本文選題：中小企業(yè) + 企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自上世紀(jì)20年代以來,企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任運(yùn)動(dòng)伴隨經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家不斷興起,國(guó)外學(xué)界對(duì)此進(jìn)行了持續(xù)而廣泛的研究。鑒于該運(yùn)動(dòng)所形成和發(fā)展的背景是企業(yè)的日益巨型化所引發(fā)的不斷嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)問題,所以,國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)界的相關(guān)研究也主要是針對(duì)大企業(yè)以及大企業(yè)所引發(fā)的社會(huì)問題日趨嚴(yán)重而提出的,所提供的對(duì)策也基本上是針對(duì)大企業(yè)的要求,很少涉及中小企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任問題。在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的當(dāng)今時(shí)代,中小企業(yè)對(duì)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展所起到的作用也日益明顯,其所引發(fā)的社會(huì)問題(尤其是負(fù)面問題)已不容忽視。在倡導(dǎo)經(jīng)濟(jì)健康、可持續(xù)發(fā)展的今天,不論是為了社會(huì)公益,還是為了自身的生存發(fā)展,中小企業(yè)都應(yīng)適時(shí)適度地承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的社會(huì)責(zé)任。 中小企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任離不開健全的法制規(guī)范。雖然我國(guó)《公司法》、《合伙企業(yè)法》、《產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量法》、《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》、《勞動(dòng)法》、《勞動(dòng)合同法》、《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》等法律直接或間接地涉及到包括中小企業(yè)在內(nèi)的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任,其中《合伙企業(yè)法》、《公司法》更是明確規(guī)定企業(yè)(公司)應(yīng)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任,但是,這些立法規(guī)定或者過于原則,或者未以企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任理念來統(tǒng)籌設(shè)計(jì)從而顯得零散,或者因監(jiān)督機(jī)制缺乏而實(shí)施乏力。由此可見,我國(guó)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法制建設(shè)還極為薄弱。鑒此,本文采用比較研究與實(shí)證分析等方法,擬對(duì)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法律問題作深入探討。 除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外,全文共分為6個(gè)部分。 第一部分是對(duì)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的一般詮釋。本部分在考察和分析學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的定義的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任作出筆者的界定,即:企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任是指企業(yè)在謀求股東利潤(rùn)最大化之外所負(fù)有的維護(hù)和增進(jìn)社會(huì)利益的義務(wù),具體為對(duì)所有非股東利益相關(guān)者所負(fù)有的維護(hù)和增進(jìn)其利益的義務(wù)。同時(shí),本部分立足調(diào)研資料所反映的實(shí)際,對(duì)“中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任”的內(nèi)涵及范圍作出界定。 第二部分涉及的是中小企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的狀況問題。首先對(duì)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任缺失的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行總結(jié),如漠視員工權(quán)益、忽視環(huán)境保護(hù)、產(chǎn)品服務(wù)質(zhì)量不高、缺乏慈善責(zé)任意識(shí)等,進(jìn)而分別從理論與實(shí)踐層面,以法學(xué)的視角,深入分析中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任角色缺失的深層次原因。 第三部分是對(duì)中小企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的正當(dāng)性及可行性進(jìn)行分析。明確了中小企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的正當(dāng)性在于:首先,中小企業(yè)作為企業(yè),是多方利益相關(guān)者相互作用的綜合體,非股東利益相關(guān)者并不像傳統(tǒng)理論所假定的那樣脫離了所謂的企業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),其次,中小企業(yè)提供的產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)具有貼近人們?nèi)粘Ｉ畹奶攸c(diǎn),對(duì)整個(gè)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定起著關(guān)鍵性的作用,因此,中小企業(yè)應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任。同時(shí),中小企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任將有助于企業(yè)的生存發(fā)展,有助于企業(yè)走出國(guó)門,有助于市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)健康發(fā)展,并因此促進(jìn)中小企業(yè)自身的發(fā)展。 第四部分是對(duì)我國(guó)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任相關(guān)立法的梳理與評(píng)價(jià)。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《公司法》、《合伙企業(yè)法》、《產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量法》、《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》、《勞動(dòng)法》、《勞動(dòng)合同法》、《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》等法律法規(guī)對(duì)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任作了某些規(guī)定,但這些規(guī)定或過于原則、缺乏可操作性,或立法效力缺乏普遍適用性,總之,目前我國(guó)關(guān)于企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的立法缺乏統(tǒng)一的理念,而專門針對(duì)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的立法仍屬空白。 第五部分是對(duì)構(gòu)建我國(guó)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法律制度的建議。本部分首先介紹美歐企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法運(yùn)動(dòng)的相關(guān)知識(shí),從而總結(jié)出其對(duì)我國(guó)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法運(yùn)動(dòng)的啟示。之后提出我國(guó)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法律制度構(gòu)建的基本思路,即,首先要解決包括中小企業(yè)在內(nèi)的企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的一般的立法體例問題;其次要以企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任為導(dǎo)向調(diào)適中小企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu);再次要建立并完善中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的激勵(lì)機(jī)制。 第六部分,建立完善中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的外部監(jiān)督機(jī)制。鑒于中小企業(yè)相較大企業(yè)而言社會(huì)責(zé)任意識(shí)更加淡漠,而調(diào)適企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu),建立其社會(huì)責(zé)任的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督機(jī)制對(duì)中小企業(yè)來說難度較大,故而欲落實(shí)中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任,除應(yīng)通過宣傳、教育等方式強(qiáng)化中小企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任感外,更應(yīng)注重中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任法律制度的實(shí)施,而其關(guān)鍵又在于中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任監(jiān)督體系的建立與完善。為此,本文將對(duì)中小企業(yè)踐行社會(huì)責(zé)任的監(jiān)督主體、保障途徑等問題展開研究。
[Abstract]:Since the 20s of last century, the movement of corporate social responsibility (CSR), with economic globalization in developed countries, has been continuously and extensively studied by foreign academics. In view of the background of the formation and development of the movement, the serious social problems caused by the increasing giant of the enterprise, therefore, the relevant research at home and abroad It is also put forward mainly for the serious social problems caused by large enterprises and large enterprises. The countermeasures are also basically aimed at the requirements of large enterprises and seldom involve the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises. In the present era of economic globalization, the role of small and medium enterprises in social economic development is increasingly obvious, The social problems (especially the negative problems) caused can not be ignored. In advocating economic health and sustainable development, small and medium enterprises should take appropriate social responsibility in time, whether for social public welfare or for their own survival and development.
