本文選題：綠色貿(mào)易壁壘　切入點：鞋業(yè)貿(mào)易　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和貿(mào)易自由化迅速發(fā)展,傳統(tǒng)的關(guān)稅和非關(guān)稅壁壘作用越來越弱。綠色貿(mào)易壁壘作為一種新型的非關(guān)稅壁壘,它的產(chǎn)生是全球貿(mào)易發(fā)展的必然結(jié)果,應(yīng)立足于全球貿(mào)易發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實以及未來貿(mào)易發(fā)展趨勢,對其予以分析。綠色貿(mào)易壁壘符合可持續(xù)發(fā)展理念,推動全球貿(mào)易良性發(fā)展。同時其也產(chǎn)生了不利影響,比如成為貿(mào)易保護(hù)工具,損害發(fā)展中國家利益。我國鞋業(yè)面臨嚴(yán)峻的綠色貿(mào)易壁壘,沖破發(fā)達(dá)國家日益嚴(yán)密的綠色貿(mào)易壁壘限制是亟需解決的問題。綠色貿(mào)易壁壘限制了鞋業(yè)出口數(shù)量,加大了鞋業(yè)出口成本,加劇了與其他國家之間的貿(mào)易摩擦。造成這些消極影響的原因是我國參與國際環(huán)境立法程度低,對WTO爭端解決機(jī)制利用不充分。而且國內(nèi)立法體系龐雜且多為原則性規(guī)定,執(zhí)法監(jiān)管部門之間缺乏協(xié)調(diào),綠色技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不全面而且要求低,預(yù)警機(jī)制也未建立。針對這些問題,我國應(yīng)分別從國際法和國內(nèi)法兩個角度予以有效應(yīng)對。國際法層面:積極參與國際環(huán)境立法;充分利用WTO爭端解決機(jī)制。國內(nèi)法層面:完善我國環(huán)境保護(hù)法律體系;完善鞋產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量安全技術(shù)法規(guī)和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)體系;建立我國鞋產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量安全監(jiān)管體系;建立有關(guān)鞋產(chǎn)品綠色貿(mào)易壁壘數(shù)據(jù)庫及預(yù)警機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization and trade liberalization, traditional tariff and non-tariff barriers are becoming weaker and weaker. As a new type of non-tariff barriers, green trade barriers are the inevitable result of global trade development. Green barriers to trade are consistent with the concept of sustainable development and promote the sound development of global trade. At the same time, they have a negative impact on the development of global trade, and should be based on the reality of the development of global trade and the trend of trade development in the future. For example, China's footwear industry faces severe green trade barriers as a tool of trade protection that harms the interests of developing countries. Breaking through the increasingly tight restrictions on green trade barriers in developed countries is a problem that needs to be addressed. Green barriers limit the number of shoes exports and increase the cost of shoes exports. These negative effects are due to our low level of participation in international environmental legislation and inadequate use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. There is a lack of coordination between law enforcement regulators, the green technology standards are incomplete and the requirements are low, and an early warning mechanism has not been established. Our country should deal with it effectively from two angles of international law and domestic law respectively. International law level: actively participate in international environmental legislation, make full use of WTO dispute settlement mechanism, domestic law level: perfect our country's environmental protection legal system; To perfect the technical regulation and standard system of quality and safety of shoe products; to establish the supervision system of quality and safety of shoe products in China; to establish the database and early warning mechanism of green trade barriers for shoes products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊俊樣;;綠色貿(mào)易壁壘對我國法律的影響及對策分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2017年03期

2 熊啟泉;鄧家瓊;;中國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品對外貿(mào)易失衡:結(jié)構(gòu)與態(tài)勢[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期

3 李喬僑;;綠色貿(mào)易壁壘對福建省鞋類產(chǎn)品出口的影響研究[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年12期

4 廖松;;綠色壁壘對我國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品出口貿(mào)易的影響及其對策分析[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(上半月刊);2010年13期

5 曲婷;;淺談綠色貿(mào)易壁壘對國際貿(mào)易的影響及我國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品出口應(yīng)對其的對策[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2010年05期

6 林娟;;綠色貿(mào)易壁壘的成因、對策分析[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2010年07期

7 武力超;;綠色貿(mào)易壁壘的國際比較及對我國的借鑒意義[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2010年01期

8 黃甜;高茜;;我國鞋業(yè)出口面臨的綠色壁壘及對策建議[J];黑龍江對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年10期

9 吳玲t(yī) ;;綠色貿(mào)易壁壘法律制度探析[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年04期

10 譚偉;蔡守秋;;環(huán)境法視角下的綠色壁壘[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2009年01期

，

本文編號：1643055