本文選題：國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓 + TRIPS��； 參考：《南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今世界正處于一個(gè)知識經(jīng)濟(jì)和全球化的時(shí)代�？茖W(xué)技術(shù)是第一生產(chǎn)力。先進(jìn)的技術(shù)是各國生存和發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略性資源,更是一國綜合國力和競爭力的體現(xiàn)。技術(shù)創(chuàng)新是各國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的源動(dòng)力。人類技術(shù)發(fā)展和創(chuàng)新的歷史進(jìn)程表明任何一國均不可能成為所有技術(shù)的領(lǐng)先者。發(fā)達(dá)國家中,以美、日、德、韓國等國為例,這些國家的發(fā)展歷程告訴我們：技術(shù)落后的國家通過獲取強(qiáng)國先進(jìn)技術(shù)的方式,自身不斷進(jìn)行消化、吸收、改進(jìn)、再創(chuàng)新,最終培養(yǎng)出自己的技術(shù)能力。本文主要從以下幾個(gè)方面著手進(jìn)行論述： 本文首先從國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的基本問題著手,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)有的研究成果,對國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的基本構(gòu)架進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的梳理。主要探討了國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的基本概念和發(fā)展概況、與國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)的國際層面立法以及現(xiàn)行我國有關(guān)國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律體系,評析當(dāng)代世界國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律框架。 TRIPS對國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的制度設(shè)計(jì)主要包括TRIPS的簽署背景、主要內(nèi)容及特點(diǎn)。本文在對TRIPS的立法宗旨、精神進(jìn)行評析的基礎(chǔ)上,系統(tǒng)地解析了TRIPS協(xié)議框架下對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制。 TRIPS協(xié)議實(shí)質(zhì)上美國等發(fā)達(dá)國家利益和意志的體現(xiàn)。其根本宗旨是為了阻止發(fā)展中國家走以前工業(yè)化國家的仿制道路,在全球推行統(tǒng)一的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),減少各國決定本國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平的自主權(quán)。TRIPS協(xié)議有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)范圍、內(nèi)容和保護(hù)期限的規(guī)定,都是以上目的體現(xiàn),有些條款甚至直接來自于美國的法律規(guī)定。在此背景下,美國的技術(shù)出口管制制度本質(zhì)上與TRIPS協(xié)議并無實(shí)質(zhì)沖突,管制措施的任何變遷只取決于一個(gè)目的,即美國的利益需要。 雖然我國已經(jīng)頒布了一系列的法律法規(guī)促進(jìn)和規(guī)范技術(shù)引進(jìn)國際貿(mào)易活動(dòng)。但是隨著我國社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的逐步建立和不斷完善,原先的法律法規(guī)已經(jīng)不再能適應(yīng)全球化的趨勢和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的形勢,也在一定程度上對我國技術(shù)引進(jìn)對外貿(mào)易活動(dòng)形成了某種制約。我國技術(shù)引進(jìn)中存在一些問題,如何完善我國技術(shù)引進(jìn)立法是本文寫作的最終目的。
[Abstract]:The world is in the era of knowledge economy and globalization. Science and technology are the primary productive forces. Advanced technology is a strategic resource for the survival and development of each country, and is also the embodiment of a country's comprehensive national strength and competitiveness. Technological innovation is the source of economic development in various countries. The history of human technological development and innovation shows that no country can be a leader in all technologies. Among the developed countries, take the United States, Japan, Germany, South Korea and other countries as examples. The development of these countries tells us that the technologically backward countries constantly digest, absorb, improve, and innovate through the way of acquiring the advanced technology of powerful countries. Finally develop their own technical ability. This article mainly starts from the following several aspects carries on the discussion: This paper begins with the basic problems of international technology transfer and combs the basic framework of international technology transfer with the existing research results at home and abroad. This paper mainly discusses the basic concept and development of international technology transfer, the international legislation related to international technology transfer and the current legal system of international technology transfer in China, and comments on the legal framework of international technology transfer in the contemporary world. The system design of international technology transfer by TRIPS mainly includes the background, main content and characteristics of TRIPS. Based on the analysis of the legislative purpose and spirit of TRIPS, this paper systematically analyzes the regulation of intellectual property abuse under the framework of TRIPS. In essence, the TRIPS agreement embodies the interests and will of the developed countries such as the United States. Its fundamental purpose is to prevent developing countries from following the path of the former industrialized countries and to promote uniform standards for the protection of intellectual property globally, The scope, content and duration of intellectual property rights in trips Agreement are all reflected in the above purpose. Some provisions even come directly from the laws of the United States. Under this background, the technology export control system of the United States does not conflict with the TRIPS agreement in essence, and any changes of the control measures only depend on one purpose, that is, the interests of the United States. Although China has promulgated a series of laws and regulations to promote and regulate the introduction of technology into international trade activities. However, with the gradual establishment and continuous improvement of the socialist market economic system in China, the original laws and regulations are no longer able to adapt to the trend of globalization and the situation of economic development. To some extent, it also restricts the foreign trade activities of China's technology import. There are some problems in technology introduction in China. How to perfect the legislation of technology introduction in China is the ultimate purpose of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D996.5;D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 辛柏春;;TRIPS協(xié)定與國際貿(mào)易中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘[J];北方法學(xué);2009年01期

2 張昌彩;我國技術(shù)引進(jìn)的問題與對策[J];中國創(chuàng)業(yè)投資與高科技;2004年02期

3 劉瑋;羅瀾;;引進(jìn)技術(shù)的法制研究——解讀《國家中長期科學(xué)和技術(shù)發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2006-2020年)》[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2007年08期

4 喻坤鵬;邱丹陽;;奧巴馬執(zhí)政后的中美貿(mào)易摩擦評析[J];東南亞縱橫;2010年02期

5 韓赤風(fēng);對DVD事件中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律思考[J];法商研究;2005年03期

6 王先林;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

7 王藝;;TRIPS與我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年03期

8 黃軍英;;美國對華技術(shù)出口管制政策走向分析[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2009年06期

9 李安方;美國對華技術(shù)出口管制的效果評判與前景分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2004年07期

10 余萬里;美國對華技術(shù)出口:管制及其限制[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)評論;2000年Z4期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬忠法;論經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化下的國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓法律協(xié)調(diào)制度[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張建軍;中美技術(shù)出口管理法律制度的比較研究[D];西北大學(xué);2004年

2 徐彬;國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓在中國的立法與實(shí)務(wù)研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

3 李春銀;國際技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓的政府管理問題研究[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2008年

4 殷杏玲;美國技術(shù)出口管制制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1909715