【摘要】：在積極應(yīng)對(duì)國(guó)際金融危機(jī),切實(shí)擔(dān)負(fù)“保增長(zhǎng)、保民生、保穩(wěn)定”的重大司法使命的過(guò)程中,能動(dòng)司法的意義得到了前所未有的凸顯。通過(guò)司法實(shí)務(wù)界和法學(xué)理論界的不斷探討與總結(jié),目前,我國(guó)能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵、運(yùn)行、方法和邊界等重要問(wèn)題逐步明確,一些基本共識(shí)在人民法院內(nèi)部業(yè)已初步形成,這為探討能動(dòng)司法的深層次問(wèn)題奠定了基礎(chǔ)。但是,對(duì)能動(dòng)司法為什么會(huì)在金融危機(jī)下的中國(guó)提出并為我國(guó)司法實(shí)務(wù)界普遍接受的問(wèn)題卻沒(méi)有作出合理的解釋。本文試圖在理清能動(dòng)司法基本內(nèi)涵和相關(guān)概念的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)能動(dòng)司法在當(dāng)代中國(guó)產(chǎn)生并發(fā)揮作用的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行分析,以彌補(bǔ)能動(dòng)司法理論上的欠缺,更好地指導(dǎo)能動(dòng)司法在法院司法活動(dòng)中的運(yùn)用。本文的基本思路是：首先,根據(jù)現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵作一個(gè)階段性總結(jié),并對(duì)相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行辨析；其次,從法律史、法哲學(xué)和現(xiàn)實(shí)需求等角度對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的必要性進(jìn)行分析；再次,從理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)兩方面對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的可行性進(jìn)行論述；最后,強(qiáng)調(diào)能動(dòng)司法的邊界回歸,防止盲目能動(dòng)、過(guò)度能動(dòng),破壞司法權(quán)威,倡導(dǎo)一種溫和的能動(dòng)司法。
[Abstract]:In the process of actively responding to the international financial crisis and shouldering the important judicial mission of "ensuring growth, protecting people's livelihood and maintaining stability", the significance of active justice has been highlighted. Through the continuous discussion and summary of judicial practice and legal theory, at present, the connotation, operation, method and boundary of active judicature in our country are gradually clarified, and some basic consensus has been preliminarily formed within the people's court. This has laid the foundation for exploring the deep level question of active judicature. However, there is no reasonable explanation for why the active judicature was put forward in China under the financial crisis and generally accepted by the judicial practice of our country. This paper attempts to analyze the necessity and feasibility of active justice in contemporary China on the basis of clarifying the basic connotation and related concepts of active justice, in order to make up for the lack of active judicial theory. Better guide the use of active justice in court judicial activities. The basic ideas of this paper are as follows: first, according to the existing literature to make a stage summary of the connotation of active justice, and to discriminate and analyze the relevant concepts; Secondly, it analyzes the necessity of active justice from the angles of legal history, philosophy of law and practical needs, and discusses the feasibility of active justice from two aspects: theoretical basis and practical basis. Finally, it emphasizes the boundary return of active justice, prevents blind initiative, excessive initiative, undermines judicial authority, and advocates a kind of moderate active justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 陳朝陽(yáng);法律方法之基礎(chǔ):司法能動(dòng)性[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

2 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會(huì)責(zé)任 從司法社會(huì)化到司法能動(dòng)主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

3 龐凌;法院如何尋求司法能動(dòng)主義與克制主義的平衡[J];法律適用;2004年01期

4 唐力;;能動(dòng)司法:法院訴訟指揮權(quán)之法理分析[J];法律適用;2006年05期

5 陳金釗;目的解釋方法及其意義[J];法律科學(xué)-西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 林國(guó)華;;法律漏洞與自由裁量[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

7 陳朝陽(yáng);;司法哲學(xué)基石范疇:司法能動(dòng)性之法哲理追問(wèn)[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

8 白建軍;論法律實(shí)證分析[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2000年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2314856