【摘要】：為順應(yīng)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展需要,近十多年的民事司法改革一直朝著更快更徹底解決社會(huì)矛盾的方向而努力,其取得的成績(jī)是有目共睹的。但不可否認(rèn)的是在改革中所暴露出來(lái)的問(wèn)題也同樣需要引起反思,由于之前改革偏重西方的當(dāng)事人主義和程序主義而對(duì)我國(guó)社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)情況關(guān)注太少,甚至可以說(shuō)是忽視的,因此改革的弊端也自然而言地出現(xiàn)。 本文從司法改革角度切入,探索我國(guó)民事司法改革的庭審模式,通過(guò)這篇碩士畢業(yè)論文,筆者希望能夠?qū)λ痉▽?shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的非正式開庭這樣一個(gè)“體制外”的,甚至不為大部分學(xué)者所接受的現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行思考,進(jìn)而能為我國(guó)民事司法改革的思考方向起到拋磚引玉的作用。 本文首先介紹與分析了非正式開庭出現(xiàn)的司法改革這一大的時(shí)代背景。對(duì)司法改革的相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行解釋,并闡述了現(xiàn)階段司法改革的重難點(diǎn)。通過(guò)分析現(xiàn)階段開庭模式而引出非正式開庭的概念及特點(diǎn),論證該現(xiàn)象存在的合理性和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。通過(guò)考察我國(guó)目前訴訟制度以及審判實(shí)踐,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)民事訴訟制度在效率方面存在制度缺陷,由此提出了在正式開庭制度中吸收非正式開庭的設(shè)想,包括在理念層面,立法層面和司法層面的吸收,最終通過(guò)非正式開庭底線的程序保障實(shí)踐,引導(dǎo)人們樹立底線的程序觀念。之所以如此,是因?yàn)橹挥性谒痉▽?shí)踐與社會(huì)生活更好融合的前提下,才可能改變民眾的程序觀念,進(jìn)而更好的建構(gòu)程序。 需強(qiáng)調(diào)的是,本文對(duì)非正式開庭的研究不限于局部的觀察,而是從宏觀的立體的司法改革角度切入,以效率和公平為主線,對(duì)非正式開庭的優(yōu)劣進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)和分析。不敢說(shuō)一定會(huì)對(duì)司法改革提供全新的啟示,只是希望論文能為今后的司法改革提供一些理性的聲音。
[Abstract]:In order to meet the needs of social and economic development, the civil judicial reform in the past ten years has been working towards a faster and more thorough solution to social contradictions, and its achievements are obvious to all. However, it is undeniable that the problems exposed in the reform also need to be reconsidered. Because of the emphasis of the previous reform on the western clientelism and procedural doctrine, the attention to the social reality of our country is too little, or even ignored. Therefore the malpractice of reform also appears naturally. From the angle of judicial reform, this paper explores the trial mode of civil judicial reform in our country. Through this master's thesis, the author hopes to be able to make such an "outside of the system" as the informal court session which appears in judicial practice. Not even for most scholars to think about the phenomenon, and then for the direction of civil judicial reform in China play a role. This paper first introduces and analyzes the background of the judicial reform. This paper explains the related concepts of judicial reform, and expounds the important and difficult points of judicial reform at the present stage. The concept and characteristics of informal court session are introduced by analyzing the current mode of court session, and the rationality and realistic basis of the phenomenon are demonstrated. By reviewing the current litigation system and trial practice in our country, we find that there are institutional defects in the efficiency of the civil litigation system in our country, and thus put forward the idea of absorbing the informal session in the formal court session system, including at the conceptual level. The absorption of the legislative and judicial levels leads people to establish the concept of the bottom-line procedure through the practice of procedural protection of the informal session bottom line. The reason is that only when judicial practice and social life are better integrated, it is possible to change the public's concept of procedure and then construct a better procedure. It should be emphasized that the study of informal court session in this paper is not limited to local observation, but from the macro perspective of three-dimensional judicial reform, efficiency and fairness as the main line to evaluate and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the informal session. I dare not say that it will provide a new enlightenment to the judicial reform, just hope that the thesis can provide some rational voice for the judicial reform in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 張鳳;;論書面審理在民事訴訟簡(jiǎn)易程序中的構(gòu)建[J];前沿;2007年07期

2 朱勇;當(dāng)前西方司法改革的法理學(xué)透視[J];宿州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

3 王亞新;實(shí)踐中的民事審判——四個(gè)中級(jí)法院民事一審程序的運(yùn)作[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年05期

4 徐美君;;刑事訴訟普通程序簡(jiǎn)化審實(shí)證研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年02期

5 潘牧天;;普通程序?qū)徬拗贫鹊娜毕菖c民事訴權(quán)的濫用[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2009年02期

6 任智峰,樊小燕;審前準(zhǔn)備程序的建立與完善[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2401769