本文關(guān)鍵詞： 注意義務(wù) 注意義務(wù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 責(zé)任限制　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代公司治理的一個(gè)重要特點(diǎn)是所有權(quán)與經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的分離,股東不直接執(zhí)行公司事物,董事負(fù)責(zé)公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理。董事作為公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者,其是否勤勉盡責(zé)為公司最佳利益服務(wù)將對(duì)公司的命運(yùn)產(chǎn)生重大的影響。注意義務(wù)基于董事與公司之間的關(guān)系,要求董事必須充分發(fā)揮其才能,并以處在相同位置中一般謹(jǐn)慎人之注意,善意地為公司最佳利益服務(wù)。本文在分析各國(guó)董事注意義務(wù)的立法狀況的基礎(chǔ)上,試圖對(duì)我國(guó)公司法上董事及高級(jí)管理人員的注意義務(wù)的完善提出建議。 本文共分為四章: 第一章通過(guò)介紹董事注意義務(wù)的概念、注意義務(wù)與忠實(shí)義務(wù)的關(guān)系以及注意義務(wù)所包含的內(nèi)容,明確了注意義務(wù)的具體內(nèi)涵,為進(jìn)一步分析注意義務(wù)打下基礎(chǔ)。 第二章從理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)兩方面出發(fā),分析了董事注意義務(wù)的產(chǎn)生。理論基礎(chǔ)著重于分析董事與公司之間的關(guān)系的各種學(xué)說(shuō)及其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)則關(guān)注董事的權(quán)力制約和公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)完善的必要性。 第三章從比較法的角度,介紹了各國(guó)董事注意義務(wù)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷原則,分析了主觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與客觀標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的缺陷以及經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷原則的價(jià)值。 第四章基于以我國(guó)公司法存在的問(wèn)題,提出了我國(guó)公司法上董事注意義務(wù)完善的建議:(1)確立主客觀相結(jié)合的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。(2)把董事和高級(jí)管理人員的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理行為分為決策權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán),適用不同的過(guò)錯(cuò)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。行使決策權(quán)時(shí)違反注意義務(wù)的主觀構(gòu)成要件為重大過(guò)失,行使監(jiān)督權(quán)時(shí)為一般過(guò)失。(3)通過(guò)公司章程、股東大會(huì)決議或者合同對(duì)違反注意義務(wù)的責(zé)任進(jìn)行限制或免除。
[Abstract]:An important feature of modern corporate governance is the separation of ownership and management, the shareholders do not directly implement things, management board is responsible for the company's board of directors. As the leader of the company, whether due diligence for the best interest of the company service will have a significant impact on the fate of the company. Based on the relationship between attention obligation of directors and the company's requirements, the director must give full play to their talents, and to pay attention to the same person in general cautious position, good faith service for the best interests of the company. Based on the analysis of all the attention obligation of the legislative situation, suggestion to duty of care to the company law of China board of directors and senior management personnel..
This article is divided into four chapters.
The first chapter introduces the concept of the director's duty of care, the relationship between the duty of care and the duty of loyalty, the contents of the duty of care, the specific meaning of the duty of care, and lays the foundation for further analysis of the duty of care.
The second chapter from the two aspects of the theoretical basis and practical basis, analysis of the director's duty. Various theories theory focuses on the relationship between the directors and the company's analysis of its advantages and disadvantages. The realistic foundation is concerned the power restriction and perfect corporate governance structure is necessary.
The third chapter, from the perspective of comparative law, introduces the standards of directors' duty of care and the principles of business judgment, analyzes the defects of subjective and objective criteria and the value of business judgment principles.
The fourth chapter is based on the existing problems in China's company law, the company law of our country on the duty of care recommendations: (1) the establishment of a combination of subjective and objective standards. (2) the management behavior of directors and senior management personnel into the power of supervision and decision-making, apply different standards of fault. The right to exercise decision-making in violation of attention subjective elements of liability for gross negligence, the exercise of the right of supervision for general negligence. (3) by the company's articles of association, or the resolution of the general meeting of shareholders of the contract breach of duty of responsibility to exempt or limit.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 楊繼;公司董事“注意義務(wù)”與“忠實(shí)義務(wù)”辨[J];比較法研究;2003年03期

2 李中立;;董事違反注意義務(wù)之責(zé)任追究——以美國(guó)的經(jīng)營(yíng)判斷法則為例[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年03期

3 王保樹(shù);股份有限公司的董事和董事會(huì)[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);1994年01期

4 梅慎實(shí);董事義務(wù)判斷之比較研究[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);1996年01期

5 張民安;董事的法律地位研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1998年02期

6 李燕;;論現(xiàn)代公司之董事注意義務(wù)[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2007年06期

7 官本仁;試論董事的注意義務(wù)[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);1997年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王琦;董事的注意義務(wù)研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

2 王孜孜;董事違反注意義務(wù)的民事責(zé)任研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

3 王平;論公司董事的注意義務(wù)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1530818