發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-02 23:37

  本文選題：有限責(zé)任公司　切入點(diǎn)：隱名股東　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革深入發(fā)展,中國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域也在逐步完善經(jīng)濟(jì)保障措施,一方面投資領(lǐng)域異�；钴S,另一方面由于投資所帶來的經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛數(shù)量也在不斷增多。隱名投資所帶來的的糾紛就是眾多經(jīng)濟(jì)糾紛中的一種。我國(guó)的《公司法》中并沒有明確規(guī)定隱名股東和顯名股東之間的關(guān)系,有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東資格的認(rèn)定問題也一直是民商事領(lǐng)域中理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)的熱點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)。隱名股東資格的認(rèn)定,不僅涉及到隱名出資人的股東資格和利益,也會(huì)對(duì)公司、公司內(nèi)部其他股東等其他公司法律關(guān)系中的主體的利益造成很大影響。面對(duì)頻繁出現(xiàn)的隱名出資現(xiàn)象,法律不能袖手旁觀不加以規(guī)制,導(dǎo)致可能歪曲經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的正確方向。2011年1月最高人民法院頒布的《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用(中華人民共和國(guó)公司法)若干問題的規(guī)定(三)》對(duì)涉及名義出資人和隱名出資人之間、隱名出資人與公司或其他股東之間,以及隱名出資人與公司外部第三人之間的諸多關(guān)系進(jìn)行了較為明晰的規(guī)定。一定程度上填補(bǔ)了法律的空白,但對(duì)于靈活的商事實(shí)踐來說,“雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”很難得到徹底的適用。因此,對(duì)這一領(lǐng)域的研究,具有理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)的雙重意義。本文通過對(duì)隱名出資人股東資格的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的探討,明確隱名股東的法律地位,在對(duì)有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東資格標(biāo)準(zhǔn)法律現(xiàn)狀分析的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)而提出一些解決方案和建議,希望筆者的這些淺見能為立法、司法提供一些解決思路。本文的主要內(nèi)容分為以下四個(gè)部分：第一部分是隱名股東概述。通過對(duì)隱名股東的來源、概念、法律特征以及類型等基本問題的概括論述,明晰隱名股東概念的內(nèi)涵和外延,確定文章研究問題所涉及的主要概念的范圍,從而為下文的論述奠定基礎(chǔ)。第二部分是有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的原則和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。首先概括歸納中外關(guān)于隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的各種學(xué)說觀點(diǎn),包括形式說、實(shí)質(zhì)說、區(qū)別說。然后從實(shí)踐的視角出發(fā),將隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的證據(jù)應(yīng)從哪些方面來著手進(jìn)行分析。從而得出股東資格認(rèn)定的原則,包括維護(hù)交易安全和公共利益、尊重自由、促進(jìn)交易迅捷以及保持利益平衡維持公司穩(wěn)定。最后從實(shí)質(zhì)要件和形式要件兩個(gè)方面對(duì)隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行分析。第三部分是有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東資格認(rèn)定糾紛的司法實(shí)踐。對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段隱名股東資格認(rèn)定糾紛現(xiàn)狀簡(jiǎn)要介紹,為第四部分隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的制度完善奠定現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。第四部分是有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東資格認(rèn)定制度的完善。根據(jù)前文的分析,得出我國(guó)現(xiàn)行隱名股東資格認(rèn)定的諸多不足,提出制度完善的相應(yīng)措施。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening development of China's economic system reform, China's economic field is gradually improving economic security measures. On the one hand, the investment field is extremely active, on the other hand, the number of economic disputes caused by investment is also increasing.The disputes brought about by anonymous investment are one of many economic disputes.The relationship between dormant shareholders and explicit shareholders is not clearly stipulated in the Company Law of our country. The determination of the qualification of dormant shareholders in limited liability companies has always been a hot and difficult point in theory and practice in the field of civil and commercial affairs.The identification of dormant shareholder's qualification not only involves the shareholder's qualification and interests of the anonymous investor, but also has a great influence on the interests of the main body in the legal relations of other companies, such as the company, other shareholders and so on.In the face of the frequent phenomenon of anonymous capital contribution, the law cannot stand idly by and not regulate it.In January 2011, the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (III), concerning nominal investors and investors, were issued by the Supreme people's Court in January 2011.Between anonymous investors,The relationship between the anonymous investor and the company or other shareholders, as well as between the anonymous investor and the third party outside the company, is clearly regulated.To some extent, it fills the blank of law, but for flexible commercial practice, "double standard" is difficult to be fully applied.Therefore, the study of this field has both theoretical and practical significance.In this paper, through the discussion of the qualification criteria of dormant investors, the legal status of dormant shareholders is clarified. Based on the analysis of the legal status quo of the qualification standards of dormant shareholders in limited liability companies, some solutions and suggestions are put forward.I hope these superficial views can provide some ideas for legislation and judicature.The main content of this paper is divided into the following four parts: the first part is an overview of anonymous shareholders.By summarizing the origin, concept, legal characteristics and types of dormant shareholders, this paper clarifies the connotation and extension of the concept of dormant shareholders, and determines the scope of the main concepts involved in the research.So as to lay the foundation for the following discussion.The second part is the principle and standard of qualification of dormant shareholders of limited liability company.Firstly, it summarizes the various theories about the qualification of dormant shareholders at home and abroad, including formal theory, essence theory and distinction theory.Then, from the perspective of practice, the paper analyzes the evidence of the qualification of dormant shareholders.Thus, the principles of shareholder qualification determination are obtained, including safeguarding transaction security and public interest, respecting freedom, promoting transaction quickness and maintaining the balance of interests to maintain the stability of the company.Finally, the paper analyzes the criteria of qualification of anonymous shareholders from two aspects: substantive and formal elements.The third part is limited liability company hidden shareholder qualification dispute judicial practice.This paper briefly introduces the current situation of dormant shareholder qualification identification dispute in our country, which lays a realistic foundation for perfecting the system of dormant shareholder qualification confirmation in the fourth part.The fourth part is the perfection of the qualification system of dormant shareholders of limited liability company.According to the above analysis, this paper points out the shortcomings of the qualification of anonymous shareholders in our country, and puts forward the corresponding measures to perfect the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 劉永平;;論隱名股東的資格認(rèn)定[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年12期

2 張少聰;胡一朗;;對(duì)股權(quán)分置改革動(dòng)因的博弈分析——對(duì)股東大會(huì)通過違法決議提起訴訟建立的一種博弈模型[J];莆田學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

3 孫聚團(tuán);;論有限責(zé)任公司股東解散請(qǐng)求權(quán)[J];前沿;2006年07期

4 茅姝馨;;公司章程的效力瑕疵問題[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2014年37期

5 李祝用;鮑為民;;金融控股公司的設(shè)立模式研究[J];中國(guó)商法年刊;2006年00期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李祝用;鮑為民;;金融控股公司的設(shè)立模式研究[A];中國(guó)商法年刊（2006）——合伙與合作社法律制度研究[C];2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 林潔;有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東權(quán)利研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2011年

2 徐志敏;論公司章程的法律效力[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

3 蔣飛;公司隱名股東的法律規(guī)制[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

4 董峰君;論隱名股東資格的認(rèn)定[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

5 陳小珍;有限責(zé)任公司股東資格確認(rèn)法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

6 張斌;設(shè)立中公司的法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

7 袁利華;隱名投資問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

8 姜楊;隱名投資法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

9 楊昕煒;論我國(guó)有限責(zé)任公司股東資格的認(rèn)定[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

10 蔡婷婷;隱名投資相關(guān)法律問題研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1702648