本文選題：審判公開(kāi) + 信息化　； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：審判公開(kāi)作為現(xiàn)代審判制度的基本理念，是對(duì)審判權(quán)運(yùn)行進(jìn)行民主監(jiān)督的一種制度安排，其核心是把審判活動(dòng)置于陽(yáng)光之下，讓司法裁判經(jīng)得起推敲、經(jīng)得起檢驗(yàn)、經(jīng)得起評(píng)判，以公開(kāi)促公正，以公正促公信，達(dá)到良性循環(huán)。在信息化浪潮的沖刷之下，，傳統(tǒng)的審判公開(kāi)制度正呈現(xiàn)出新的形態(tài)，煥發(fā)著勃勃生機(jī)。通過(guò)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)現(xiàn)審判公開(kāi)，是實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正、提升司法公信力的客觀要求，也是信息化時(shí)代背景下社會(huì)公眾了解、參與、監(jiān)督司法的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要。在當(dāng)前這樣一個(gè)信息化時(shí)代研究審判公開(kāi)意義非凡。 本文將從以下四個(gè)方面對(duì)信息化條件下的審判公開(kāi)進(jìn)行研究： 第一部分為審判公開(kāi)的基本內(nèi)涵探析，擬解決審判公開(kāi)的兩個(gè)理論問(wèn)題，即厘清審判公開(kāi)的概念和探究審判公開(kāi)的實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)涵，為下文分析問(wèn)題、提出對(duì)策奠定堅(jiān)實(shí)的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二部著重考察了旁聽(tīng)、庭審的直播與錄播、裁判文書(shū)的公開(kāi)這三種傳統(tǒng)審判公開(kāi)方式，并從整體上梳理了傳統(tǒng)審判公開(kāi)存在的局限性。 第三部分具體分析了信息化條件對(duì)審判公開(kāi)產(chǎn)生的影響以及當(dāng)前審判公開(kāi)制度發(fā)展所面臨的挑戰(zhàn)與問(wèn)題。 第四部分針對(duì)當(dāng)前信息化條件下審判公開(kāi)制度發(fā)展所面臨的問(wèn)題，提出創(chuàng)設(shè)審判公開(kāi)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)新載體、搭建審判流程公開(kāi)平臺(tái)、排除裁判文書(shū)上網(wǎng)的恣意空間以及建立審判公開(kāi)的救濟(jì)程序這四點(diǎn)完善建議。
[Abstract]:As the basic concept of the modern trial system, trial openness is a kind of system arrangement for democratic supervision of the operation of judicial power. Its core is to put the trial activities under the sun, so that the judicial judgment can withstand scrutiny and test. Stand judgment, open to promote justice, justice to promote public trust, to achieve a virtuous circle. Under the tide of information technology, the traditional open trial system is showing a new form and full of vitality. Public trial through information network is the objective requirement to realize judicial justice and enhance judicial credibility. It is also the realistic need for the public to understand participate and supervise the administration of justice under the background of information age. It is of great significance to study trial openness in such an information age. This article will carry on the research from the following four aspects to the trial open under the information condition: the first part is the basic connotation analysis of the trial publicity, intends to solve two theory questions of the trial open. That is to clarify the concept of open trial and explore the essential connotation of open trial, and lay a solid theoretical foundation for the following analysis and countermeasures. The second part focuses on the three traditional ways of open trial, such as overhearing, direct broadcast and recording of court hearings, and the opening of judgment documents, and combs the limitations of the opening of traditional trials as a whole. The third part analyzes the influence of informatization conditions on trial openness and the challenges and problems faced by the development of open trial system. In the fourth part, aiming at the problems faced by the development of open trial system under the current information condition, the author proposes to create a new network carrier of open trial, and to set up the open platform of trial process. The four perfect suggestions are to exclude the wanton space of the judgment documents and to establish the public trial relief procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王福華;民事審判公開(kāi)制度的雙重含義[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1999年02期

2 韓紅俊;民事公開(kāi)審判[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年07期

3 張莉;;中國(guó)司法公開(kāi)制度的發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)司法;2011年09期

4 張志銘;司法判決的結(jié)構(gòu)和風(fēng)格——對(duì)域外實(shí)踐的比較研究[J];法學(xué);1998年10期

5 胡夏冰;;裁判文書(shū)上網(wǎng)難點(diǎn)及對(duì)策[J];法制資訊;2009年07期

6 高一飛;賀紅強(qiáng);;庭審旁聽(tīng)權(quán)及其實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2013年01期

7 張晉紅;審判公開(kāi)思想與修訂《民事訴訟法》的幾個(gè)基本關(guān)系定位[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年04期

8 賀衛(wèi)方;對(duì)電視直播庭審過(guò)程的異議[J];中國(guó)律師;1998年09期

9 崔英楠,劉風(fēng)景;公開(kāi)審判制度的理論與實(shí)踐[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

10 趙琦;;刑事審判公開(kāi)實(shí)施效果實(shí)證研究——基于傳統(tǒng)與信息化兩個(gè)途徑的考察[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2012年04期

本文編號(hào)：2099837