本文關(guān)鍵詞：公司歸入權(quán)制度研究　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 公司歸入權(quán) 受信義務(wù) 自我交易 同業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng) 公司機(jī)會(huì) 短線(xiàn)交易

【摘要】： 我國(guó)2005年修改后的《公司法》和《證券法》均規(guī)定了在特定情況下公司享有歸入權(quán),即公司可以將特定主體(董事、監(jiān)事、高級(jí)管理人員及大股東)從事特定行為(違反忠實(shí)義務(wù)的行為和短線(xiàn)交易)所獲收益收歸公司所有。但是我國(guó)的立法規(guī)定相對(duì)來(lái)說(shuō)過(guò)于簡(jiǎn)單,對(duì)公司歸入權(quán)行使的主體、對(duì)象、條件、程序和期限等都沒(méi)有具體而明確的規(guī)定。立法上的諸多缺失就導(dǎo)致該項(xiàng)制度在實(shí)務(wù)操作上面臨了諸多的困難,同時(shí)也造成了司法實(shí)踐在運(yùn)用相關(guān)規(guī)定時(shí)的不便。因此,有必要對(duì)公司歸入權(quán)以及圍繞公司歸入權(quán)建立的相關(guān)制度體系加以設(shè)計(jì)和重構(gòu)。 本文遵循了“制度概述——制度價(jià)值——制度架構(gòu)——我國(guó)立法及其實(shí)踐分析”的思路,在借鑒美國(guó)、英國(guó)、日本、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)等立法規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,具體分析了公司歸入權(quán)制度。本文主要運(yùn)用了歷史考察的方法、比較的方法、價(jià)值分析的方法等,全文分為五個(gè)章節(jié),包括:公司歸入權(quán)制度概述(側(cè)重介紹公司歸入權(quán)的概念,界定該權(quán)利的性質(zhì))、公司歸入權(quán)制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和制度價(jià)值(從制度和法理角度探尋公司歸入權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ),并指出其制度價(jià)值就在于維護(hù)公司財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)益)、公司歸入權(quán)制度之基本架構(gòu)(從主體、適用法律事實(shí)等各個(gè)方面剖析公司歸入權(quán)制度)、公司歸入權(quán)適用中的輔助制度(介紹了信息披露、股東代位訴訟和利益計(jì)算等問(wèn)題)、我國(guó)公司歸入權(quán)制度之檢視與完善。相較于其他研究成果而言,筆者將研究重點(diǎn)放在兩個(gè)方面:其一是公司歸入權(quán)制度的價(jià)值所在,其二是該項(xiàng)制度的體系構(gòu)建。針對(duì)我國(guó)立法現(xiàn)狀,本文指出了我國(guó)立法在規(guī)范對(duì)象、行使主體、適用法律事實(shí)、權(quán)利期間、行使方式等方面的不足,建議我國(guó)在完善相關(guān)立法規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,引入“股東代位訴訟”、“信息披露”等制度,切實(shí)保障公司歸入權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:In 2005, the Company Law and the Securities Law both stipulated that the company has the right of subsumption under certain circumstances, that is, the company can take the specific subject (director, supervisor). Senior managers and major shareholders) who engage in specific acts (violations of obligations of loyalty and short-term transactions) proceeds to the company. But the legislative provisions of our country is relatively simple. The main body, object, condition, procedure and time limit of the exercise of the company's right of ascription are not specific and clear. The lack of legislation leads to many difficulties in the practical operation of the system. At the same time, it also causes the inconvenience of judicial practice in the application of relevant provisions. Therefore, it is necessary to design and reconstruct the corporate taxing right and the related system around it. This article follows the idea of "system overview-institutional value-institutional framework-legislation and its practice analysis of our country", on the basis of drawing lessons from the United States, Britain, Japan, Taiwan and other legislative provisions. This paper mainly uses the method of historical investigation, the method of comparison, the method of value analysis and so on. The full text is divided into five chapters. Including: an overview of the system of corporate subsumption (focusing on the introduction of the concept of corporate ascription to the right to define the nature of the right). The theoretical basis and institutional value of corporate ascription system (from the perspective of institution and legal theory to explore the theoretical basis of corporate ascription right and point out that its institutional value lies in safeguarding the property rights and interests of the company). The basic framework of the system of corporate ascription (from the subject, applicable legal facts and other aspects) analyzes the system of corporate ascription, the auxiliary system in the application of the right of corporate ascription (introduces the information disclosure). The problems of shareholder subrogation and interest calculation are reviewed and perfected in China's corporate taxing system. Compared with other research results. The author focuses on two aspects: one is the value of the system of corporate ascription, the other is the system construction of the system. In view of the current situation of legislation in China, this paper points out that the legislation of our country is regulating the object. To exercise the main body, apply the legal facts, rights during the exercise of the lack of ways and other aspects of the proposed legislation in China on the basis of improving the relevant provisions of the introduction of "shareholder subrogation litigation", "information disclosure" and other systems. To ensure the realization of the company's right to relegate.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王福蕊;徐璐;;短線(xiàn)交易歸入權(quán)性質(zhì)探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2012年07期

2 周春華;;論證券市場(chǎng)短線(xiàn)交易歸入權(quán)制度的瓶頸及其矯正[J];科技信息;2011年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 侯延林;短線(xiàn)交易歸入權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 毛張燕;我國(guó)公司法上歸入權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

3 徐R，

本文編號(hào)：1440271