本文選題：法律推理 + 司法審判��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以法律推理為切入點，首先對法律推理理論的基礎問題進行了概述，在此基礎上，著重對目前我國司法審判活動中運用法律推理的現(xiàn)狀進行了詳細地分析研究，探尋所存在的問題，從而引出應如何完善我國司法審判中的法律推理，以建立相對完善的司法審判法律推理機制，，充分保證判決的合理性、公正性與明確性，從而實現(xiàn)司法正義。 本文正文共分四部分。第一章是法律推理基本問題概述，主要從法律推理理論的歷史演進、概念剖析、特點歸納和類型劃分等方面進行了簡單的梳理。第二章主要是圍繞法律推理在司法審判中的功能和價值進行探索。第三章主要是針對我國司法審判活動中的法律推理所存在的問題及其產(chǎn)生原因進行研究，指出了法律推理在審判中存在哪些亟待克服的不足。第四章是從實踐與理論的角度探尋在我國司法審判制度下如何完善法律推理的途徑。 法律推理理論還有諸多研究方向，本文僅選取其中具有代表性和實踐意義的司法審判中的法律推理加以分析。文章創(chuàng)新之處在于，從法律推理的基本理論下筆，對法律推理理論進行了系統(tǒng)的整理，并著重結合法律推理的歷史、概念、屬性、類型等有關問題展開研究，充分認識了法律推理在我國司法審判實踐中所存在的問題及其產(chǎn)生原因，并以此為基礎，提出了如何在我國當前的司法體制下，完善司法審判制度中的法律推理的方法；對以法律推理推動司法審判制度改革的結論，本文沿著“概念分析—必要性和價值—對策建議”的思路進行研究和分析，有助于將問題引向深入，形成標本兼治的問題解決方案。
[Abstract]:In this paper, legal reasoning is taken as the starting point. Firstly, the basic problems of the theory of legal reasoning are summarized, and on this basis, the current situation of the application of legal reasoning in judicial activities in our country is analyzed and studied in detail. In order to find out the existing problems, how to perfect the legal reasoning in the judicial trial of our country, to establish the relatively perfect legal reasoning mechanism of judicial trial, to fully guarantee the rationality, fairness and clarity of the judgment. In order to achieve judicial justice. This text is divided into four parts. The first chapter is an overview of the basic problems of legal reasoning, mainly from the historical evolution of the theory of legal reasoning, conceptual analysis, characteristic induction and classification. The second chapter mainly focuses on the function and value of legal reasoning in judicial trial. The third chapter mainly focuses on the problems and causes of the legal reasoning in the judicial activities of our country, and points out the shortcomings of the legal reasoning in the trial. The fourth chapter explores how to perfect the legal reasoning under the judicial system of our country from the angle of practice and theory. There are still many research directions in the theory of legal reasoning. The innovation of this paper lies in the systematic arrangement of the legal reasoning theory from the basic theory of legal reasoning, and the research on the history, concept, attribute and type of legal reasoning. This paper fully understands the problems and causes of legal reasoning in the judicial trial practice of our country, and puts forward the method of how to perfect the legal reasoning in the judicial system under the current judicial system of our country. On the conclusion of promoting the reform of judicial system by legal reasoning, this paper studies and analyzes the idea of "Conceptual Analysis-necessity and value-Countermeasures and suggestions", which is helpful to lead the problem to a deeper level. Form a solution to the problem with both symptoms and symptoms.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D90-051;D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張繼成;價值判斷是法律推理的靈魂[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2001年01期

2 張傳新;;論法律推理的有效性[J];法律方法;2003年00期

3 羅書平;裁判文書與訴訟證據(jù)[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2002年05期

4 侯猛;中國的后現(xiàn)代法學研究及其前景[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2001年02期

5 沈宗靈;法律推理與法律適用[J];法學;1988年05期

6 解興權;法律及其推理的確定性論析[J];甘肅政法學院學報;1998年04期

7 蘇力;認真對待人治[J];華東政法學院學報;1998年01期

8 金承光;從法律邏輯學的視角審視規(guī)范邏輯[J];昆明師范高等�？茖W校學報;2005年03期

9 蘇力;判決書的背后[J];法學研究;2001年03期

10 張保生;;法律推理中的法律理由和正當理由[J];法學研究;2006年06期

本文編號：1908485