The implementation of social responsibility for small and medium-sized enterprises is inseparable from the sound legal norms. Although the law of the company, the partnership enterprise law, the product quality law, the consumer protection law, the labor law, the labor contract law, and the environmental protection law directly or indirectly involve the corporate social responsibility including small and medium enterprises, including the partnership law. >, < Company Law > is more clear that the enterprise (company) should bear social responsibility, but these legislative provisions or too principles, or not with the concept of corporate social responsibility as a whole, appear scattered, or lack of supervision because of the lack of supervision mechanism. Thus, the construction of social responsibility legal system in China's small and medium-sized enterprises is very weak. In this paper, comparative study and empirical analysis are used to explore the legal issues of SMEs' social responsibility.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into 6 parts.
The first part is the general interpretation of the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises. On the basis of the investigation and analysis of the definition of the social responsibility of the enterprise, the author defines the social responsibility of the enterprise, that is, the corporate social responsibility refers to the meaning of maintaining and enhancing the social interests of the enterprise in the pursuit of the maximization of the maximization of the profit of the shareholders. At the same time, this part defines the connotation and scope of "the social responsibility of small and medium enterprises" based on the facts reflected in the survey data.
The second part involves the situation of social responsibility for small and medium-sized enterprises. First, it summarizes the performance of the lack of social responsibility for small and medium-sized enterprises, such as ignoring the rights and interests of the employees, ignoring the environmental protection, the quality of the product service is not high, the lack of the consciousness of charitable responsibility and so on, and then from the theoretical and practical level, and in the perspective of law, it analyzes the middle and small size in depth. The deep reasons for the lack of role of corporate social responsibility.
The third part is to analyze the legitimacy and feasibility of the small and medium-sized enterprises to undertake social responsibility. It is clear that the legitimacy of the small and medium-sized enterprises to bear social responsibility lies in the following: first, small and medium-sized enterprises, as enterprises, are the complex of multi stakeholder interaction, and the non shareholder stakeholders are not as divorced from the traditional theory as assumed. Secondly, the products and services provided by small and medium enterprises have the characteristics that close to people's daily life, and play a key role in the stability of the whole society. Therefore, small and medium-sized enterprises should bear social responsibility. At the same time, the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises will help the survival and development of enterprises and help enterprises to go out of the country. Contribute to the healthy development of the market economy, and therefore promote the development of SMEs themselves.
The fourth part is the combing and evaluation of the relevant legislation on social responsibility of small and medium enterprises in China. The current laws and regulations, such as the company law, the partnership enterprise law, the product quality law, the consumer protection law, the labor law, the labor contract law, the environmental protection law, etc., have made some provisions on the corporate social responsibility, but these regulations or too principles, The lack of operability, or the lack of universal applicability of the legislative effect, in short, the current legislation on corporate social responsibility in our country lacks a unified concept, and the legislation specifically aimed at the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises is still a blank.
The fifth part is the proposal to build the legal system of social responsibility of small and medium enterprises in our country. This part first introduces the related knowledge of the movement of corporate social responsibility law in the United States and Europe, and summarizes its enlightenment to the social responsibility law movement of China's enterprises. After that, the basic ideas of the construction of the legal system of social responsibility for small and medium-sized enterprises in China are put forward, that is, first of all, To solve the general legislative problem of corporate social responsibility, including small and medium enterprises, the second is to adjust the governance structure of small and medium-sized enterprises with the guidance of corporate social responsibility, and to establish and improve the incentive mechanism for the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises.
The sixth part, establishing and perfecting the external supervision mechanism of the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises. In view of the small and medium enterprises' social responsibility consciousness is more indifferent, and the adjustment of the corporate governance structure and the establishment of the internal supervision mechanism of its social responsibility is difficult for the small and medium enterprises, so it is necessary to carry out the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises. Publicity, education and other ways to strengthen the sense of social responsibility of small and medium enterprises should pay more attention to the implementation of the legal system of social responsibility for small and medium-sized enterprises, and the key is to establish and improve the supervision system of the social responsibility of small and medium-sized enterprises. This paper will study the subject of the supervision of the social responsibility of small and medium enterprises and the ways of ensuring the social responsibility.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D920.4;F270

