本文選題：民意　切入點：司法判決　出處：《上海師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著中國法治建設(shè)的不斷進行，民眾的法律意識也在不斷增強，對司法案件的關(guān)注也越來越多。諸多與司法裁判有關(guān)的問題日益浮出水面，不僅僅是法學理論界和法律實務(wù)界，社會各屆人士都予以充分關(guān)注。在司法實踐中，越來越多的案件吸引了各界人士的眼球，例如許霆案、云南李昌奎案等等，這些案件涉及到的案件事實、裁判過程以及判決結(jié)果無一不在觸動人們的神經(jīng)。通過對近幾年爭議性案件的分析，筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)，我國的司法實踐和某些來自民眾中的因素發(fā)生了千絲萬縷的關(guān)系，也對司法實踐產(chǎn)生了一定的影響，社會上一般將這一因素稱之為民意。民意之所以與司法實踐產(chǎn)生了如此復雜的關(guān)聯(lián)，筆者認為大致有以下兩大原因：其一，公民法律意識的提高，促使民眾本能地關(guān)注司法案件；其二，近年來國家越發(fā)強調(diào)關(guān)注民生，要求人民法院最大限度地滿足人民的司法需求，這是國家有意識地將民意與司法實踐二者結(jié)合起來。 由于厘清民意的內(nèi)涵是一件非常困難的事情，而且民意是流變的，還存在真民意與偽民意之分，，所以在司法實踐中面臨的難題便是如何處理民意與司法判決的關(guān)系，這是司法無法回避的難題。一方面國家要求法院要更加注重保障民生，牢牢把握社情民意，真正認識民意，把人民群眾的愿望和期待作為人民法院確立工作思路的依據(jù)；另一方面，司法審判應(yīng)依法審判，法院應(yīng)依法行使職權(quán)，獨立審判，不受外界因素的影響。當二者產(chǎn)生沖突的時候，如何解決其中的矛盾，做到既依法裁判，又保障裁判結(jié)果的可接受性，這是當前我國司法實踐急需解決的問題。 在本文中，筆者通過對司法實踐中的爭議性案件的分析，引出本文的主題“民意和司法的關(guān)系”，并通過梳理概念，分析民意對司法的積極與消極影響，從而提出二者應(yīng)建立一種協(xié)調(diào)關(guān)系。司法應(yīng)吸納民意，但是應(yīng)該通過合法渠道，避免民意對司法裁判的不正當干預。
[Abstract]:With the development of the rule of law in China, people's legal consciousness is increasing, and more and more attention has been paid to judicial cases.Many problems related to the administration of justice come to the surface day by day, not only in the field of legal theory and practice, but also in all sections of the society.In judicial practice, more and more cases have attracted the attention of people from all walks of life, such as Xu Ting case, Yunnan Li Changkui case and so on.Based on the analysis of controversial cases in recent years, the author finds that the judicial practice in our country is closely related to some factors from the public, and it also has a certain influence on the judicial practice.Society generally refers to this factor as public opinion.The reason why public opinion and judicial practice have such a complex connection, I think there are two main reasons: first, the increase of citizens' legal awareness, urge the public instinctively to pay attention to judicial cases; second,In recent years, the country pays more and more attention to the people's livelihood and requires the people's court to satisfy the people's judicial needs to the maximum extent. This is a conscious combination of public opinion and judicial practice.Since it is very difficult to clarify the meaning of public opinion, and because public opinion is changing and there is still a distinction between real and false public opinion, the problem in judicial practice is how to deal with the relationship between public opinion and judicial decisions.This is a difficult problem that the judiciary cannot avoid.On the one hand, the state requires the court to pay more attention to safeguarding the people's livelihood, firmly grasp the social situation and public opinion, truly understand the public opinion, and regard the wishes and expectations of the people as the basis for the people's court to establish its working mentality; on the other hand, the judicial trial should be tried according to law.The court should exercise its functions and powers according to law and try independently without the influence of external factors.When the two conflicts arise, how to solve the contradiction and ensure the acceptability of the adjudication result according to the law is an urgent problem in the judicial practice of our country.In this paper, through the analysis of controversial cases in judicial practice, the author leads to the theme of this article, "the relationship between public opinion and justice", and through combing the concept, analyzes the positive and negative influence of public opinion on the administration of justice.Therefore, it is suggested that a kind of coordination relationship should be established between the two.The judicature should absorb public opinion, but should avoid the improper interference of public opinion to the administration of justice through legal channels.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭成良,陳海光;論法官職業(yè)思維方式的養(yǎng)成[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2002年12期

2 周永坤;論法官查找法律的權(quán)力[J];法學;2004年04期

3 周永坤;;我們需要什么樣的司法民主[J];法學;2009年02期

4 金悅;;精英、民意與陪審制度[J];法制與社會;2007年03期

5 王淵;;媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨立的法理分析[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2006年01期

6 高敏;;程序正義在中國的缺失和實現(xiàn)——佘祥林案和劉涌案的啟示[J];杭州電子科技大學學報(社會科學版);2006年02期

7 何兵;司法職業(yè)化與民主化[J];法學研究;2005年04期

8 唐煜楓;;論民意與死刑實踐——一個互動關(guān)系的視角[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年02期

9 肖揚;;中國司法:挑戰(zhàn)與改革[J];人民司法;2005年01期

10 鄭成良,張英霞,李會;中美兩國司法理念的比較[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2003年02期

本文編號：1725379