【摘要】：民憤早已存在于刑事審判活動(dòng)中是不置可否的事實(shí),從古代中國(guó)到當(dāng)下社會(huì),民憤參與刑事審判的案件不勝枚舉。民憤的大小體現(xiàn)著犯罪對(duì)人們既存的價(jià)值觀念的破壞程度,是人們心理上原有的價(jià)值平衡因受犯罪的沖擊而失衡的嚴(yán)重程度外化；同時(shí),民憤的大小反應(yīng)了人們對(duì)犯罪的否定性評(píng)價(jià)的嚴(yán)厲程度,內(nèi)含著人們要求懲罰犯罪以求恢復(fù)價(jià)值的愿望的強(qiáng)度。因此應(yīng)提倡民憤在刑事審判活動(dòng)中發(fā)揮應(yīng)有作用。另一種聲音否定將民憤作為量刑的依據(jù),認(rèn)為把民憤的有無(wú)和大小作為量刑的重要依據(jù)沒(méi)有理論上和法理上的依據(jù),更有悖于刑罰目的。此種觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,從現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)條件看民憤作為影響量刑的因素存在諸多不合理之處,也不利于審判機(jī)關(guān)依法獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán),與我國(guó)法律規(guī)定的審判機(jī)關(guān)依法獨(dú)立刑事審判權(quán)的原則相違背。 本文將從民憤產(chǎn)生原因,得以存在的基礎(chǔ)方面著手,分析民憤在刑事審判活動(dòng)中所起的作用。著重分析刑事審判活動(dòng)中值得探討的民憤問(wèn)題以及如何處理刑事審判活動(dòng)中的民憤因素,以期找到二者的結(jié)合點(diǎn),而助于刑事審判。
[Abstract]:From ancient China to the present society, there are numerous cases of people's indignation participating in criminal trial. The size of public indignation reflects the degree of destruction of the existing values of people by crime, and is the externalization of the serious degree of imbalance caused by the impact of crime on the original value balance of people in psychology; At the same time, the size of public anger reflects the severity of people's negative evaluation of crime, and contains the intensity of people's desire to punish the crime in order to restore its value. Therefore, public indignation should be advocated to play its due role in the criminal trial. Another kind of voice denies to regard the public anger as the basis of sentencing, and thinks that the existence and size of the public anger as the important basis of sentencing has no theoretical and legal basis, and is more contrary to the purpose of punishment. According to this view, judging from the actual social conditions, there are many unreasonableness in the public indignation as a factor affecting sentencing, and it is also unfavorable for the judicial organs to exercise their judicial power independently according to law. In violation of the principle of independent criminal jurisdiction in accordance with the law. This paper will analyze the role of public anger in criminal trial from the causes of public anger and the basis of its existence. This paper focuses on the analysis of the issue of public indignation in criminal trial activities and how to deal with the factors of public indignation in criminal trial activities in order to find the joint point of the two and to help the criminal trial.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田佳靈;;民意對(duì)司法裁判過(guò)程的影響[J];安徽職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

2 孟慶華;劉涌案件的刑法適用問(wèn)題與思考[J];北京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

3 孫發(fā);司法權(quán)威初步解讀——概念、分類(lèi)和特征[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年09期

4 聶昭偉;論我國(guó)刑事訴訟中專(zhuān)家法律意見(jiàn)的規(guī)范化[J];法學(xué);2005年02期

5 梁白美;王效萱;;淺析我國(guó)司法獨(dú)立的完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年12期

6 李修源;關(guān)于輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立的兩個(gè)話(huà)題[J];人民司法;2000年08期

7 劉燕;;案件事實(shí)的人物建構(gòu)——崔英杰案敘事分析[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2009年02期

8 劉昂;;解讀司法領(lǐng)域的民意——由邱興華案引發(fā)的思考[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

9 崔雙平;;論司法權(quán)威流失的成因及消解[J];通化師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年07期

10 趙斯海 ,華大明;對(duì)社會(huì)心理學(xué)的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1990年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張艷麗;關(guān)于鄧玉嬌案審判的思考[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2305800