本文關(guān)鍵詞：碳關(guān)稅對(duì)我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的影響及應(yīng)對(duì)策略研究　出處：《湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 碳關(guān)稅 出口貿(mào)易 環(huán)境保護(hù) 綠色壁壘

【摘要】：近年來(lái),極端高溫現(xiàn)象頻出并伴有各種災(zāi)害,冰雪融化、海平面抬升等氣候問(wèn)題日益威脅著人類的生存與發(fā)展。科學(xué)界一致認(rèn)為人類活動(dòng)產(chǎn)生的溫室氣體排放促成了氣候的變化,氣候問(wèn)題尤其是溫室氣體的排放問(wèn)題逐漸成為全球關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),而溫室氣體排放問(wèn)題中又尤以二氧化碳的排放備受關(guān)注。部分發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家因擔(dān)心碳泄漏以及本國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力因此受到損害,以發(fā)展中國(guó)家未承擔(dān)碳減排責(zé)任而導(dǎo)致發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力下降等為由推出碳關(guān)稅。碳關(guān)稅一經(jīng)推出,即在全球范圍內(nèi)受到廣泛熱議。大部分學(xué)者對(duì)碳關(guān)稅持反對(duì)意見,認(rèn)為碳關(guān)稅在法律層面上違反了WTO相關(guān)規(guī)則,是不合法的;在控制碳排放量等方面也未起到顯著作用,是發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家為保護(hù)本國(guó)貿(mào)易提出的綠色貿(mào)易壁壘。對(duì)碳關(guān)稅持支持態(tài)度的學(xué)者則認(rèn)為碳關(guān)稅有助于促使各國(guó)積極開展碳減排活動(dòng),有效抑制溫室氣體的排放,從而對(duì)環(huán)境惡化起到一定的減緩作用。本文將碳關(guān)稅與WTO基本原則、《關(guān)貿(mào)總協(xié)定》(GATT)第1條、第3條及第20條序言、(b)款以及(g)款進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)出碳關(guān)稅不一定違反WTO相關(guān)原則,相反,其在某些條件下還將符合WTO相關(guān)規(guī)則。碳關(guān)稅或可援用GATT第20條之環(huán)境一般例外條款來(lái)論證其合法性。同時(shí),本文還對(duì)我國(guó)的出口貿(mào)易現(xiàn)狀以及能源的消費(fèi)情況等方面展開分析,從而得出碳關(guān)稅可能對(duì)中國(guó)出口貿(mào)易造成惡化出口環(huán)境、增加工業(yè)制造業(yè)產(chǎn)品出口的成本、引起出口額不同程度下降、促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級(jí)、促進(jìn)低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展等方面的影響。并針對(duì)這些影響,從國(guó)際以及國(guó)內(nèi)兩個(gè)層面上提出我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)碳關(guān)稅措施所能采取的對(duì)策,以期對(duì)我國(guó)從容應(yīng)對(duì)碳關(guān)稅有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the phenomenon of extreme high temperature and accompanied by frequent disasters, ice melt, sea level and climate is threatening the human survival and development. The scientific consensus that human produced greenhouse gas emissions contributed to climate change, climate issues especially the issue of greenhouse gas emissions has become the focus of global concern, and the problem of greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide emissions have attracted much attention. In some developed countries for fear of carbon leakage and undermining the competitiveness of domestic industries in developing countries, did not undertake the carbon emission reduction responsibility and the developed countries led to the decline in the competitiveness of products by introduction of carbon tariffs. Carbon tariffs once launched, in the world widely hot debate. Most scholars disagree on the carbon tariff, that carbon tariffs violated WTO rules in the legal level, is not legitimate In the control of carbon emissions; and did not play a significant role in developed countries to protect domestic trade of green trade barriers to support carbon tariffs. Scholars believe that carbon tariff will help promote countries actively carry out carbon emission reduction activities, effectively restrain the emission of greenhouse gas and thus to a certain slow down the deterioration of the environment. The carbon tariff and the basic principle of WTO, < GATT > (GATT) first, third and 20 of the preamble, paragraph (b) and (g) models were analyzed, summed up the carbon tariff is not necessarily a violation of WTO related principles, on the contrary, in some conditions the next will be in line with the rules of WTO. Carbon tariffs or using GATT twentieth environment exception clauses to demonstrate its legality. At the same time, the paper also on China's export trade situation and energy consumption and other aspects of analysis, in order to obtain carbon tariffs on May China's export trade caused by the deterioration of the export environment, increase industrial manufacturing exports cost caused by exports decreased to some extent, promote the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure, promote the development and influence of low carbon economy. And for these effects, put forward the countermeasures to take measures to deal with the carbon tariffs in China from the international and domestic two level, in order to benefit our country take time for carbon tariffs.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;F752

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李曉玲;陳雨松;;“碳關(guān)稅”與WTO規(guī)則相符性研究[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2010年03期

2 謝來(lái)輝;;歐盟應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化的邊境調(diào)節(jié)稅:新的貿(mào)易壁壘[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2008年02期

3 徐馳;;碳關(guān)稅對(duì)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的影響分析及應(yīng)對(duì)措施——以中美貿(mào)易為例[J];技術(shù)監(jiān)督教育學(xué)刊;2009年01期

4 曹靜;陳粹粹;;“碳關(guān)稅”:當(dāng)前熱點(diǎn)爭(zhēng)論與研究綜述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2010年01期

5 韓利琳;;碳關(guān)稅貿(mào)易壁壘對(duì)中國(guó)的影響及對(duì)策研究[J];人文雜志;2010年05期

6 顏克益;巫景飛;;碳關(guān)稅相關(guān)研究綜述[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2010年32期

7 曲如曉;吳潔;;論碳關(guān)稅的福利效應(yīng)[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2011年04期

8 宋海英;岑穎;;碳關(guān)稅影響國(guó)際貿(mào)易的研究述評(píng)[J];浙江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 萬(wàn)毅;低碳時(shí)代碳關(guān)稅征收的一般均衡分析[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

2 張倩;“碳關(guān)稅”貿(mào)易壁壘的挑戰(zhàn)及法律對(duì)策研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年

3 張瑞芳;碳關(guān)稅的實(shí)施機(jī)制及其對(duì)我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的影響[D];安徽大學(xué);2013年

4 李永華;碳關(guān)稅對(duì)我國(guó)出口貿(mào)易的影響研究[D];中南大學(xué);2012年

5 張曉丹;我國(guó)開征碳稅問(wèn)題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1381911