本文選題：傳統(tǒng)文化的國際保護 + 知識產權立法　； 參考：《哈爾濱工程大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)文化是人類文化重要的組成部分，體現(xiàn)了一個民族乃至一個國家獨特的文化特征。然而在國際范圍內，尚未建立傳統(tǒng)文化的知識產權保護機制，傳統(tǒng)文化知識產權保護意識的薄弱，以及法律機制的缺失，導致一國的文化遺產遭到其他國家的不適當利用與濫用。 基于此，，本文在梳理立法問題的同時，提出了傳統(tǒng)文化知識產權的利益平衡機制以及國內立法與國際立法問題。發(fā)達國家與發(fā)展中國家，傳統(tǒng)文化的來源地與其他地區(qū)，傳統(tǒng)文化傳承人與改編者、使用者的利益失衡問題亟待解決，傳統(tǒng)文化的來源地以及傳統(tǒng)文化創(chuàng)作傳承人應積極謀求利益平衡機制，以維護傳統(tǒng)文化來源地與傳承人的精神利益與經濟利益。同時，在立法時應注意國內法與國際法的銜接，如何平衡傳統(tǒng)文化知識產權的國際保護與國內保護之間的關系，也是制定傳統(tǒng)文化法律保護機制的重點之一。這也是建立良好的傳統(tǒng)文化國際保護制度的前提。 對于傳統(tǒng)文化知識產權國際保護的立法重構，本文確定了與傳統(tǒng)文化知識產權相關的基本概念，并建議在立法保護方面，應實行私權與公權相結合的立法機制，一方面在知識產權領域內對傳統(tǒng)文化進行保護，另一方面對傳統(tǒng)文化的文化權利進行保護。本文提出了運用國際條約中的彈性條款對傳統(tǒng)文化進行保護，以TRIPs為例。由于TRIPs協(xié)議中并未加入對于傳統(tǒng)文化的知識產權保護，因此只有從彈性條款中找到與之相聯(lián)系的條款并加以運用。以我國為代表的發(fā)展中國家應當靈活運用TRIPs協(xié)議中的彈性條款來完善傳統(tǒng)文化知識產權的立法機制，以維護本國利益。一方面，應該充分理解把握TRIPs協(xié)議中的彈性條款，另一方面應積極參與TRIPs協(xié)議多邊談判。
[Abstract]:Traditional culture is an important part of human culture, which embodies the unique cultural characteristics of a nation or even a country. However, in the international scope, the intellectual property protection mechanism of traditional culture has not been established, the consciousness of intellectual property protection of traditional culture is weak, and the lack of legal mechanism. As a result, the cultural heritage of one country is improperly exploited and abused by other countries. Based on this, this paper puts forward the interests balance mechanism of traditional cultural intellectual property rights and domestic and international legislation while combing the legislative issues. The interests of developed and developing countries, the origin and other regions of traditional culture, the imbalanced interests of traditional cultural inheritors and editors and users should be solved urgently. The origin of traditional culture and the inheritor of traditional culture creation should actively seek the mechanism of balancing interests in order to maintain the origin of traditional culture and the spiritual and economic interests of inheritors. At the same time, attention should be paid to the connection between domestic law and international law, and how to balance the relationship between the international and domestic protection of intellectual property rights of traditional culture is one of the key points in formulating the legal protection mechanism of traditional culture. This is also the premise of establishing a good international protection system of traditional culture. For the legislative reconstruction of the international protection of traditional cultural intellectual property rights, this paper defines the basic concepts related to the intellectual property rights of traditional culture, and suggests that the legislative mechanism of combining private and public rights should be implemented in the aspect of legislative protection. On the one hand, protect the traditional culture in the field of intellectual property, on the other hand, protect the cultural rights of the traditional culture. In this paper, the flexible clause in international treaties is proposed to protect traditional culture, taking TRIPs as an example. Because the intellectual property protection of traditional culture has not been added to the TRIPs agreement, it is necessary to find and apply the related clauses from the flexible clause. The developing countries represented by China should flexibly use the flexible clauses in the TRIPs Agreement to perfect the legislative mechanism of traditional cultural intellectual property rights in order to safeguard their own interests. On the one hand, we should fully understand and grasp the flexible clauses in the TRIPs agreement, on the other hand, we should actively participate in the multilateral negotiation of the TRIPs protocol.
【學位授予單位】：哈爾濱工程大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D997.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃玉燁;戈光應;;非物質文化遺產的法律保護模式[J];重慶工學院學報(社會科學版);2009年05期

2 肖婷;劉華鋒;;透過TRIPS協(xié)議看傳統(tǒng)知識的國際保護[J];產業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年03期

3 鄭璇玉;;創(chuàng)新與知識產權保護——以小傳統(tǒng)知識為視角[J];電子知識產權;2005年12期

4 王太平;;我國傳統(tǒng)知識保護立法的行動策略[J];電子知識產權;2007年11期

5 曲鴻亮,管寧;傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代——日本的文化產業(yè)和傳統(tǒng)文化保護[J];福建論壇(經濟社會版);2003年08期

6 黃玉燁;知識產權利益衡量論——兼論后TRIPs時代知識產權國際保護的新發(fā)展[J];法商研究;2004年05期

7 黃玉燁;;保護傳統(tǒng)文化的政策目標論綱[J];法商研究;2008年01期

8 曹新明;;非物質文化遺產保護模式研究[J];法商研究;2009年02期

9 程慧釗;民間文學藝術若干法律問題研究[J];法學雜志;2004年05期

10 嚴永和;;現(xiàn)行專利法對我國少數(shù)民族傳統(tǒng)知識的保護——論我國少數(shù)民族傳統(tǒng)知識的在先技術化[J];貴州民族研究;2006年06期

本文編號：1890456