本文選題：涉外遺囑信托　切入點(diǎn)：法律沖突　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在各國(guó)之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)交流和人口流動(dòng)不斷加強(qiáng)的背景下,隨著我國(guó)遺囑信托產(chǎn)業(yè)的不斷發(fā)展,我國(guó)的涉外遺囑信托案件也將不斷出現(xiàn)。但是,我國(guó)2010年頒布施行的《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》中卻并未對(duì)涉外遺囑信托的法律適用規(guī)則作出明確的規(guī)定。這在實(shí)踐中會(huì)導(dǎo)致涉外遺囑信托法律適用的選擇困難,即涉外遺囑信托是應(yīng)依據(jù)涉外遺囑進(jìn)行法律選擇?還是依據(jù)涉外信托進(jìn)行法律選擇?抑或是依據(jù)分割法進(jìn)行法律選擇?有鑒于此,本文將在詳細(xì)分析涉外遺囑信托中存在的法律沖突及國(guó)外關(guān)于涉外遺囑信托法律適用的立法的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)涉外遺囑信托法律適用的立法完善提出相關(guān)建議。本文主要分為四個(gè)部分。第一部分對(duì)涉外遺囑信托歷史和概念進(jìn)行了闡述,包括對(duì)遺囑信托發(fā)展歷程及其功能的介紹,以及涉外遺囑信托的概念界定和它與一般涉外信托、涉外遺囑繼承的區(qū)別。第二部分分析了各國(guó)關(guān)于遺囑信托制度的規(guī)定中存在的法律沖突,主要表現(xiàn)在遺囑能力、遺囑形式、遺囑內(nèi)容、遺囑撤銷(xiāo)及信托有效性、信托當(dāng)事人權(quán)利義務(wù)、信托財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)屬、信托管理等方面。第三部分介紹了國(guó)外關(guān)于涉外遺囑信托法律適用的立法,包括以英國(guó)和美國(guó)為代表的英美法系國(guó)家、以德國(guó)和日本為代表的大陸法系國(guó)家以及海牙《關(guān)于信托的法律適用及其承認(rèn)的公約》關(guān)于涉外遺囑信托法律適用的規(guī)定。最后一部分介紹了我國(guó)《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》關(guān)于涉外信托關(guān)系和涉外遺囑繼承關(guān)系法律適用的規(guī)定,并分析了統(tǒng)一適用涉外信托關(guān)系的法律適用規(guī)則或者涉外遺囑繼承關(guān)系法律適用的規(guī)則,以及分割適用涉外信托關(guān)系和涉外遺囑繼承關(guān)系的法律適用規(guī)則來(lái)解決涉外遺囑信托法律沖突,可能產(chǎn)生的理論上和實(shí)踐中的問(wèn)題。在此基礎(chǔ)上,提出了我國(guó)涉外遺囑信托法律適用的立法建議。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of testamentary trust industry in our country, the cases of testamentary trust will appear continuously in our country under the background of strengthening economic exchange and population flow among different countries. However, there will be more and more cases of testamentary trust in our country. However, the law applicable to foreign testamentary trust has not been clearly stipulated in the Law on the Application of Foreign Law on Civil Relations in 2010, which will lead to difficulties in the choice of legal application of testamentary trust involving foreign affairs in practice. That is, foreign will trust should be based on foreign will for legal choice? Or the choice of law based on foreign trust? Or is it a choice of law based on the split method? In view of this, this paper will analyze in detail the conflicts of laws existing in foreign testamentary trusts and the foreign legislation on the application of foreign testamentary trust laws. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part expounds the history and concept of testamentary trust, including the development of testamentary trust and its function. And the definition of testamentary trust concerning foreign affairs and the difference between testamentary trust and testamentary succession. The second part analyzes the conflict of laws existing in the regulation of testamentary trust system in various countries, which is mainly manifested in testamentary capacity and testamentary form. The contents of the will, the revocation of the will and the validity of the trust, the rights and obligations of the parties to the trust, the ownership of the trust and the property rights of the trust, the management of the trust, etc. Including the Anglo-American legal system represented by the United Kingdom and the United States, The civil law countries represented by Germany and Japan, as well as the provisions of the Hague Convention on the Application of Trust Law and its recognition, on the legal Application of Foreign testamentary Trusts. The last part introduces the civil relations concerning foreign affairs in China. It is a provision of the applicable Law of Law on the Application of the Law concerning Trust Relations and testamentary succession Relations concerning Foreign Affairs, It also analyzes the applicable rules of the law applicable to the trust relationship concerning foreign affairs or the law applicable to the testamentary succession relationship involving foreign affairs. And the rules of law applicable to the relationship between foreign trust and foreign testamentary succession are divided to solve the legal conflict of foreign testamentary trust, which may cause problems in theory and practice. The legislative suggestions on the application of the law of testamentary trust concerning foreign affairs in China are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997;D923.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陸勇洲;;論涉外動(dòng)產(chǎn)物權(quán)的法律適用問(wèn)題——以我國(guó)“涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法”為視角[J];西南石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

2 李建忠;;論涉外遺囑法律適用制度的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)——兼論《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》第32、33條的解釋與完善[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2014年01期

3 孫善國(guó);;淺談遺囑信托與遺囑繼承、代理等法律行為的異同[J];學(xué)理論;2013年25期

4 李霞;;遺囑信托制度論[J];政法論叢;2013年02期

5 李雙元;;關(guān)于我國(guó)《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2012年03期

6 宋曉;;同一制與區(qū)別制的對(duì)立及解釋[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2011年06期

7 黃進(jìn);;中國(guó)涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法的制定與完善[J];政法論壇;2011年03期

8 張淳;;信托財(cái)產(chǎn)獨(dú)立性的法理[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年03期

9 宋渝玲;;國(guó)際信托的法律沖突與法律適用[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

10 徐崇利;;我國(guó)沖突法立法應(yīng)拓展意思自治原則的適用范圍[J];政治與法律;2007年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高璐;涉外遺囑繼承的法律適用問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 元靜;涉外信托關(guān)系之法律適用問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 熊汀;我國(guó)涉外繼承法律適用制度的完善[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 李昌化;論涉外遺囑繼承的法律適用[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2011年

4 馬琳;論國(guó)際信托的法律適用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

5 黎容秀;遺囑信托制度研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1684575