本文關(guān)鍵詞： 隱名股東 有限保護(hù)原則 社會(huì)效益原則 隱名投資協(xié)議 股東資格　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隱名股東是按照合同約定,向公司實(shí)際出資,但在公司章程、股東名冊(cè)和工商登記等文件中卻記載為他人的投資人。隱名投資是各國經(jīng)濟(jì)生活中一種普遍存在的現(xiàn)象,隱名股東的法律規(guī)制對(duì)個(gè)體意思自治的保護(hù)、權(quán)利侵害的預(yù)防、對(duì)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定與發(fā)展都有重大意義,尤其在我國當(dāng)前相關(guān)案件頻發(fā)、疑難問題多的背景下,對(duì)隱名股東進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制更顯必要。 從我國的立法狀況來看,雖然我國實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)隱名股東的法律規(guī)制問題進(jìn)行了不懈的探索,但至今為止,我國仍未以法律形式對(duì)這一問題進(jìn)行規(guī)制。正是在這樣的背景下,最高人民法院出臺(tái)了《公司法解釋三》試圖對(duì)隱名股東問題進(jìn)行規(guī)制,但司法解釋的法律效力一直存在爭議,且《公司法解釋三》的制度設(shè)計(jì)也不完善。 針對(duì)這樣的狀況,本文從實(shí)踐的角度出發(fā),結(jié)合法學(xué)理論,對(duì)隱名股東法律規(guī)制的必要性進(jìn)行了研究,通過論述,本文認(rèn)為在未來隱名股東立法規(guī)制的全過程中要始終貫徹有限保護(hù)和社會(huì)效益的理念,把握隱名投資協(xié)議與股東資格這兩條隱名股東法律規(guī)制的主線。一方面,在不違反法律強(qiáng)制性規(guī)定的前提下,法律應(yīng)對(duì)隱名股東的合同自治給予充分的尊重,對(duì)其合同權(quán)益給予有力的保障;另一方面,法律也不能賦予隱名股東以股東資格,使隱名股東的意思自治對(duì)第三人產(chǎn)生效力;同時(shí),法律應(yīng)為隱名股東提供放棄隱名利益、獲得股東資格的機(jī)會(huì)。 在上述論證的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者以隱名投資協(xié)議、隱名股東顯名化、股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓等三個(gè)問題為中心,對(duì)未來隱名股東法律規(guī)制的體系構(gòu)建提出了自己的建議,希望能夠?yàn)殡[名股東的立法規(guī)制提供參考。本文分為導(dǎo)論、正文和結(jié)論三個(gè)部分。 導(dǎo)論部分對(duì)研究背景、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究思路及研究方法進(jìn)行了介紹。 正文分為三章,分別對(duì)隱名股東法律規(guī)制相關(guān)理論問題、隱名股東法律規(guī)制的必要性及隱名股東規(guī)制的制度構(gòu)建進(jìn)行了論述。 第一章,隱名股東之概述。本章通過概念比較,明晰了隱名股東的概念,分析了隱名股東出現(xiàn)的原因,并對(duì)國內(nèi)外隱名股東發(fā)展及規(guī)制狀況進(jìn)行了梳理。 第二章,隱名股東規(guī)制之必要性。本章通過對(duì)理論與實(shí)踐的分析,從個(gè)人、社會(huì)及法律實(shí)踐三個(gè)角度對(duì)通過立法途徑規(guī)制隱名股東的必要性問題進(jìn)行了探討。 第三章,隱名股東規(guī)制體系研究。本章對(duì)隱名股東規(guī)制中的重要制度建設(shè)進(jìn)行了探討,并在學(xué)說對(duì)比、利益分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了作者在隱名股東法律規(guī)制問題上的立法建議。 結(jié)論部分對(duì)全文內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了梳理,并對(duì)作者的立法建議進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Anonymous shareholders are investors who actually contribute to the company in accordance with the contract agreement, but they are recorded as investors in the articles of association, the register of shareholders and the industrial and commercial register, etc. Anonymous investment is a common phenomenon in the economic life of various countries. The legal regulation of dormant shareholders has great significance for the protection of individual autonomy and the prevention of infringement of rights, especially in the context of the frequent occurrence of relevant cases and many difficult problems in our country, especially in the context of social stability and development. It is necessary to regulate the dormant shareholders by law. Judging from the legislative situation of our country, although the practice circles of our country have made unremitting exploration on the legal regulation of hidden shareholders, up to now, our country has not regulated this problem in the form of law. The Supreme people's Court has issued "Company Law interpretation III" to try to regulate the problem of hidden shareholders, but the legal effect of judicial interpretation has always been controversial, and the system design of "Company Law interpretation III" is not perfect. In view of this situation, this paper, from the point of view of practice, combined with the theory of law, studies the necessity of legal regulation of dormant shareholders. This paper holds that in the whole process of legislation and regulation of hidden shareholders in the future, the concept of limited protection and social benefits should always be carried out, and the two main lines of legal regulation of dormant shareholders should be grasped, that is, anonymous investment agreement and shareholder qualification, on the one hand, On the premise of not violating the mandatory provisions of the law, the law should give full respect to the contractual autonomy of dormant shareholders and give effective protection to their contractual rights and interests; on the other hand, the law should not confer shareholder qualifications on hidden shareholders. At the same time, the law should provide the opportunity for the dormant shareholders to give up the hidden interests and obtain the qualification of shareholders. On the basis of the above argumentation, the author puts forward his own suggestions on the construction of the legal regulation system of hidden shareholders in the future, focusing on the three issues of the anonymous investment agreement, the explicit name of the dormant shareholders and the transfer of equity. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction introduces the research background, research status, research ideas and research methods. The text is divided into three chapters, respectively on the hidden shareholders legal regulation related theoretical issues, the necessity of legal regulation of hidden shareholders and the system construction of hidden shareholders regulation. The first chapter is an overview of anonymous shareholders. This chapter clarifies the concept of dormant shareholders, analyzes the reasons for the emergence of dormant shareholders, and combs the development and regulation of anonymous shareholders at home and abroad. Chapter two, the necessity of the regulation of dormant shareholders. Through the analysis of theory and practice, this chapter probes into the necessity of regulating anonymous shareholders through legislation from three angles of individual, society and legal practice. Chapter three, the research on the regulation system of dormant shareholders. This chapter discusses the important institutional construction in the regulation of dormant shareholders, and on the basis of the comparison of theories and the analysis of interests, The author puts forward some legislative suggestions on the legal regulation of dormant shareholders. The conclusion part summarizes the author's legislative suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前5條

1 王成勇,陳廣秀;隱名股東之資格認(rèn)定若干問題探析[J];法律適用;2004年07期

2 虞政平;股東資格的法律確認(rèn)[J];法律適用;2003年08期

3 薛啟明;;有限責(zé)任公司隱名股東法律問題試析[J];山東審判;2007年03期

4 梁鵬,孟志強(qiáng);論公司法風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分配機(jī)制[J];生產(chǎn)力研究;2002年05期

5 趙萬一,葉艷;論商主體的存在價(jià)值及其法律規(guī)制[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前6條

1 劉杰山;意思自治及其在民法中的地位[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

2 朱玉川;論禁止權(quán)利濫用原則[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

3 王旭東;淺議隱名投資[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

4 田原;試論有限責(zé)任公司中的隱名投資問題[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

5 胡衛(wèi);隱名股東法律問題研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

6 劉海安;論禁止權(quán)利濫用[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1528061