本文選題：司法過程　切入點：價值衡量　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文以司法過程中的價值衡量作為研究對象,一是要說明價值衡量在司法中的存在,二則是要解決司法中價值衡量的客觀化問題。論文的前三章主要是圍繞第一個問題展開的論述,而在對價值衡量在司法中的具體表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行分析之后,引出第二個問題,并通過后三章的論述對此問題予以解決。前言和結(jié)論部分則是對本文的問題意識與核心關(guān)注進(jìn)行的概括與總結(jié)。 前言部分重點交代問題意識、理論淵源與研究現(xiàn)狀、本文的研究范圍與思路。本文的問題意識在于,價值衡量作為突破傳統(tǒng)法律方法適用瓶頸的一種新的法律方法,其在司法中是如何存在的,并且如何才能保證其客觀化；對于理論淵源及研究現(xiàn)狀,作者主要是就國內(nèi)外與司法的價值衡量有關(guān)的知識和材料進(jìn)行了介紹；本文的研究范圍與思路則側(cè)重對兩個問題進(jìn)行說明,即研究范圍的限定及論文各個章節(jié)的基本內(nèi)容與聯(lián)系。 第一章,司法中價值衡量的界定。首先闡明什么是價值與價值衡量,之后指出在法學(xué)中存在兩種形式的價值衡量,一種是立法中的價值衡量,另一種是司法中的價值衡量。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者探討了價值衡量在司法中的表現(xiàn)形態(tài)。 第二章,價值衡量在司法中存在的場域。作者主要圍繞疑難案件的解決與價值衡量、法律原則的適用與價值衡量以及傳統(tǒng)法律方法的適用與價值衡量等三個問題展開論述,用以說明價值衡量在司法中的存在。 第三章,價值衡量在司法中的具體表現(xiàn)。以在法律體系中存在的三大實體法的分類為基礎(chǔ),作者分別對民法適用中的價值衡量、刑法適用中的價值衡量以及行政審判中的價值衡量進(jìn)行了分析,并結(jié)合案例進(jìn)行說明。在此基礎(chǔ)上,作者提出了在司法中進(jìn)行價值衡量所面臨的難題,即價值衡量的客觀化問題。 第四章,價值衡量客觀化的路徑之一——遵循價值位階的價值衡量。在這一章中,針對司法中價值衡量的客觀化難題,作者首先承認(rèn)存在著一個法的價值體系,并且在這個價值體系中存在著價值的分層,即價值位階。而遵循價值位階的價值衡量實際上主要是一個對價值位階進(jìn)行發(fā)現(xiàn)的過程。 第五章,價值衡量客觀化的路徑之二——比例性衡量。本章通過對比例原則的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行分析,指出比例原則與價值衡量存在著雙重關(guān)系,特別是比例原則對價值衡量能夠形成一種控制,從而保障著價值衡量的客觀化�；诖�,可以在價值衡量中引入比例原則,進(jìn)行比例性的衡量。 第六章,價值衡量客觀化的程序保障。本章首先論述了正當(dāng)法律程序?qū)r值衡量客觀化的正向保障作用,這主要是通過審判程序的結(jié)構(gòu)原則和運(yùn)行原則來實現(xiàn)的；其次論述了法律論證程序?qū)r值衡量客觀化的逆向保障作用,而在法律論證的各種方法中又以程序性法律論證方法對價值衡量客觀化的保障最為有力。
[Abstract]:This article regards the value measurement in the judicial process as the research object, the first is to explain the existence of the value measurement in the judicature. The first three chapters mainly focus on the discussion of the first problem, and after analyzing the concrete performance of the value measurement in the judicature, it leads to the second question. The preface and conclusion are the summary and summary of the problem consciousness and core concern. The preface focuses on explaining the consciousness of the problem, the origin of the theory and the present situation of the research, and the scope and thinking of the research. The problem consciousness of this paper lies in that the value measurement is a new legal method which breaks through the bottleneck of the application of the traditional legal method. How to exist in the judicial system and how to ensure its objectivity, the author mainly introduces the knowledge and materials related to the value measurement of the judicature at home and abroad. The research scope and thought of this paper focus on two issues, namely, the limitation of the research scope and the basic content and relation of each chapter of the paper. The first chapter is the definition of value measurement in judicature. First, it clarifies what is value and value measurement, and then points out that there are two forms of value measurement in law, one is value measure in legislation, the other is value measurement in legislation. The other is the value measurement in the judicature, and on this basis, the author discusses the form of the value measurement in the judicature. The second chapter, the field of value measurement in the judicature. The author mainly discusses three problems: the solution and value measurement of difficult cases, the application and value measurement of legal principles, and the application and value measurement of traditional legal methods. Used to illustrate the existence of a value measure in the administration of justice. Based on the classification of the three substantive laws in the legal system, the author measures the value in the application of civil law. The value measurement in the application of criminal law and the value measurement in the administrative trial are analyzed, and the case is explained. On this basis, the author puts forward the difficult problems of the value measurement in the administration of justice. Namely, the objective problem of value measurement. Chapter 4th, one of the paths to objectification of value measurement-follows the value measurement of value rank. In this chapter, in view of the difficult problem of objectification of value measurement in justice, the author first acknowledges the existence of a value system of law. And there is a hierarchy of value in this value system, that is, the value rank, and the value measurement following the value rank is mainly a process of discovering the value rank. Chapter 5th, the path of objectification of value measurement, is proportional measurement. This chapter analyzes the connotation of the principle of proportion and points out that there is a double relationship between the principle of proportion and the measure of value. In particular, the principle of proportion can form a kind of control over the measurement of value, which ensures the objectification of the measure of value, based on which the principle of proportion can be introduced into the measurement of value to carry on the measure of proportionality. Chapter 6th, procedural guarantee of objectification of value measurement. This chapter firstly discusses the positive safeguard function of due legal procedure to the objectification of value measurement, which is mainly realized by the principle of structure and operation of trial procedure; Secondly, it discusses the reverse safeguard function of the legal argumentation procedure to the objectification of the value measurement, and the procedural legal argumentation method is the most effective in the various methods of the legal argumentation to guarantee the objectification of the value measurement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D916.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李秀群;;司法中的價值衡量[J];法律方法;2005年00期

2 張利春;;日本民法中的利益衡量論[J];法律方法;2008年00期

3 黎宏;行為無價值論與結(jié)果無價值論:現(xiàn)狀和展望[J];法學(xué)評論;2005年06期

4 李可;;價值衡量的十大進(jìn)路——對法理學(xué)方法論之謎的破解[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年03期

5 孫國華;關(guān)于“法”與“法律”的區(qū)別的對話[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期

6 魏勝強(qiáng);;司法能動與價值衡量[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年01期

7 葉必豐;行政合理性原則的比較與實證研究[J];江海學(xué)刊;2002年06期

8 郭道暉;論法與法律的區(qū)別——對法的本質(zhì)的再認(rèn)識[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年06期

9 李步云;;論人權(quán)的三種存在形態(tài)[J];法學(xué)研究;1991年04期

10 魏治勛;;司法過程中的利益衡量批判[J];求是學(xué)刊;2006年03期

，

本文編號：1618247