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王文泉;石油國(guó)企的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];北京石油管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

2 閆振;;偶像追捧與媒體的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];紅旗文稿;2005年15期

3 賴娟;李莉;;和諧社會(huì)下的公司社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];和田師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

4 周瑞玲;;試論公司的社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];中共山西省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

5 石永紅;;給壟斷行業(yè)戴上社會(huì)責(zé)任的“緊箍咒”[J];吉林人大工作;2007年03期

6 滿河軍;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的特性分析[J];中共山西省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

7 滕麗;;法治精神:我國(guó)媒體社會(huì)責(zé)任的價(jià)值向度[J];新聞知識(shí);2007年12期

8 高寒;;監(jiān)獄企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2008年03期

9 高文;;大眾傳播媒介的社會(huì)責(zé)任說略[J];天津市工會(huì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

10 ;堅(jiān)持慈善辦學(xué) 彰顯社會(huì)責(zé)任[J];城市開發(fā);2008年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 王寶森;楊元梅;;媒體類網(wǎng)絡(luò)公司社會(huì)責(zé)任實(shí)證研究——基于消費(fèi)者視角[A];第五屆（2010）中國(guó)管理學(xué)年會(huì)——組織與戰(zhàn)略分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2010年

2 許紅梅;;十一、國(guó)有企業(yè)特殊社會(huì)責(zé)任研究——以中國(guó)移動(dòng)為例[A];2010中國(guó)國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展論壇暨“中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變與國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

3 ;踐行責(zé)任 和諧共贏——中國(guó)洗滌用品行業(yè)企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任倡議書[A];第27屆[2007]中國(guó)洗滌用品行業(yè)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

4 廉春慧;唐婉虹;;社會(huì)責(zé)任、社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露與公司聲譽(yù)[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)高等工科院校分會(huì)2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

5 談多嬌;;社會(huì)責(zé)任投資與企業(yè)市場(chǎng)價(jià)值的關(guān)聯(lián)性研究:一個(gè)模型[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)財(cái)務(wù)管理專業(yè)委員會(huì)2009年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

