發(fā)布時間：2018-05-25 21:42

  本文選題：陪審制度 + 人民陪審制度�。� 參考：《中國政法大學》2006年碩士論文

【摘要】：陪審制度是西方國家一項頗具特色的法律制度,它“起源于古代奴隸制國家的雅典和羅馬,被扼于封建專制社會,稱頌于資產(chǎn)階級革命時期,盛行于英美等資本主義國家,仿效于世界各國,亦實行于前蘇聯(lián)、東歐一些國家,并移植于我國�！迸銓徶贫人蔑@的維護人民主權(quán)、促進司法公正、保障正當程序等價值,使得西方各國的資產(chǎn)階級在取得革命勝利并建立國家政權(quán)后,不約而同地在其憲法或基本的法律文件中明文規(guī)定了陪審制度。但是到現(xiàn)在,陪審制度在各國的命運又不盡相同,有的國家不斷發(fā)展和完善該制度并成為其他各國相繼效仿的對象;有的國家的陪審制度適用則呈縮小的趨勢。 陪審制度有兩種類型:一種主要適用于英美法系國家,如英國、美國等,另一種主要適用于大陸法系國家,如法國、德國等,二者有一定的差別。我國現(xiàn)行的人民陪審員制度,是在借鑒原蘇聯(lián)司法經(jīng)驗的基礎(chǔ)上并結(jié)合我國具體司法實踐逐步形成的,其發(fā)展經(jīng)歷了幾起幾落。 由于我國陪審制度在司法實踐中的運行效果不盡如人意,所以在我國學術(shù)界對該制度存在著“存廢之爭”。但筆者認為之所以會出現(xiàn)這種現(xiàn)象,是由我國的陪審在立法及制度方面的不完善造成的,并不能因此而簡單地否定人民陪審制度。 筆者文章正文分為四個部分,其寫作思路與內(nèi)容大致如下:文章第一部分主要介紹了陪審制度的含義及歷史發(fā)展。其中對陪審制度的兩大類型做了較為詳細的介紹,并對它們作了比較研究。第二部分主要闡述了陪審制度的功能。認為陪審制度在體現(xiàn)司法民主、促進司法公正、加強法獨立、保持司法廉潔和對公民進行法制教育方面都有不可低估的作用。第三部分對我國陪審制度的歷史演變進行了介紹,并對現(xiàn)狀進行了分析。通過分析,筆者認為我國目前陪審制度的運行不盡如人意,主要是因為我國在立法上的不夠完善和具體制度的粗糙造成的,所以當前的任務是應當如何完善它,而不是廢除它。第四部分對如何改革和完善我國的陪審制度提出了具體的設(shè)想。主要包括立法層面和制度層面的完善。
[Abstract]:The jury system is a characteristic legal system in western countries. It "originated from Athens and Rome in ancient slavery countries, was choked in feudal autocratic society, praised the period of bourgeois revolution and prevailed in capitalist countries such as the United States and the United States." It was imitated in the world, also practiced in the former Soviet Union, some countries in Eastern Europe, and transplanted to our country. " The value of safeguarding people's sovereignty, promoting judicial justice and ensuring due process, which is manifested in the jury system, made the bourgeoisie of the western countries win the revolutionary victory and establish the state power. The jury system is expressly stipulated in its constitution or basic legal documents. But up to now, the fate of jury system in different countries is different. Some countries develop and perfect the system and become the object of other countries' emulation one after another, while the application of jury system in some countries is decreasing. There are two types of jury system: one mainly applies to Anglo-American law countries, such as the United Kingdom, the United States, the other mainly applies to civil law countries, such as France, Germany and so on, there is a certain difference between the two. The current people's jury system in our country is formed gradually on the basis of drawing lessons from the judicial experience of the former Soviet Union and combining with the concrete judicial practice of our country, and its development has experienced several ups and downs. Because the effect of the jury system in judicial practice is not satisfactory, there is a debate on the system in the academic circles of our country. However, the author thinks that this phenomenon is caused by the imperfect legislation and system of the jury in our country, and it can not simply negate the people's jury system. The main body of the article is divided into four parts, and its writing ideas and contents are as follows: the first part mainly introduces the meaning and historical development of jury system. Among them, the two types of jury system are introduced in detail, and they are comparatively studied. The second part mainly expounds the function of jury system. The jury system can not be underestimated in embodying judicial democracy, promoting judicial justice, strengthening the independence of law, maintaining judicial integrity and educating citizens on the legal system. The third part introduces the historical evolution of the jury system in China and analyzes the present situation. Through the analysis, the author thinks that the operation of the jury system in our country is not satisfactory at present, mainly because the legislation in our country is not perfect and the concrete system is rough, so the current task is how to perfect it, not to abolish it. The fourth part of how to reform and improve the jury system in China put forward specific ideas. Mainly includes the legislative level and the system level consummation.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2006
【分類號】：D926.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 黃林妍;;教育對預防和矯治青少年違法犯罪的關(guān)鍵作用——結(jié)合青少年特征及其違法犯罪原因[J];神州;2012年15期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張慶;論人民陪審制度的完善[D];重慶大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1934751