【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》將扒竊行為新增為盜竊罪的一種獨(dú)立行為方式予以定罪處罰�！缎谭ㄐ拚�(八)》出臺以來,司法實(shí)踐中已經(jīng)大量出現(xiàn)扒竊案件定罪處刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一的現(xiàn)象,直接影響到司法公正。問題主要集中在四點(diǎn)：一是對修正案關(guān)于扒竊條文理解不一致；二是對扒竊行為認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)掌握不一致；三是對扒竊構(gòu)成犯罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)掌握不一致；四是對扒竊不構(gòu)成犯罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)掌握不一致。2013年4月盜竊罪出臺了最新司法解釋,上述問題仍未全部得以解決。 本文結(jié)合重慶市扒竊案件定罪的司法適用現(xiàn)狀,對以上問題進(jìn)行探討：一是扒竊行為的認(rèn)定。首先,扒竊對象包括動產(chǎn)和特殊情形下的不動產(chǎn)附屬部分以及財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益；隨身攜帶指將財(cái)物帶在身上或置于現(xiàn)實(shí)緊密支配之下。其次,扒竊必須發(fā)生在公共場所或者公共交通工具上。公共場所指向全部或部分社會成員開放,能夠自由往來并進(jìn)行社會活動,具有不同程度的開放性與人員復(fù)雜性的場所；公共交通工具指從事旅客運(yùn)輸?shù)母鞣N公共汽車、大中型出租車、火車、船只、飛機(jī)等正在運(yùn)營中的交通工具。最后,特定方式的公開竊取也可認(rèn)定為扒竊。二是扒竊行為定罪問題,一般情況下應(yīng)以實(shí)施完成即定罪,無需法益受到實(shí)際損害。三是結(jié)合刑法總則第13條“但書”規(guī)定,參考2013年4月《關(guān)于辦理盜竊刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》中對盜竊公私財(cái)物數(shù)額較大可以不起訴或免予刑事處罰的情形規(guī)定,對下列扒竊行為可不認(rèn)定為犯罪：扒竊家庭成員或近親屬財(cái)物,獲得諒解的；年滿75周歲的人,因維持最低限度之生活需要,初次扒竊且扒竊金額較小的；已滿16周歲未滿18周歲的未成年人,偶以價值較低的財(cái)物為目標(biāo)實(shí)施扒竊的；被脅迫實(shí)施扒竊,沒有竊得財(cái)物、沒有分得贓物或獲贓較少的；以未達(dá)數(shù)額較大的財(cái)物為扒竊目標(biāo)的未遂犯；以較低價值財(cái)物為扒竊目標(biāo),竊得財(cái)物后全部退贓、退賠,未造成危害后果(包括案外后果)的。
[Abstract]:The amendment to the Criminal Law (8) added pickpocketing to the crime of larceny as an independent form of conduct to be convicted and punished. [8] since the introduction of the Amendment (VIII) of the Criminal Law, In judicial practice, the phenomenon that the standard of conviction and punishment of pickpocketing cases is not uniform has a direct impact on judicial justice. The problems mainly focus on four points: the first is the inconsistent understanding of the provisions of the amendment on pickpocketing; the second is the inconsistent understanding of the standard of identification of pickpocketing; the third is the inconsistency of the criminal standard of pickpocketing; Fourth, the standard of pickpocketing does not constitute a crime is inconsistent. In April 2013, the latest judicial explanation was issued for theft, and the above problems have not been completely solved. Based on the current situation of judicial application in the conviction of pickpocketing cases in Chongqing, this paper probes into the above problems: first, the identification of pickpocketing. First of all, pickpocketing includes movable property and real estate in special circumstances, as well as property interests; carry-on refers to carrying property on the body or under the tight control of reality. Secondly, pickpocketing must occur in public places or on public transport. Public places are open to all or some members of the society, can freely travel and carry out social activities, and have varying degrees of openness and complexity of personnel; Public transport means all kinds of buses, large and medium-sized taxis, trains, ships, planes, etc that are in operation for passenger transport. Finally, a certain form of public theft can also be identified as pickpocketing. The other is the conviction of pickpocketing, which should be completed under normal circumstances, without actual harm to the legal interests. Third, in conjunction with the proviso of Article 13 of the General provisions of the Criminal Law, referring to the explanation of certain issues concerning the applicable Law in handling Criminal cases of Theft in April 2013, it is stipulated that the large amount of stolen public and private property may not be prosecuted or exempted from criminal punishment. The following acts of pickpocketing may not be considered a crime: pickpocketing of family members or close relatives of property, the understanding; A person who has reached the age of 75, for the purpose of maintaining a minimum standard of living, has a relatively small amount of pickpocketing for the first time; a minor who has reached the age of 16 and under the age of 18 may carry out pickpocketing with the object of property of lower value; Those who have been coerced to carry out pickpocketing, have not obtained property, have not been given stolen goods or have received less stolen goods, and have not attempted to commit pickpocketing with the object of pickpocketing not reaching a large amount of property; Taking a lower value property as the target of pickpocketing, if the stolen property is returned to the stolen goods and compensations, and no harmful consequences (including the consequences outside the case) are caused.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 許海波;還犯罪既遂以本來面目——對犯罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)通說的質(zhì)疑[J];東岳論叢;2004年05期

2 張明楷;;盜竊與搶奪的界限[J];法學(xué)家;2006年02期

3 陳興良;相似與區(qū)別:刑法用語的解釋學(xué)分析[J];法學(xué);2000年05期

4 趙栩;;關(guān)于“新”盜竊罪罪狀的理解與適用[J];法制與社會;2011年28期

5 孫璐;;關(guān)于《刑法修正案(八)》中扒竊入罪的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];法制與社會;2012年09期

6 楊忠民;王凱;;修正后的盜竊罪司法適用問題探討[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

7 陳志恒;;盜竊罪司法認(rèn)定的幾個問題——《刑法修正案(八)》的法律適用總結(jié)[J];法制與社會;2011年29期

8 章其彥;伍光輝;;對刑法中扒竊行為的法理分析——以《刑法修正案(八)》為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2012年05期

9 李翔;;新型盜竊罪的司法適用路徑[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

10 吳加明;;《刑法修正案(八)》中“扒竊”的司法實(shí)踐認(rèn)定[J];中國檢察官;2011年14期

，

本文編號：2405474