發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-25 16:35

  本文選題：推翻先例　切入點(diǎn)：追溯性造法　出處：《東方法學(xué)》2017年03期

【摘要】：普通法的法官推翻先例或缺乏法律參考時(shí)會(huì)進(jìn)行追溯性造法,這在普通法傳統(tǒng)中是一種常見(jiàn)現(xiàn)象,并且也在學(xué)理上得到了支持。更為重要的是,追溯性造法雖然兼具立法和司法的雙重屬性,但這種造法行為卻不會(huì)構(gòu)成權(quán)力專斷,因?yàn)橄壤贫戎械闹T多因素對(duì)其構(gòu)成了制約。如果法治的宗旨是防止權(quán)力專斷,那么追溯性造法顯然不會(huì)與法治相悖,因?yàn)樗鼰o(wú)法任性或?qū)嗟剡\(yùn)用權(quán)力。隨著"案例指導(dǎo)制度"在中國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的廣泛應(yīng)用,普通法中推翻先例引發(fā)的追溯性造法問(wèn)題也會(huì)在中國(guó)以新的面目出現(xiàn),那么對(duì)普通法中相關(guān)問(wèn)題的討論,也許能為我們提供些許啟發(fā),從而有助于推進(jìn)我國(guó)的法治建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:A common law judge who overturns precedents or lacks legal reference makes law retroactively, which is a common phenomenon in the common law tradition and is also supported in theory. More importantly, Although retroactive law has the dual attribute of legislation and judicature, it does not constitute power arbitrariness because many factors in precedent system restrict it. If the purpose of the rule of law is to prevent power arbitrariness, Then it is clear that the retroactive law will not contradict the rule of law, because it cannot exercise power willfully or arbitrarily. With the widespread application of the "case guidance system" in judicial practice in China, The problem of retroactive law-making caused by overturning precedents in common law will also appear in China. Therefore, the discussion of relevant issues in common law may provide us with some inspiration and help to promote the construction of the rule of law in our country.
【作者單位】： 西北政法大學(xué)行政法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D916.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1664005