【摘要】：文章首先回顧了基層法律服務所的產(chǎn)生及其發(fā)展歷程,簡介國家在不同時期對其的性質功能定位,主要表現(xiàn)為定位的反復和不連續(xù)；概括了基層法律服務所的基本特征,主要表現(xiàn)為性質和功能的復合性。接著文章提出了影響基層法律服務所發(fā)展的三個障礙。一是國家在基層法律服務所政策方面的問題,主要包括：基層法律服務所沒有明確的法律定位；基層法律服務所執(zhí)業(yè)訴訟代理依據(jù)不清、不合法；對基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員的執(zhí)業(yè)資格標準要求過低；基層法律服務所掛靠鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)司法所現(xiàn)象普遍存在。二是在基層法律服務所執(zhí)業(yè)市場方面存在的問題,主要包括：基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員與律師的執(zhí)業(yè)沖突；基層法律服務所業(yè)務領域難以拓展；對基層法律服務所的監(jiān)管薄弱。三是在基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員隊伍方面存在的問題,主要包括：基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員業(yè)務水平不能勝任執(zhí)業(yè)需要；一些基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員缺乏職業(yè)誠信；基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員執(zhí)業(yè)困難、缺少保障。針對基層法律服務所發(fā)展的障礙,文章深入剖析了這些障礙的成因,主要包括：國家對基層法律服務所政策規(guī)定的不完善是導致其立法、體制等方面缺陷的根本原因,對基層法律服務所管理主體的問題、管理權限的薄弱、管理手段的缺乏是監(jiān)管不力的根本原因,對基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員教育培訓不足是其水平低下的根本原因。基層法律服務所的長期存在和發(fā)展有著深厚的社會條件、群眾基礎和體制需求,基層法律服務所具有廣闊的發(fā)展前景。文章給出了基層法律服務所發(fā)展的對策。一是加快規(guī)范基層法律服務所發(fā)展的立法,使基層法律服務所工作有法可依,主要包括：明確定位、“兩所分離”；界定基層法律服務所業(yè)務領域；確定基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員的資格及準入條件。二是加大對基層法律服務所的監(jiān)管,主要包括：規(guī)范司法行政機關的管理和監(jiān)督；加強行業(yè)管理和監(jiān)督；健全基層法律服務所內部管理；加強社會監(jiān)督。三是加強基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員隊伍建設,主要包括：加強思想政治教育；加強職業(yè)道德和執(zhí)業(yè)紀律教育；加強業(yè)務知識培訓；建立違規(guī)違紀行為的懲處機制；做好基層法律服務所從業(yè)人員的保障工作。四是積極拓展基層法律服務所工作領域,主要包括：緊緊圍繞當?shù)攸h委政府中心工作開展法律服務；主動為農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展服務；創(chuàng)新法律服務形式。最后,通過比較外國的基層法律服務制度,結合我國國情,對基層法律服務所的長遠發(fā)展進行了展望：轉型到法律援助、人民調解和律師中去,進行隊伍分流。
[Abstract]:The article first reviews the emergence and development course of the grass-roots legal service institute, introduces the nature and function orientation of the basic legal service institute in different periods, mainly shows the repetition and discontinuity of the orientation, summarizes the basic characteristics of the legal service institute at the grass-roots level. Mainly for the nature and function of the compound. Then the article puts forward three obstacles that affect the development of legal service at the grass-roots level. First, the problems of the national policy in the grass-roots legal service, including: the grass-roots legal service does not have a clear legal position, the legal service at the grass-roots legal service practice litigation agent basis is unclear, illegal; The standard of qualification for the practitioners of grass-roots legal service institutions is too low, and the phenomenon of supporting township judicial offices in grass-roots legal services is common. Second, there are some problems in the practice market of the grass-roots legal service, including: the conflict between the practitioners and the lawyers; the difficulty in expanding the business field of the grass-roots legal service; and the weak supervision of the grass-roots legal service. Third, there are some problems in the field of grass-roots legal service staff, including: the professional level of grass-roots legal service providers can not meet the needs of the practice, some grass-roots legal service providers lack professional integrity; It is difficult for the practitioners of grassroots legal services to practise, and lack of protection. In view of the obstacles in the development of grass-roots legal service, the article deeply analyzes the causes of these obstacles, including: the imperfection of the national policy on the grass-roots legal service is the fundamental reason leading to the defects in legislation and system, etc. The weakness of the management authority and the lack of management means are the fundamental reasons for the weak supervision of the subject of legal service at the grass-roots level, and the lack of education and training for the practitioners of the legal service at the grass-roots level is the fundamental reason for its low level. The long-term existence and development of grass-roots legal services have profound social conditions, mass basis and system needs, and the grass-roots legal services have broad development prospects. This paper gives the countermeasures for the development of the legal service at the grassroots level. The first is to speed up the legislation of standardizing the development of legal services at the grass-roots level, so that the work of the legal services at the grass-roots level can be governed by law, which mainly includes: defining clearly the orientation of the two branches, "separating the two branches", defining the business areas of the legal service offices at the grass-roots level; To determine the qualifications and entry conditions of legal service providers at the grassroots level. The second is to strengthen the supervision of grass-roots legal service institutions, including: standardizing the management and supervision of judicial administrative organs; strengthening industry management and supervision; perfecting the internal management of grass-roots legal services; and strengthening social supervision. The third is to strengthen the construction of the staff of the grass-roots legal service, mainly including: strengthening the ideological and political education; strengthening the professional ethics and discipline education; strengthening the training of professional knowledge; establishing the punishment mechanism for violations of discipline; We will do a good job in ensuring the employees of grassroots legal services. Fourth, we should actively expand the field of legal services at the grass-roots level, mainly including: developing legal services closely around the central work of local party committees and governments; taking the initiative to serve rural economic and social development; and innovating the forms of legal services. Finally, by comparing the foreign legal service system at the grass-roots level, combined with the national conditions of our country, the author looks forward to the long-term development of the grass-roots legal service: the transition to legal aid, people's mediation and lawyers, and the division of the ranks.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 夏志澤;基層法律服務訴訟代理的困境與出路[J];長江大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

，

本文編號：2285409