本文選題：反傾銷 + “歸零法”��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：“歸零法”是近年來(lái)反傾銷實(shí)務(wù)中備受爭(zhēng)議的一個(gè)問(wèn)題,它經(jīng)常被以美國(guó)為代表的一些國(guó)家應(yīng)用于反傾銷調(diào)查實(shí)踐中,雖然“歸零法”引起了很多WTO成員方的不滿,并屢次在WTO專家組和上訴機(jī)構(gòu)報(bào)告中被認(rèn)定為違法,但由于美國(guó)等反傾銷大國(guó)的強(qiáng)硬立場(chǎng),完全廢止“歸零法”的前路相當(dāng)渺茫。我國(guó)是現(xiàn)今世界上被采取反傾銷措施最多的國(guó)家,對(duì)本問(wèn)題的深入研究,會(huì)使我國(guó)在面對(duì)反傾銷調(diào)查中的歸零計(jì)算法時(shí),有更好的應(yīng)對(duì)之策。 國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界關(guān)于“歸零法”問(wèn)題似乎未有足夠重視。雖然大部分關(guān)于反傾銷方面的書(shū)籍都對(duì)“歸零法”問(wèn)題有所涉及,但相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)往往只是結(jié)合具體案例對(duì)“歸零法”做了簡(jiǎn)要的介紹和評(píng)論,而并未對(duì)整個(gè)歸零問(wèn)題進(jìn)行全面的研究探討。本文試圖通過(guò)對(duì)各種歸零計(jì)算方法做一個(gè)比較全面的介紹,并通過(guò)對(duì)WTO框架下“歸零法”的違法性進(jìn)行深入分析和對(duì)多哈回合談判關(guān)于“歸零法”問(wèn)題發(fā)展的探討,為中國(guó)在應(yīng)對(duì)“歸零法”問(wèn)題時(shí),提出建議。本論文將分四個(gè)部分論述,具體結(jié)構(gòu)如下: 第一部分是關(guān)于反傾銷實(shí)踐中歸零法運(yùn)用的基本法律問(wèn)題。本部分首先對(duì)傾銷認(rèn)定過(guò)程的基本概念做了簡(jiǎn)要介紹,隨后介紹了傾銷幅度的計(jì)算方法,并說(shuō)明正常價(jià)值與出口價(jià)格比較的幾種方法,然后介紹了“歸零法”在反傾銷實(shí)踐中的分類,包括類型歸零法、簡(jiǎn)單歸零法和階段歸零法,并對(duì)他們?cè)谟?jì)算傾銷幅度中的應(yīng)用作了介紹。 第二部分是關(guān)于“歸零法”的違法性分析。本部分首先簡(jiǎn)要介紹了在GATT及WTO框架下“歸零法”問(wèn)題法律地位的演變,然后詳細(xì)分析了產(chǎn)生“歸零法”爭(zhēng)議的法律條款,包括《反傾銷協(xié)定》第2.4.2條和第17.6(ⅱ)條,隨后通過(guò)對(duì)GATT1994和《反傾銷協(xié)定》相關(guān)條款進(jìn)行的解讀,引出DSB對(duì)“歸零法”的違法性分析。 第三部分是關(guān)于多哈回合有關(guān)“歸零法”的發(fā)展及趨勢(shì)。本部分重點(diǎn)介紹了在多哈回合談判中各成員方對(duì)于“歸零法”問(wèn)題的態(tài)度,以及主席文本的妥協(xié),并說(shuō)明了多哈回合談判后“歸零法”問(wèn)題的可能發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。第四部分是關(guān)于中美“暖水蝦”歸零法爭(zhēng)端案及對(duì)中國(guó)的建議。本部分首先介紹了中美“暖水蝦”歸零法爭(zhēng)端案,然后對(duì)中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)“歸零法”問(wèn)題提出了建議,具體包括如下五個(gè)方面:堅(jiān)定立場(chǎng),聯(lián)合力量促成《反傾銷協(xié)定》的修改;在WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制下就針對(duì)中國(guó)的反傾銷歸零問(wèn)題積極提起告訴;積極促成WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的改革;成立針對(duì)貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端的研究和咨詢的專門(mén)機(jī)構(gòu);積極應(yīng)對(duì)有關(guān)的內(nèi)國(guó)訴訟。
[Abstract]:"Zero return" is a controversial issue in anti-dumping practice in recent years. It is often applied in anti-dumping investigation practice by some countries represented by the United States, although "zero return law" has aroused the dissatisfaction of many WTO members.It has been found to be illegal in the reports of WTO expert groups and appellate bodies, but due to the strong stance of the United States and other anti-dumping powers, the way forward to completely abolish the "Zero Law" is rather slim.China is the country with the most antidumping measures in the world. The thorough study of this problem will make our country have better countermeasures in the face of the zero calculation method in the anti-dumping investigation.The problem of returning to zero does not seem to be paid enough attention to in domestic academic circles.Although most of the books on antidumping have dealt with the issue of "zeroing", the relevant literature has often only briefly introduced and commented on the "zeroing method" in combination with specific cases.But did not carry on the overall research discussion to the whole return zero question.This paper attempts to make a comprehensive introduction to various methods of zeroing calculation, and through the in-depth analysis of the illegality of the Zero-Returning method under the framework of WTO and the discussion of the development of the "Zero-Returning method" in the Doha Round negotiation.This paper puts forward some suggestions for China to deal with the problem of "returning to zero".This paper will be divided into four parts, the specific structure is as follows:The first part is about the basic legal problems in the practice of anti-dumping.This part firstly introduces the basic concept of dumping identification process, then introduces the calculation method of dumping margin, and explains several methods of comparing normal value with export price.Then it introduces the classification of "return to zero" in the practice of anti-dumping, including the method of type zero, the simple method of returning to zero and the method of returning to zero by stages, and their application in calculating dumping margin is introduced.The second part is about the analysis of the illegality of the return to Zero method.This part first briefly introduces the evolution of the legal status of the "zeroing method" under the framework of GATT and WTO, and then analyzes in detail the legal provisions which give rise to the "zeroing law" dispute, including articles 2.4.2 and 17.6 (II) of the Anti-dumping Agreement.Then, through the interpretation of GATT1994 and the relevant articles of the Anti-dumping Agreement, the author draws the analysis of DSB's illegality of "Zero return Law".The third part is about the development and trend of the Doha Round.This part mainly introduces the attitude of members on the issue of "zero return" in the Doha Round negotiations, and the compromise of the President's text, and explains the possible development trend of the "return to zero law" issue after the Doha Round negotiation.The fourth part is about the Chinese-American "warm water shrimp" zero-to-France dispute and suggestions to China.This part first introduces the Sino-American "warm water shrimp" zero-law dispute case, and then puts forward some suggestions to China to deal with the "zero-law" issue, including the following five aspects: firm stand, United forces to promote the revision of the Anti-dumping Agreement;Under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, we should actively inform about the issue of zero anti-dumping against China; actively promote the reform of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism; set up a specialized agency for research and consultation on trade disputes; and actively deal with relevant domestic litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫霄燁;反傾銷中的歸零問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1735341