本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：知識(shí)產(chǎn)品　出處：《湖南社會(huì)科學(xué)》2016年05期

【摘要】：文章對(duì)"知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)"的內(nèi)在特質(zhì)進(jìn)行分析,全面地指出了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)自身存在的矛盾,即知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與公共利益的沖突,知識(shí)產(chǎn)品本身的非排他性與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷的排他性之間的矛盾,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)個(gè)人享受與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)責(zé)任社會(huì)承擔(dān)之間的矛盾,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)對(duì)知識(shí)發(fā)展兼具激勵(lì)性和抑制性的沖突,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利的享有的表象與資本控制和壟斷知識(shí)資源的本質(zhì)的矛盾,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利和義務(wù)的懸殊不對(duì)等的紕漏,知識(shí)的創(chuàng)造者與知識(shí)的利用者的分離的隱患,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中的國家權(quán)力與私人權(quán)利并行的本質(zhì),知識(shí)的主觀性與相對(duì)客觀性的矛盾以及無限性與相對(duì)有限性的矛盾,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)交易價(jià)格的隨意性和壟斷性的危害等。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)自身的這些隱性矛盾可能會(huì)造成對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)正當(dāng)性的質(zhì)疑或知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)及保護(hù)的再定位,文章并不對(duì)這些矛盾提供現(xiàn)實(shí)的解決方案,只是作出提醒,只有正確對(duì)待這些矛盾,才能更好地完善中國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the inherent characteristics of "intellectual property", and points out the contradiction of intellectual property itself, that is, the conflict between intellectual property and public interest. The contradiction between the non-exclusiveness of intellectual product itself and the monopoly of intellectual property, the contradiction between individual enjoyment of intellectual property and the social responsibility of intellectual property, and the conflict between intellectual property rights and knowledge development is both encouraging and restraining. The contradiction between the representation of intellectual property rights and capital control and monopoly of knowledge resources, the disparity between intellectual property rights and obligations, the hidden danger of separation between the creator of knowledge and the users of knowledge, The essence of state power and private right in intellectual property, the contradiction between subjectivity and relative objectivity of knowledge, and the contradiction between infinity and finiteness, The arbitrariness of intellectual property transaction price and the harm of monopoly, etc. These hidden contradictions of intellectual property rights themselves may lead to questioning the legitimacy of intellectual property rights or repositioning the nature and protection of intellectual property rights. The article does not provide a realistic solution to these contradictions. It is only a reminder that only by correctly treating these contradictions can China's intellectual property system be better perfected.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué);
【基金】：《后TRIPS時(shí)代“中國品格”知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)文化的重構(gòu)——立基于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本質(zhì)的法哲學(xué)透視》(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):13YJC820120),2013年教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)青年基金項(xiàng)目 《從國家立法到全民守法——中國后轉(zhuǎn)型期法治發(fā)展的轉(zhuǎn)向》(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):2015XQN01),2015年度上海政法學(xué)院青年科研基金項(xiàng)目(第五批)
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1679374