本文選題：國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決 + 承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行　； 參考：《南昌大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)的仲裁事業(yè)發(fā)展至今已有六十年,加入《紐約公約》也有二十多年。在這個(gè)發(fā)展歷程中,在中國(guó)法院得到承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決案件數(shù)量可觀,中國(guó)也一直在發(fā)展中積累經(jīng)驗(yàn),發(fā)現(xiàn)問(wèn)題,完善法制。本文從仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的基礎(chǔ)理論出發(fā),立足于我國(guó)立法和司法的現(xiàn)狀,認(rèn)真分析了中國(guó)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的實(shí)踐,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的一些問(wèn)題并提出了自己的見(jiàn)解。 本文分為三個(gè)部分,第一部分著眼于國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行制度的基礎(chǔ)理論,以《紐約公約》為重點(diǎn),對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的概念、特點(diǎn)、承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的相互關(guān)系進(jìn)行了介紹；第二部分主要介紹國(guó)際社會(huì)關(guān)于承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的立法、承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行仲裁裁決的具體制度以及《紐約公約》拒絕承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的理由。第三部分立足于我國(guó)的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀,比照第二部分的國(guó)際立法,介紹了我國(guó)承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的法律淵源、具體制度,結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中的案例,分析我國(guó)拒絕承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的理由,提出關(guān)于執(zhí)行效率、對(duì)“社會(huì)公共利益”的理解、仲裁協(xié)議效力的認(rèn)定方面的思考。
[Abstract]:China's arbitration has been developed for 60 years, and it has been more than 20 years since China joined the New York Convention. In the course of this development, a considerable number of cases of international commercial arbitration awards have been recognized and enforced in Chinese courts. China has also accumulated experience in its development, found problems and improved the legal system. Based on the basic theory of recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards, and based on the current situation of legislation and judicature in China, this paper analyzes the practice of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards in China. Discover some of these problems and offer your own insights. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part focuses on the basic theory of recognition and enforcement system of international commercial arbitration awards, focusing on the New York Convention, the concept and characteristics of international commercial arbitration awards. The second part mainly introduces the legislation of the international community on the recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards. The specific system of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards and the reasons for the refusal of the New York Convention to recognize and enforce international commercial arbitral awards. The third part is based on the current situation of our country's legislation and judicature, comparing with the international legislation of the second part, it introduces the legal source, the concrete system and the cases in the judicial practice of recognizing and enforcing the international commercial arbitration award in our country. This paper analyzes the reasons for our country's refusal to recognize and enforce international commercial arbitration awards, and puts forward some thoughts on the efficiency of enforcement, the understanding of "social and public interests", and the determination of the validity of arbitration agreements.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.4;D925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 湯慶發(fā) ,翁曉健;論公共秩序?qū)彶楹椭袊?guó)仲裁的司法監(jiān)督[J];中國(guó)司法;2003年09期

2 萬(wàn)鄂湘;;《紐約公約》在中國(guó)的司法實(shí)踐[J];法律適用;2009年03期

3 楊瑯瑯;;國(guó)際商事仲裁裁決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行中不方便法院原則的運(yùn)用[J];法商論叢;2007年01期

4 趙秀文;;從�？斯景缚捶ㄔ簩�(duì)我國(guó)涉外仲裁裁決的監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)家;2005年02期

5 趙秀文;;從永寧公司案看公共政策作為我國(guó)法院拒絕執(zhí)行外國(guó)仲裁裁決的理由[J];法學(xué)家;2009年04期

6 趙秀文;;論非內(nèi)國(guó)仲裁項(xiàng)下的浮動(dòng)裁決與《紐約公約》項(xiàng)下的非本國(guó)裁決——兼論旭普林公司案項(xiàng)下ICC裁決的性質(zhì)[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2009年01期

7 楊逢柱;;境外仲裁裁決在中國(guó)的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行問(wèn)題:實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2009年01期

8 歐陽(yáng)振遠(yuǎn);;中國(guó)司法對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁的支持和監(jiān)督——兼評(píng)濟(jì)南市中級(jí)人民法院不予承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行ICC第13464/MS/JB/JEM號(hào)仲裁裁決案[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2009年01期

9 夏芳;關(guān)于涉外仲裁裁決的執(zhí)行[J];國(guó)際市場(chǎng);2001年05期

10 趙秀文;;從旭普林公司案看我國(guó)法院對(duì)國(guó)際商事仲裁的監(jiān)督[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2007年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1776586