本文選題：《反假冒貿易協(xié)議》(ACTA) + 知識產(chǎn)權　； 參考：《西南政法大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權海關保護制度是指各國以海關為主的行政機關,在進出口環(huán)節(jié)對含有知識產(chǎn)權侵權的商品采取扣押、中止放行的措施,及時阻止侵權商品進入一國流通的法律制度,被稱為是知識產(chǎn)權保護的“最有效的行政救濟方法”。 本文旨在對2010年12月3日公布的《反假冒貿易協(xié)議》(ACTA)進行分析,探討該協(xié)議中所規(guī)定的海關保護制度與TRIPs協(xié)議所規(guī)定的海關保護制度之間的差異,并進而對該協(xié)議與我國現(xiàn)行海關保護制度進行比較,試圖在此基礎上,預測該協(xié)議構建的海關保護制度對我國企業(yè)和產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響,從而尋找有效的應對之策。 全文兩萬余字,共分為五個部分。 第一部分為概述,首先界定了知識產(chǎn)權海關保護制度的相關概念,論述了該制度對知識產(chǎn)權保護的重要作用,并從海關保護制度的公益性質出發(fā),闡明了知識產(chǎn)權的保護要注意適度保護的問題,還對ACTA的制定背景進行了簡單介紹。 第二部分,探討了ACTA中海關保護制度與TRIPs相關規(guī)定的差異。一是海關保護客體范圍不同,表現(xiàn)在：要求適用的知識產(chǎn)權種類有所增多、適用的侵權行為種類有所擴大、適用的海關環(huán)節(jié)有所擴大、能夠享受措施豁免的物品范圍有所縮��；二是賦予海關當局的權限有所擴大,表現(xiàn)在：賦予海關當局自行采取行動的權力、海關向當事人披露信息的權限有所擴大；三是海關保護程序更加便捷高效,表現(xiàn)在：更完善的權利申請程序、更放松的擔�；虮ＷC形式、更高效的權利救濟方式；四是對被申請人權利的限制有所增多;此外,還分析了關于海關保護中的平行進口問題。 第三部分,將ACTA中知識產(chǎn)權海關保護制度與我國相關規(guī)定進行了比較分析,特別是在關于出口貨物的適用、關于過境中貨物的適用、關于小件貨物和個人行李的適用、以及對提交反擔保放行的態(tài)度等方面,二者存在一定的差異。 第四部分,論述了ACTA中知識產(chǎn)權海關保護制度的影響,正面影響主要表現(xiàn)在它提高了知識產(chǎn)權的海關保護水平,負面影響主要表現(xiàn)在大大增加了貿易成本,導致新的國際貿易壁壘的產(chǎn)生。 第五部分,提出了我國應對ACTA知識產(chǎn)權海關保護制度的對策建議。ACTA必將對我國企業(yè)帶來一定的負面影響,我國可以采取適當措施以規(guī)避過境貨物的風險、有效處理侵權貨物,以迎接ACTA帶來的新挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:The system of customs protection of intellectual property rights refers to the legal system in which the customs administrations of various countries take measures to seize and suspend the release of goods containing intellectual property rights infringement in the import and export links, and to prevent the infringing commodities from entering the circulation of a country in a timely manner. It is called "the most effective administrative remedy" for the protection of intellectual property rights. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTAA) published on December 3, 2010, and to explore the differences between the customs protection system stipulated in the Agreement and the Customs Protection system stipulated in the TRIPs Agreement. On the basis of the comparison between the agreement and the current customs protection system of our country, this paper attempts to predict the influence of the customs protection system constructed by the agreement on the enterprises and industries of our country, so as to find effective countermeasures. Full text more than 20,000 words, a total of five parts. The first part is an overview, first defines the relevant concepts of the system of customs protection of intellectual property rights, discusses the important role of the system in the protection of intellectual property rights, and starts from the commonweal nature of the system of customs protection. This paper clarifies that the protection of intellectual property should pay attention to the problem of moderate protection, and briefly introduces the background of the formulation of ACTA. The second part discusses the differences between the customs protection system of ACTA and the relevant regulations of TRIPs. First, the scope of the object of customs protection is different, which is manifested in: the types of intellectual property rights required to be applied have increased, the types of applicable infringement acts have been expanded, the applicable customs links have been expanded, and the scope of articles that can enjoy the exemption of measures has been narrowed; Second, the powers given to the customs authorities have been expanded, as shown by: giving the customs authorities the power to take action on their own and the authority of the customs to disclose information to the parties; and third, the customs protection procedures are more convenient and efficient. They are: more perfect procedure of application, more relaxed form of guarantee or guarantee, more efficient way of right relief; fourth, more restrictions on the rights of the respondent; in addition, the problem of parallel import in customs protection is also analyzed. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the customs protection system of intellectual property rights in ACTA and the relevant provisions of our country, especially on the application of export goods, goods in transit, small goods and personal luggage. There are some differences between them in the attitude of submitting anti-guarantee release. In the fourth part, the author discusses the influence of the intellectual property protection system in ACTA. The positive influence is mainly reflected in the improvement of the level of customs protection of intellectual property rights, and the negative effect is mainly reflected in the increase of trade costs. Lead to the emergence of new international trade barriers. In the fifth part, the author puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to the customs protection system of ACTA intellectual property rights. ACTA will inevitably bring some negative effects to Chinese enterprises. China can take appropriate measures to avoid the risk of goods in transit and deal with the infringing goods effectively. To meet the new challenges brought by ACTA.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 衣淑玲;;《反假冒貿易協(xié)定》談判述評[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2010年07期

2 崔國斌;;《反假冒貿易協(xié)議》與中國知識產(chǎn)權法的比較研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2011年08期

3 楊鴻;;《反假冒貿易協(xié)定》的知識產(chǎn)權執(zhí)法規(guī)則研究[J];法商研究;2011年06期

4 符正;;《反假冒貿易協(xié)定》的主要特點及中國的應對之策[J];中華商標;2012年02期

5 朱秋沅;;《反假冒貿易協(xié)定》[J];上海海關學院學報;2011年01期

6 陳福利;;《反假冒貿易協(xié)定》述評[J];知識產(chǎn)權;2010年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 湯濤;知識產(chǎn)權海關保護制度研究[D];華東政法大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1850679