【摘要】： 股東代表訴訟在英美國(guó)家創(chuàng)設(shè)產(chǎn)生已有百余年的歷史,在公司及其中小股東權(quán)益受到侵害時(shí),由股東代替公司提起訴訟的一種特殊救濟(jì)制度。我國(guó)公司法律制度直至2005年10月27日修訂的新《公司法》才首次引入該制度。必須承認(rèn),在股東派生訴訟的問(wèn)題上,已經(jīng)發(fā)表了相當(dāng)數(shù)量的專著或者期刊分析的文章。但我們?nèi)匀挥欣碛缮钊胩接戇@個(gè)沖突性和復(fù)雜性都很強(qiáng)的題目。股東代表訴訟制度作為法律制度設(shè)計(jì)上保護(hù)中小股東利益的最后一道防線,它要作為一項(xiàng)能真正發(fā)揮其實(shí)際功效的訴訟法律制度,必然離不開具體而細(xì)致的規(guī)則和程序方面的考證和設(shè)計(jì)。 本文通過(guò)詳細(xì)研究中國(guó)中期期貨案件,以一種實(shí)務(wù)和比較的視角對(duì)股東代表訴訟制度的價(jià)值加以考量,對(duì)其制度設(shè)計(jì)進(jìn)行反思和研究,最終試圖對(duì)我國(guó)新《公司法》剛剛確立的這一法律制度的更加完善有所補(bǔ)益,以期使其更加具體化、更具操作性,從而更好地發(fā)揮其功能。本文以務(wù)實(shí)的理念和方法為統(tǒng)領(lǐng),同時(shí)運(yùn)用了系統(tǒng)分析、比較法研究、實(shí)證分析、法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析等方法,以用辯證和嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)倪壿嬎悸吠瓿闪巳牡陌咐治龊徒?gòu)。 本文共分為三個(gè)章節(jié)。 第一章是關(guān)于中國(guó)中期期貨案件和股東代表訴訟的簡(jiǎn)單概述。文章首先介紹了中國(guó)中期期貨案件的來(lái)龍去脈,引出股東派生訴訟這個(gè)概念,然后界定了股東派生訴訟的概念和特征,再對(duì)其賴以存在的法理基礎(chǔ)和制度的功能進(jìn)行了分析,最后對(duì)其產(chǎn)生和推廣的歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的論述。 第二章結(jié)合中國(guó)中期期貨案件,分析股東派生訴訟核心內(nèi)容的境內(nèi)外的考察,對(duì)派生訴訟制度進(jìn)行法視角的透析。從派生訴訟法律關(guān)系的原告資格、被告資格、前置程序、訴訟費(fèi)用補(bǔ)償和訴訟防御等五個(gè)方面加以深入解析。 第三章是集中于股東代表訴訟的本土化分析。該部分在案例分析的基礎(chǔ)上,介紹了我國(guó)股東代表訴訟的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法實(shí)踐,并從股東代表訴訟的原告資格、被告資格、激勵(lì)機(jī)制和制約機(jī)制的角度出發(fā),提出筆者在此方面的完善現(xiàn)行立法的建議,以期提高股東代表訴訟的實(shí)用性。
[Abstract]:Shareholder representative litigation has been established in the United Kingdom and the United States for more than one hundred years. When the rights and interests of the company and its minority shareholders are infringed, shareholders take the place of a special relief system. It is not until the new Company Law revised on October 27, 2005 that the company law system of our country is introduced for the first time. It must be admitted that a considerable number of monographs or journal analyses have been published on shareholder derivative litigation. But we still have reason to explore this conflict and complexity of the topic in depth. As the last line of defense to protect the interests of minority shareholders in the design of the legal system, the shareholder representative litigation system should be regarded as a litigation legal system that can give full play to its actual effect. Must not be separated from specific and detailed rules and procedures of textual research and design. Through a detailed study of China's medium-term futures cases, this paper considers the value of shareholder representative litigation system from a practical and comparative perspective, and rethinks and studies its system design. Finally, the author tries to make up for the perfection of this legal system just established by the new Company Law of our country, in order to make it more concrete and operational, so as to give full play to its function. Under the guidance of pragmatic ideas and methods, this paper uses the methods of systematic analysis, comparative law research, empirical analysis, law and economics analysis, etc., to complete the case analysis and construction of the full text with dialectical and rigorous logic train of thought. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is a brief overview of China's medium-term futures cases and shareholder representative litigation. This paper first introduces the origin and context of China's medium-term futures cases, introduces the concept of shareholder derivative litigation, then defines the concept and characteristics of shareholder derivative litigation, and then analyzes the legal basis and the function of the system on which it exists. Finally, the historical development of its emergence and promotion is simply discussed. The second chapter analyzes the core contents of shareholder derivative litigation and analyzes the derivative litigation system from the perspective of law, combining with the medium term futures cases in China, this chapter analyzes the core contents of shareholder derivative litigation at home and abroad. From the derived litigation legal relations plaintiff qualification, defendant qualification, pre-procedure, litigation costs compensation and litigation defense and other five aspects of in-depth analysis. The third chapter focuses on the localization analysis of shareholder representative litigation. On the basis of case analysis, this part introduces the current legislative situation and judicial practice of shareholder representative litigation in China, and starts from the angles of plaintiff qualification, defendant qualification, incentive mechanism and restriction mechanism of shareholder representative litigation. The author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the current legislation in order to improve the practicability of shareholder representative litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 蘇力;當(dāng)代中國(guó)法律中的習(xí)慣——一個(gè)制定法的透視[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年03期

2 宣偉華;股東代表訴訟初探[J];法學(xué);1999年06期

3 羅培新;;新《公司法》框架下的司法裁判困境[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 曾培芳,盛建明;英國(guó)公司法中的派生訴訟初探──少數(shù)股股東權(quán)利的救濟(jì)之一[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年03期

5 張民安;派生訴訟研究[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1998年06期

6 羅培新;股東派生訴訟若干問(wèn)題探討[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;1999年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張婷婷;股東代表訴訟制度若干問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 張弘;公司法中的股東派生訴訟制度比較研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

3 周習(xí)愚;論我國(guó)股東派生訴訟制度的完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2439783