6 范健;王建文;;上市公司高管社會(huì)責(zé)任及其法律規(guī)制初探[A];北京論壇（2007）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——人類文明的多元發(fā)展模式：“全球化趨勢(shì)中跨國(guó)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略與企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任”法學(xué)分論壇論文或摘要集（下）[C];2007年

7 陳曉安;;基于共生理論視角的中國(guó)保險(xiǎn)業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任研究[A];中國(guó)保險(xiǎn)學(xué)會(huì)第二屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)入選論文集(理論卷2)[C];2010年

8 ;一、從三峽工程的綜合效益看國(guó)企社會(huì)責(zé)任——“2010中國(guó)國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展論壇”中國(guó)長(zhǎng)江三峽集團(tuán)公司副總經(jīng)理林初學(xué)主題演講[A];2010中國(guó)國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展論壇暨“中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變與國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

9 楊慎;;良知是社會(huì)責(zé)任的靈魂[A];第四屆中國(guó)杰出管理者年會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

10 徐向藝;辛杰;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任價(jià)值觀研究——以山東省2200家企業(yè)調(diào)查為例[A];第三屆（2008）中國(guó)管理學(xué)年會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 楊立群 本報(bào)實(shí)習(xí)生 顧泳;我們共同的目標(biāo)：社會(huì)責(zé)任[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

2 記者 趙永新;要求環(huán)評(píng)機(jī)構(gòu)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

3 侯建軍;重利更重義 信譽(yù)促發(fā)展[N];中國(guó)煤炭報(bào);2006年

4 吳勇毅;倡導(dǎo)“企業(yè)公民”的社會(huì)責(zé)任[N];中國(guó)企業(yè)報(bào);2007年

5 劉焱華;企業(yè)：老年人才有所為[N];中國(guó)人事報(bào);2006年

6 本報(bào)記者　 栗玲;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任 也是一種投資[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

7 本期執(zhí)筆 李志軍;也談企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任[N];現(xiàn)代物流報(bào);2007年

8 ;企業(yè)要講社會(huì)責(zé)任[N];新華日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

9 本報(bào)記者 李明慧 周艷;理念提升 行動(dòng)深化[N];國(guó)家電網(wǎng)報(bào);2008年

10 張鐵港;《企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任其實(shí)并不存在》再質(zhì)疑[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 賀星星;社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效[D];暨南大學(xué);2012年

2 徐愛軍;我國(guó)醫(yī)院社會(huì)責(zé)任研究：行為表現(xiàn)、指標(biāo)體系及提升路徑[D];南京大學(xué);2011年

3 張會(huì)芹;政治動(dòng)因與上市公司社會(huì)責(zé)任行為[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

4 何朝暉;中小企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與成長(zhǎng)性關(guān)系研究[D];中南大學(xué);2010年

5 陶冉;跨國(guó)石油公司社會(huì)責(zé)任與財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

6 陳永勝;ICP社會(huì)責(zé)任與網(wǎng)民消費(fèi)理智的相關(guān)關(guān)系研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2011年

7 胡貴毅;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任理論的基本問題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年

8 唐慧;飯店社會(huì)責(zé)任與消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買意向關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

9 李鐘植;中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

10 朱文忠;商業(yè)銀行企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與機(jī)制研究[D];中山大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張曉娜;上市公司社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露審計(jì)研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

2 盧文娟;我國(guó)上市公司社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露現(xiàn)狀研究[D];山東經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;2011年

3 徐鑫巖;論商業(yè)銀行的社會(huì)責(zé)任[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

4 檀麗陽(yáng);公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)、社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的相關(guān)性研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2010年

5 譚超穎;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行社會(huì)責(zé)任評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

6 畢克;我國(guó)銀行業(yè)上市公司履行社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的影響研究[D];中北大學(xué);2011年

7 趙瑩;我國(guó)出版社轉(zhuǎn)企改制后的社會(huì)責(zé)任研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

8 李婧;論企業(yè)在發(fā)展過程中所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的社會(huì)責(zé)任[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

9 朱紅輝;我國(guó)上市公司社會(huì)責(zé)任信息披露市場(chǎng)反應(yīng)研究[D];河南理工大學(xué);2010年

10 茅一嵐;民營(yíng)企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];浙江工商大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1840986