本文選題：非違法之訴 + 存在問題�。� 參考：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨著國際貿(mào)易的實踐活動在國與國之間的展開，為了有效地保護(hù)各成員方利益的平衡，防止WTO成員方違反在貿(mào)易談判中已達(dá)成的承諾，國際貿(mào)易的起草者設(shè)計出非違法之訴制度來維護(hù)成員方之間的貿(mào)易平衡。隨著其擔(dān)負(fù)的責(zé)任越來越重，WTO非違法之訴暴露的缺陷也越來越多。在規(guī)則方面，專家組對于“合理預(yù)期的利益”始終無法形成統(tǒng)一的解釋，使得在非違法之訴中裁定“某一非違法措施是否造成了利益的喪失或損害”具有不同的評判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在管轄范圍方面，，只要申訴方認(rèn)為其利益受損就適用非違法之訴，使得非違法之訴案件的管轄權(quán)不斷擴大，存在被濫用的風(fēng)險。在實際可操作性方面，其對因果關(guān)系的舉證顯得較為復(fù)雜而困難，這增加了非違法之訴可操作性的難度。在國際貿(mào)易市場不斷的發(fā)展下，中國面臨著以美國為代表的西方列強試圖通過非違法之訴來解決人民幣匯率爭端的問題，從WTO非違法之訴申訴方的主體、行為內(nèi)容和舉證責(zé)任角度，在非違法之訴內(nèi)解決我國人民幣匯率問題是不合法的，構(gòu)建我國應(yīng)對非違法之訴機制的體系顯得十分有必要。
[Abstract]:With the practice of international trade between countries and countries, in order to effectively protect the balance of members of Fang Liyi and prevent WTO members from violating the commitments that have been reached in the trade negotiations, the drafters of international trade have designed a non illegal litigation system to maintain the trade balance between the members of Fang Zhi. In terms of rules, the expert group has always been unable to form a unified interpretation of "reasonably expected interests", making it possible to adjudication that "a non illegal measure has caused loss or damage to the interests of a non illegal measure" in a non illegal lawsuit. In the scope of the jurisdiction, the WTO has a different standard of judgment. As long as the complainant thinks that its interests are damaged, the non illegal action will be applied, which makes the jurisdiction of non illegal cases constantly expanding and the risk of being abused. In practical operability, the proof of the causal relation is more complicated and difficult, which increases the difficulty of the non illegal action. Under the development of China, the Western powers, represented by the United States, try to solve the issue of the RMB exchange rate dispute through non illegal action. From the perspective of the non illegal WTO complainant's main body, the behavior content and the burden of proof, it is illegal to solve the problem of the RMB exchange rate in the non illegal lawsuit. The system of the litigation mechanism is very necessary.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 左曉東;;WTO非違反之訴與競爭政策[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2009年05期

2 謝崢;世貿(mào)組織中的“不違法之訴”[J];國際商務(wù).對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年02期

3 龔宇;“不違法之訴”與WTO爭端解決機制[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年01期

4 楊國華;WTO第一個非違反之訴——日本消費膠卷和相紙案[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年05期

5 王海峰;;WTO非違約之訴制度研究——兼論我國對非違約之訴機制的利用[J];國際貿(mào)易;2006年08期

6 易波;;WTO“利益”問題探析:非違法之訴視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年12期

7 鄧露;;淺議GATT/WTO體制下的“非違約之訴”[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年05期

8 楊衛(wèi)東;論WTO違法之訴中“抵消與損傷”推定的不可反證性[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

9 袁勇;;合法預(yù)期利益之訴初論——以WTO非違法之訴為鑒[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2006年02期

10 孫連鐘;劉秋東;;WTO爭端解決機制中非違反之訴適用要件的分析[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2007年25期

本文編號：1873618