本文選題：一人公司 + 法人格否認(rèn)　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公司獨(dú)立人格和股東有限責(zé)任是現(xiàn)代公司制度的核心。對刺激投資、活躍資本市場發(fā)揮著極其重要的作用。然，因自然人的趨利性傾向，為謀取經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的最大化，有可能利用此兩項(xiàng)制度從事?lián)p害他人利益的行為，對于只有一個自然人股東或一個法人股東的一人公司而言，這種可能性顯著增大，且現(xiàn)實(shí)中也廣泛存在這種問題，基于防止此濫用可能性的需要而設(shè)立公司人格否認(rèn)制度�！豆痉ā返�20條規(guī)定公司股東濫用此兩項(xiàng)制度逃避債務(wù)嚴(yán)重?fù)p害債權(quán)人利益的，，應(yīng)對公司債務(wù)承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任，《公司法》第64條規(guī)定了股東證明自己財(cái)產(chǎn)獨(dú)立于公司財(cái)產(chǎn)的舉證責(zé)任，此兩條規(guī)定了一人公司適用公司人格否認(rèn)追究股東責(zé)任的基本制度框架，但內(nèi)容非常原則。實(shí)踐中運(yùn)用這一規(guī)則追究股東責(zé)任受到很大限制，為此，厘清公司法人格否認(rèn)規(guī)則下一人公司股東無限責(zé)任的適用具有實(shí)際意義。 一人公司股東的無限責(zé)任問題已成為時下研究的一大難點(diǎn)和重點(diǎn)。對于此問題，筆者試從一人公司法人格否認(rèn)的角度探析一人股東的無限責(zé)任，通過與有限責(zé)任的對比分析，明確需要股東承擔(dān)無限責(zé)任的要件及場合，以期為我國今后法理研究和司法實(shí)踐中所面臨的一人公司股東無限責(zé)任問題起到拋磚引玉的作用。 在公司人格的獨(dú)立和分離原則的支持下，有限責(zé)任制度滿足了人們規(guī)避風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的意思極大地刺激了投資，有效推動社會經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。但在股東僅追求經(jīng)濟(jì)利益罔顧公平價(jià)值的時候，往往濫用法人獨(dú)立人格，背離分離原則，往往脫離公司法人制度的宗旨，導(dǎo)致濫設(shè)法人、抽逃資金、業(yè)務(wù)混同、組織機(jī)構(gòu)混同等行為的大量涌現(xiàn)，而當(dāng)其在逃避法律、合同義務(wù)受到法律追究時卻又主張有限責(zé)任，以致債權(quán)人的利益受到侵害。 要堅(jiān)持理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際，在對適用無限責(zé)任要件進(jìn)行更進(jìn)一步系統(tǒng)理論研究的同時，仔細(xì)分析一人公司法人格否認(rèn)案件，通過對案例的梳理歸納，對濫用公司法人格的行為進(jìn)行體系化研究，使理論與實(shí)踐不斷磨合，不斷地完善一人公司適用公司法人格否認(rèn)制度，以保障債權(quán)人利益，維護(hù)經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系穩(wěn)定，推動經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Independent personality and limited liability of shareholders are the core of modern company system. To stimulate investment, active capital markets play an extremely important role. However, in order to maximize the economic benefits of natural persons, it is possible to use these two systems to do harm to the interests of others because of the tendency of natural persons to profit, for a one-person company with only one natural person shareholder or one legal person shareholder, This possibility has increased significantly, and the problem is widespread in reality. Based on the need to prevent this possibility of abuse, a system of denial of corporate personality is established. Article 20 of the Company Law stipulates that the shareholders of a company abuse these two systems to evade debts and seriously harm the interests of creditors. Article 64 of the Company Law stipulates the burden of proof for shareholders to prove that their property is independent of the company's property. These two articles stipulate the basic institutional framework for one-person companies to apply corporate personality denial to investigate shareholders' liability. But the content is very principled. In practice, the application of this rule to the investigation of shareholders' liability is greatly restricted. Therefore, it is of practical significance to clarify the application of unlimited liability of shareholders in one-person companies under the rules of corporate personality denial. The problem of unlimited liability of shareholders in one-man company has become one of the most difficult problems and emphases in current research. For this problem, the author tries to analyze the unlimited liability of one person shareholder from the angle of denying the personality of one-person company law. Through the comparison and analysis with the limited liability, it is clear that the requirement and occasion for shareholders to bear unlimited liability. It is expected that the problem of unlimited liability of shareholders of one-person company will play an important role in the future legal research and judicial practice of our country. Supported by the principle of independence and separation of corporate personality, the limited liability system satisfies people's intention of avoiding risks and greatly stimulates investment and effectively promotes social and economic development. However, when the shareholders only pursue economic interests and ignore the fair value, they often abuse the independent personality of legal persons, deviate from the principle of separation, and often deviate from the purpose of the corporate system of the company, leading to excessive efforts to make people, withdraw funds, and mix business with each other. A large number of behaviors such as mixed organization emerge, but when they are evading the law, the contractual obligations are investigated by law, but they advocate limited liability, and the interests of creditors are infringed. It is necessary to adhere to the combination of theory and practice, while making further systematic theoretical research on the application of unlimited liability elements, and at the same time, carefully analyze the case of one person's denial of corporate personality, and sum up the case by combing and summarizing the case. By systematizing the behavior of abusing the personality of company law, the theory and practice are constantly combined, and the system of denying the personality of company law is constantly perfected, in order to protect the interests of creditors, maintain the stability of economic relations and promote the development of economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 石少俠;;公司人格否認(rèn)制度的司法適用[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期

2 趙旭東;;公司法人格否認(rèn)規(guī)則適用情況分析[J];法律適用;2011年10期

3 戚鼎;;淺談一人公司[J];法制與社會;2009年07期

4 李建偉;;公司法人格否認(rèn)規(guī)則在一人公司的適用——以《公司法》第64條為中心[J];求是學(xué)刊;2009年02期

5 柳經(jīng)緯;股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓與一人公司問題探討[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年01期

6 李黎明;;論我國一人公司的法律規(guī)制[J];武漢工程大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

本文編號：2087513