國(guó)際投資仲裁正當(dāng)性危機(jī)之仲裁員獨(dú)立性研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-12 15:42
本文選題:正當(dāng)性危機(jī) + 仲裁員; 參考:《河北法學(xué)》2011年09期
【摘要】:發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家與發(fā)展中國(guó)家在相互協(xié)商的基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建了現(xiàn)代國(guó)際投資仲裁體制,克服了外交保護(hù)和當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?jì)的不足。但是,晚近國(guó)際投資仲裁程序出現(xiàn)了正當(dāng)性危機(jī)。其中仲裁員缺乏獨(dú)立性尤為突出。因?yàn)橹俨脝T是國(guó)際投資爭(zhēng)端的裁決者,是案件公正處理的保證,是整個(gè)國(guó)際投資仲裁程序順利進(jìn)行的核心因素。因此,應(yīng)該構(gòu)建常設(shè)性國(guó)際投資仲裁機(jī)構(gòu),避免仲裁員與案件的利益沖突,同時(shí)應(yīng)該完善《ICSID公約》的規(guī)定,詳盡界定仲裁員缺乏獨(dú)立性的情形,以確保仲裁員獨(dú)立性的實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:On the basis of mutual negotiation, developed and developing countries have constructed a modern international investment arbitration system, which overcomes the shortcomings of diplomatic protection and local relief. However, the recent international investment arbitration process appeared legitimacy crisis. The arbitrator's lack of independence is particularly prominent. Because the arbitrator is the adjudicator of the international investment dispute, it is the guarantee of the fair handling of the case and the core factor of the whole international investment arbitration procedure. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a permanent international investment arbitration institution to avoid conflicts of interest between arbitrators and cases, at the same time, to perfect the provisions of the ICSID Convention and to define in detail the lack of independence of arbitrators in order to ensure the realization of arbitrators' independence.
【作者單位】: 浙江工商大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目“國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法律規(guī)范的可移植性與國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全的相關(guān)性研究”(2007JJD810160) 浙江工商大學(xué)引進(jìn)人才科研啟動(dòng)項(xiàng)目(1100XJX200918)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】:D996.4;D997.4
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張圣翠;張心泉;;我國(guó)仲裁員獨(dú)立性和公正性及其保障制度的完善[J];法學(xué);2009年07期
2 陳福勇;;仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的獨(dú)立、勝任和公正如何可能——對(duì)S仲裁委的個(gè)案考察[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2009年02期
3 段sゾ,
本文編號(hào):1879181
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1879181.html
最近更新
教材專著