公司法人格否認中股東責任性質研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-08 18:32
【摘要】：公司法人格否認制度中股東責任性質本是一個很有爭議的問題,2005年被《公司法》的原則規(guī)定使得該問題變得更加撲朔迷離,目前,雖然學者對此研究已形成洋洋宏論,但因角度不同,結論難以統一�？紤]到該問題具有很深的理論價值和很廣的應用范疇,筆者主張應立足我國的公司實踐,對此具體問題具體分析。 公司法人格否認制度的創(chuàng)立目的是防止公司法人人格的濫用,以保護公司債權人及社會公眾利益免受不法侵害,我國《公司法》第20條規(guī)定由股東承擔連帶責任,然而連帶責任它可以是共同連帶責任又可以是補充連帶責任,法律僅僅泛泛規(guī)定了連帶責任,這讓實際處理問題時遇到很多問題,司法實踐中法官對此難以界定,因此只會做出股東承擔連帶責任的判決,對于判決的性質以及其他問題就留給了執(zhí)行階段,將問題更加復雜化。 按照學者的研究,公司法人格濫用大致分為資本顯著不足、人格混同、股東的過度控制、公司形骸化這幾種常見情形。 論文從探求公司法人格否認制度的價值追求入手,依照公平與正義的理念,在國內外理論以及實踐的基礎上通過典型的案例對這幾種常見情形下股東的責任進行分析研究,試圖通過具體問題具體分析的辦法探討股東連帶責任的性質及其承擔方式。
[Abstract]:The nature of shareholder liability in the system of denying corporate personality is a controversial issue, which was made more complicated by the principles of Company Law in 2005. But because of the different angle, the conclusion is difficult to unify. In view of the deep theoretical value and wide range of application of this problem, the author proposes that it should be based on the company practice in our country, and analyze the specific problems in detail. The purpose of the system of denying corporate personality is to prevent the abuse of corporate personality in order to protect the creditors of the company and the public interests from unlawful infringement. Article 20 of the Company Law of our country stipulates that the joint and several liability shall be borne by the shareholders. However, joint and several liability can be joint and several liability or supplementary joint liability. The law only generally stipulates joint and several liability, which makes it difficult for the judge to define the joint liability when dealing with problems in practice. As a result, only shareholders will be liable for joint and several judgments, the nature of the decision and other issues left to the implementation stage, will further complicate the issue. According to the research of scholars, the abuse of corporate personality can be divided into several common situations, such as significant capital deficiency, personality confusion, excessive control of shareholders and corporatization. Based on the theory and practice at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the responsibility of shareholders in these common cases by exploring the value pursuit of the denial system of corporate personality, in accordance with the concept of fairness and justice, and on the basis of the theory and practice at home and abroad. This paper attempts to discuss the nature of joint and several liability of shareholders and its way of undertaking through concrete analysis of specific problems.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
本文編號：2404970
[Abstract]:The nature of shareholder liability in the system of denying corporate personality is a controversial issue, which was made more complicated by the principles of Company Law in 2005. But because of the different angle, the conclusion is difficult to unify. In view of the deep theoretical value and wide range of application of this problem, the author proposes that it should be based on the company practice in our country, and analyze the specific problems in detail. The purpose of the system of denying corporate personality is to prevent the abuse of corporate personality in order to protect the creditors of the company and the public interests from unlawful infringement. Article 20 of the Company Law of our country stipulates that the joint and several liability shall be borne by the shareholders. However, joint and several liability can be joint and several liability or supplementary joint liability. The law only generally stipulates joint and several liability, which makes it difficult for the judge to define the joint liability when dealing with problems in practice. As a result, only shareholders will be liable for joint and several judgments, the nature of the decision and other issues left to the implementation stage, will further complicate the issue. According to the research of scholars, the abuse of corporate personality can be divided into several common situations, such as significant capital deficiency, personality confusion, excessive control of shareholders and corporatization. Based on the theory and practice at home and abroad, this paper analyzes the responsibility of shareholders in these common cases by exploring the value pursuit of the denial system of corporate personality, in accordance with the concept of fairness and justice, and on the basis of the theory and practice at home and abroad. This paper attempts to discuss the nature of joint and several liability of shareholders and its way of undertaking through concrete analysis of specific problems.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D922.291.91
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 徐瓊;;揭開公司人格否認理論的面紗[J];電子科技大學學報(社科版);2006年06期
2 陳凡;;公司法人格否認制度在我國司法實踐的應用及完善[J];法制與社會;2009年19期
3 彭德行;;淺議我國《公司法》第20條的適用條件[J];法制與社會;2010年03期
4 郭富青;論公司人格否認原則的理論基礎及適用條件[J];中央政法管理干部學院學報;1999年01期
5 趙信忠;對我國適用公司法人格否認法理的質疑[J];河北法學;1999年04期
6 張宗敏;;公司法人格否認中控制股東責任性質之探討[J];河北法學;2006年01期
7 李昌玉;;控制股東對第三人民事責任的性質[J];長江大學學報(社會科學版);2007年02期
8 朱慈蘊;公司法人格否認法理與公司的社會責任[J];法學研究;1998年05期
9 馬tD;;論公司法中的揭開公司面紗制度[J];遼寧經濟;2009年01期
10 朱慈蘊;;公司法人格否認：從法條躍入實踐[J];清華法學;2007年02期
，本文編號：2404970
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2404970.html
