本文選題：公司法案例 + 公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 董事制度是公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)的核心,董事責(zé)任制度又是董事制度的重中之重。董事的義務(wù)與責(zé)任是學(xué)者關(guān)心的熱點問題,但學(xué)者的目光多聚集在董事對公司的責(zé)任身上,較少涉及董事對債權(quán)人的責(zé)任。這一狀況與我國公司法在制定董事責(zé)任制度時過于強(qiáng)調(diào)董事對公司的責(zé)任,而忽視董事對債權(quán)人的責(zé)任不無關(guān)系。本文旨在對董事對公司債權(quán)人的責(zé)任進(jìn)行探析,以期完善我國董事責(zé)任制度,加強(qiáng)對董事的規(guī)制和債權(quán)人利益的保護(hù),本文的研究內(nèi)容分為以下五個部分： 第一章董事對公司債權(quán)人責(zé)任承擔(dān)的案例 本部分選取了兩個關(guān)于董事對公司債權(quán)人責(zé)任承擔(dān)的案例,分別是我國的偉發(fā)服裝公司訴明達(dá)玩具公司侵犯注冊商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案和美國的弗朗西斯訴聯(lián)合澤西銀行案。 第二章兩案涉及的公司法理論 董事對債權(quán)人的侵權(quán)事件屢屢發(fā)生,可傳統(tǒng)公司法與現(xiàn)代公司法對董事是否對公司債權(quán)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任有著不同的認(rèn)識。當(dāng)前,為了維護(hù)市場交易安全和保護(hù)公司利益,董事對債權(quán)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任已是非常必要的制度。 第三章董事對公司債權(quán)人責(zé)任承擔(dān)的立法與司法實踐 通過考察兩大法系中各國關(guān)于董事對公司債權(quán)人承擔(dān)責(zé)任的立法例和司法實踐,發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)今世界各國公司法日趨重視公司自身利益與社會利益的平衡,確立這一責(zé)任形式是與當(dāng)代公司立法發(fā)展趨向相一致的；對我國相關(guān)法律規(guī)定進(jìn)行了分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國部分立法中對這一制度雖已有突破,但仍有不足。 第四章董事對公司債權(quán)人責(zé)任承擔(dān)的法律性質(zhì) 董事對公司債權(quán)人責(zé)任承擔(dān)的性質(zhì)在兩大法系有不同的認(rèn)識,但也有相通之處。通過全面解析,發(fā)現(xiàn)董事的這一責(zé)任本質(zhì)上是一種侵權(quán)責(zé)任。 第五章兩案對完善我國相關(guān)法律之啟示 通過相關(guān)案例的分析,本部分從派生訴訟制度的引進(jìn)和完善、董事承擔(dān)責(zé)任的形式和歸責(zé)原則以及董事責(zé)任限制等方面進(jìn)行闡述,并對完善我國董事對債權(quán)人責(zé)任制度提出了相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:The director system is the core of the corporate governance structure, and the director responsibility system is the most important part of the director system. The duties and responsibilities of directors are hot issues concerned by scholars, but most of them focus on the responsibility of directors to the company, less on the responsibility of directors to creditors. This situation has something to do with the fact that the company law of our country emphasizes the director's responsibility to the company and neglects the director's responsibility to the creditor when formulating the director's liability system. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the liability of directors to the creditors of the company, in order to perfect the liability system of directors in China, strengthen the regulation of directors and protect the interests of creditors. The research content of this paper is divided into the following five parts: the first chapter is the case of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company. This part selects two parts about the directors' responsibility to the creditors of the company Cases of liability, China's Weinfa Garment Company v. Minda Toy Company infringes the exclusive right to use the registered trademark case and the United States case of Francis v. Bank of Jersey. The second chapter two cases involve the company law theory director to the creditor torts the incident to occur frequently, but the traditional company law and the modern company law have the different understanding to whether the director bears the civil liability to the company creditor. At present, in order to safeguard the security of market transactions and protect the interests of companies, it is necessary for directors to bear civil liability to creditors. The third chapter: the legislation and judicial practice of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company. Through the investigation of the legislation and judicial practice of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company in the two legal systems, It is found that the company law of various countries in the world is paying more and more attention to the balance between the interests of the company itself and the interests of the society, and the establishment of this responsibility form is consistent with the development trend of the contemporary company legislation, and the relevant laws and regulations of our country are analyzed. It is found that although there has been a breakthrough in some legislation of our country, there are still some deficiencies. The fourth chapter: the legal nature of the directors' liability to the creditors of the company; the nature of the liability of the directors to the creditors of the company has different understandings in the two legal systems, but there are also similarities. Through comprehensive analysis, it is found that the director's liability is essentially a tort liability. Chapter five: the inspiration of the two cases to the improvement of the relevant laws in China. Through the analysis of relevant cases, this part introduces and perfects the derivative litigation system. This paper expounds the forms and principles of directors' liability and the limitation of directors' liability, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of directors' liability to creditors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 邊蕊;論董事對公司債權(quán)人的責(zé)任[D];中國政法大學(xué);2012年

2 王磊;論我國公司法對中小股東權(quán)益的完善[D];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

3 熊宇文;公司董事對公司債權(quán)人責(zé)任法律制度研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2012年

4 周文慧;論董事對第三人責(zé)任[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

5 張媛媛;董事對第三人損害賠償責(zé)任研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2094719