【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,民事訴訟數(shù)量不斷激增,如何及時(shí)、有效地化解矛盾,實(shí)現(xiàn)公平正義,是當(dāng)前政法工作的重要任務(wù)。民事行政檢察監(jiān)督,作為檢察機(jī)關(guān)法律監(jiān)督工作的重要組成部分,對(duì)推動(dòng)民事司法,實(shí)現(xiàn)公平正義發(fā)揮著重要作用。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的《民事訴訟法》和《行政訴訟法》的總則都規(guī)定檢察機(jī)關(guān)有權(quán)對(duì)民事審判和行政訴訟實(shí)行法律監(jiān)督,從法律上賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)廣泛的法律監(jiān)督權(quán)限。民事行政檢察工作具有一定的特殊性,在工作中貫徹調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則是一種新的工作思路。2009年12月22日曹建明檢察長(zhǎng)在全國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)學(xué)習(xí)貫徹全國(guó)政法工作會(huì)議精神電視電話會(huì)議的講話中提出要進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)民事審判和行政訴訟監(jiān)督,規(guī)范和加強(qiáng)民事行政申訴案件受理、審查工作,建立健全上下級(jí)檢察院協(xié)同辦案機(jī)制,積極探索會(huì)同有關(guān)部門貫徹調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的機(jī)制和方式,做好服判息訴等工作。 本文分四個(gè)部分論述主題。 第一部分是檢察機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則概述,通過(guò)論述調(diào)解的概念及調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的涵義,并進(jìn)一步指出檢察機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的涵義及民事行政檢察工作中引入調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分是民事行政檢察工作適用調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ),通過(guò)論述檢察機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)解部分民行案件有利于糾紛的解決與社會(huì)穩(wěn)定；檢察機(jī)關(guān)由專門機(jī)構(gòu)負(fù)責(zé)民行抗訴,民行法律專業(yè)知識(shí)深厚,適合擔(dān)當(dāng)調(diào)解；檢察機(jī)關(guān)的公正形象有利于當(dāng)事人接受與認(rèn)可來(lái)表明檢察機(jī)關(guān)適用調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的可行性并適合進(jìn)一步推廣適用。 第三部分是我國(guó)民事行政檢察工作適用調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則現(xiàn)狀和存在的問(wèn)題,通過(guò)分析我國(guó)民事行政檢察工作適用調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則現(xiàn)狀和存在的問(wèn)題為將來(lái)民行檢察工作適用調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則積累更多的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 第四部分是民事行政檢察工作中調(diào)解優(yōu)先運(yùn)行機(jī)制的構(gòu)建�？偨Y(jié)民行檢察工作中調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則的運(yùn)行機(jī)制,進(jìn)一步與法院做好庭前和庭后的調(diào)解工作,并積極的發(fā)揮檢察機(jī)關(guān)自身的作用,做好抗訴申請(qǐng)后的調(diào)解及調(diào)解回訪工作
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the number of civil litigation is increasing rapidly. It is an important task of current political and legal work to resolve contradictions and realize fairness and justice in a timely and effective manner. Civil administrative procuratorial supervision, as an important part of procuratorial organs' legal supervision, plays an important role in promoting civil justice and realizing fairness and justice. In our country, the current Civil procedure Law and the General principles of Administrative procedure Law stipulate that the procuratorial organs have the right to exercise legal supervision over civil trials and administrative proceedings, and legally endow the procuratorial organs with extensive legal supervision powers. Civil administrative procuratorial work has certain particularity. To carry out the principle of priority in mediation is a new way of thinking. On December 22, 2009, Chief Prosecutor Cao Jianming made a speech in the national procuratorial organs to study and implement the National political and legal work Conference Spirit teleconference. Step up supervision of civil trials and administrative proceedings, We will standardize and strengthen the work of accepting civil administrative appeals, examine them, establish and improve the coordination mechanism of procuratorates at the higher and lower levels in handling cases, actively explore mechanisms and methods for carrying out the principle of priority in mediation with relevant departments, and do a good job in service of adjudication and interest litigation. This article is divided into four parts to discuss the theme. The first part is an overview of the mediation priority principle of the procuratorial organ, through the discussion of the concept of mediation and the meaning of the mediation priority principle. Furthermore, it points out the meaning of mediation priority principle in procuratorial organs and the theoretical basis of introducing mediation priority principle into civil administrative procuratorial work. The second part is the practical basis of the civil administrative procuratorial work to apply the principle of mediation priority, through the discussion of procuratorial organs mediation part of civil cases conducive to the settlement of disputes and social stability; The procuratorial organ shall be responsible for the protest by the people, and the law of the people shall have a deep knowledge and is suitable for mediation; The fair image of the procuratorial organ is favorable to the acceptance and approval of the parties to show that the procuratorial organ is feasible to apply the principle of mediation priority and suitable for further popularization and application. The third part is the current situation and existing problems of the application of mediation priority principle in civil administrative procuratorial work in China. Through the analysis of the present situation and existing problems of the application of mediation priority principle in civil administrative procuratorial work in China, more experience has been accumulated for civil procuratorial work to apply mediation priority principle in the future. The fourth part is the construction of the preferential operation mechanism of mediation in civil administrative procuratorial work. Summing up the operating mechanism of mediation priority principle in the procuratorial work of the people's Bank of China, further doing the mediation work before and after the court with the court, and giving full play to the role of the procuratorial organ itself, and doing well the mediation and the mediation return visit work after the protest application.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 史長(zhǎng)青;;調(diào)解與法制:悖而不離的現(xiàn)象分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年02期

2 劉澍;;“調(diào)解優(yōu)先”——一個(gè)待證的司法新命題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2010年07期

3 余小永;;淺論民行檢察適用調(diào)解優(yōu)先原則——以民行檢察和解機(jī)制為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年33期

4 李志平;;檢察環(huán)節(jié)社會(huì)矛盾化解若干問(wèn)題初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年14期

5 孫建昌;促成執(zhí)行和解在民事檢察中的運(yùn)用[J];人民檢察;2000年06期

6 趙芳芳;;適用自愿和解方式處理民行申訴案件探析[J];人民檢察;2008年08期

7 肖揚(yáng);;充分發(fā)揮司法調(diào)解在構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)中的積極作用[J];人民司法;2006年10期

8 徐昀;;“調(diào)解優(yōu)先”的反思——以民事審判結(jié)構(gòu)理論為分析框架[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2010年04期

9 李浩;民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督若干問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1999年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 天津市北辰區(qū)人民檢察院 董廣軍;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2295530