本文關(guān)鍵詞： 美國2012版BIT 環(huán)境保護條款 中美雙邊投資條約　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中國是世界上最大的發(fā)展中國家,同時,經(jīng)過30多年的改革開放,目前我國對外投資規(guī)模已經(jīng)躋身世界前十位,作為正在向資本輸出大國邁進的資本輸入大國,日益增長的經(jīng)濟實力使其在與美國的BIT談判中將擁有更多的契合點。在此期間,中美兩國沒有成功訂立BIT范本的原因是兩國的實際國情不同,立場和維護的利益有所差別。中國前期注重外資的數(shù)量,美國則要求高質(zhì)量的吸引外資。于是這樣,就中美這一次的BIT交涉中,應(yīng)該就環(huán)境保護條款等公共利益條目全力達成一致目標。就近期效應(yīng)而言,“公共利益規(guī)則諸如環(huán)境保護和勞工權(quán)益”的擴張意味著外資投資成本和風險的增加。但是從長期效應(yīng)來看,建立在破壞東道國環(huán)境等公共利益基礎(chǔ)上的高標準的投資保護勢必不能長久,不顧東道國經(jīng)濟社會的可持續(xù)發(fā)展的外資最終也會反噬其身�；诖�,美國最新版雙邊投資條約范本將環(huán)境保護條款的標準上升了一個檔次,實行更加嚴格的環(huán)境保護模式,無疑對中國等發(fā)展中國家的投資活動帶來許多影響。由于中國在投資活動中身份的逐步轉(zhuǎn)變,怎樣處理投資活動與可持續(xù)發(fā)展目標的關(guān)系,需要更深入的研究。環(huán)境保護條款的合理適用無論對于東道國、投資者還是世界經(jīng)濟健康發(fā)展都是有利的,我們應(yīng)該充分認識到環(huán)境保護條款的重要性�；诖�,筆者最開始分析了環(huán)境保護條款在BIT中所處的法律地位。明確環(huán)境保護條款的性質(zhì)(政策性取向)才能對其的法律作用有良好的認知,做到有的放矢。同時論述了環(huán)境保護條款的設(shè)計模式,從側(cè)面說明了在不同的設(shè)計模式下環(huán)境保護條款的法律效力。接下來,筆者對美國最新版BIT范本中的環(huán)境保護條款進行探索和評價。闡述了其產(chǎn)生的背景:經(jīng)濟全球化帶來的負面影響以及可持續(xù)發(fā)展原則的深刻影響,使人民對環(huán)境保護日益關(guān)注。通過新舊BIT范本的對比,明確了新范本對環(huán)境保護的強化,最終筆者也對美國BIT范本中加入環(huán)境保護條款的目的進行了論述。正如所有的事物都有兩面性,環(huán)境保護條款的納入給中國帶來積極影響的同時,也增加我國對外投資活動的風險�？偠灾�,2012版BIT范本是作為發(fā)達國家的美國在其自身利益的立場上擬定的投資法制。雖然有風險和挑戰(zhàn),但是我們面對環(huán)境保護條款的立場便是認識且接受它,并把它納入到中美BIT的談判中來。
[Abstract]:China is the largest developing country in the world. At the same time, after more than 30 years of reform and opening up, China's scale of overseas investment has already ranked among the top 10 in the world. Growing economic power will give it more common ground in the BIT negotiations with the United States. During this period, China and the United States did not succeed in establishing the BIT model because the actual conditions of the two countries are different. There are differences between the positions and the interests to be safeguarded. China paid attention to the quantity of foreign investment in the early stage, while the United States demanded high-quality foreign investment. So, in this case, in the BIT negotiations between China and the United States, Public interest items such as environmental protection clauses should be fully agreed. In terms of near-term effects, the expansion of "public interest rules such as environmental protection and labour rights" means an increase in the cost and risk of foreign investment. But in the long run, A high standard of investment protection based on undermining the environment of the host country and other public interests is bound to be unsustainable, and foreign investment that disregards the sustainable economic and social development of the host country will eventually erode itself. Based on this, The latest version of the US model bilateral investment treaty has raised the standard of the environmental protection clause to a more stringent environmental protection model. There is no doubt that there is a lot of impact on the investment activities of China and other developing countries. As China gradually changes its identity in investment activities, how to deal with the relationship between investment activities and the goal of sustainable development? The rational application of environmental protection provisions is beneficial to the healthy development of the host country, investors and the world economy, and we should fully recognize the importance of environmental protection provisions. The author begins to analyze the legal status of environmental protection clauses in BIT. Only by making clear the nature of environmental protection clauses (policy sexual orientation) can we have a good understanding of its legal role. At the same time, it discusses the design mode of environmental protection clauses, and explains the legal effect of environmental protection clauses in different design modes. The author explores and evaluates the environmental protection clauses in the latest version of the BIT model of the United States, and expounds its background: the negative impact of economic globalization and the profound impact of the principle of sustainable development. Make the people pay more and more attention to the environmental protection. Through the comparison of the new and the old BIT model, it is clear that the new model strengthens the environmental protection. Finally, the author also discusses the purpose of adding environmental protection clauses in the BIT model of the United States. Just as all things have two sides, the inclusion of environmental protection clauses has a positive impact on China at the same time. It also increases the risk of our country's outward investment activities. In a word, the 2012 BIT model is an investment legal system developed by the United States as a developed country in its own interests. Although there are risks and challenges, But our position in the face of the environmental protection clause is to recognize and accept it and incorporate it into the BIT negotiations between China and the United States.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡枚玲;;從美國BIT范本看國際投資與環(huán)境保護之協(xié)調(diào)[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

2 王艷冰;;美國新版BIT對環(huán)境保護的強化及中國對策[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(法治論叢);2015年04期

3 陳建孝;段鵬飛;;論美國2012年BIT范本中的環(huán)境保護條款[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;2014年16期

4 王艷冰;;美國BIT范本的環(huán)境政策考量與變遷及其對中國的啟示[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2014年06期

5 葛仲彰;;中國BIT實踐的最新發(fā)展:以“中加BIT”為例[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年07期

6 張光;;中外雙邊投資協(xié)定中公共利益保護條款之立法設(shè)計[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2014年03期

7 張娟;;美國雙邊投資框架協(xié)議(2012)研究[J];科學(xué)發(fā)展;2013年12期

8 胡曉紅;;論美國投資條約中的環(huán)境規(guī)則及其對我國的啟示[J];法商研究;2013年02期

9 崔凡;;美國2012年雙邊投資協(xié)定范本與中美雙邊投資協(xié)定談判[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2013年02期

10 劉正;;中國國際投資協(xié)定的環(huán)境條款評析與完善思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王艷冰;國際投資規(guī)則中的環(huán)境法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 梁嗣雯;美式投資協(xié)定的環(huán)保條款分析及對我國的啟示[D];北京交通大學(xué);2015年

2 李晨光;國際投資協(xié)定中環(huán)境保護條款研究[D];山東財經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

3 邱煜;雙邊投資協(xié)定（BIT）中環(huán)境保護法律問題的研究[D];南京財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 羅平;美國BIT范本（2012）“環(huán)境規(guī)則”及中國對策[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

5 董浩;國際投資中的環(huán)境保護法律問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1545290