to apply the principles of judicial economy to cases involving our litigation, and at the same time to accumulate experience in the application of the principles of judicial economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱廣東;;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中的司法克制及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年01期

2 江必新;程琥;;論判例在WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中的適用[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

3 楊國(guó)華;WTO爭(zhēng)端解決中的司法節(jié)制原則[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年01期

4 張乃根;;論WTO爭(zhēng)端解決的國(guó)內(nèi)法審查[J];法學(xué)家;2008年03期

5 石靜霞,胡榮國(guó);試從GATS第6條與第16條的關(guān)系角度評(píng)“美國(guó)博彩案”[J];法學(xué);2005年08期

6 胡加祥;;中國(guó)參與WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的實(shí)證分析[J];法學(xué);2008年11期

7 韓立余;世界貿(mào)易組織規(guī)則的解釋[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問題;2000年03期

8 王友根;龔柏華;;中美出版物和音響產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入WTO爭(zhēng)端案述評(píng)[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2010年01期

9 趙艷敏;;從美國(guó)高地棉花補(bǔ)貼案看農(nóng)產(chǎn)品出口補(bǔ)貼的法律適用問題[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期

10 肖威;;WTO爭(zhēng)端勝訴方“申請(qǐng)授權(quán)報(bào)復(fù)”的程序問題研究——“世貿(mào)組織爭(zhēng)端解決規(guī)則與程序的諒解”第21.5條和第22.6條之間的順序問題[J];河北法學(xué);2008年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1936987